Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Nov 19;62(21):1977-1985. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.027. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
The study aimed to determine whether isolated heart rate (HR) reduction with ivabradine reduces afterload of patients with systolic heart failure.
The effective arterial elastance (Ea) represents resistive and pulsatile afterload of the heart derived from the pressure volume relation. HR modulates Ea, and, therefore, afterload burden.
Among the patients with systolic heart failure (ejection fraction ≤35%) randomized to either placebo or ivabradine in the SHIFT (Systolic Heart Failure Treatment With the If Inhibitor Ivabradine Trial), 275 patients (n = 132, placebo; n = 143, ivabradine 7.5 mg twice a day) were included in the echocardiographic substudy. Ea, total arterial compliance (TAC), and end-systolic elastance (Ees) were calculated at baseline and after 8 months of treatment. Blood pressure was measured by arm cuff; stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction, and end-diastolic volume were assessed by echocardiography.
At baseline Ea, TAC, HR, and Ees did not differ significantly between ivabradine- and placebo-treated patients. After 8 months of treatment, HR was significantly reduced in the ivabradine group (p < 0.0001) and was accompanied by marked reduction in Ea (p < 0.0001) and improved TAC (p = 0.004) compared with placebo. Although contractility remained unchanged, ventricular-arterial coupling was markedly improved (p = 0.002), resulting in a higher SV (p < 0.0001) in the ivabradine-treated patients.
Isolated HR reduction by ivabradine improves TAC, thus reducing Ea. Because Ees is unaltered, improved ventricular-arterial coupling is responsible for increased SV. Therefore, unloading of the heart may contribute to the beneficial effect of isolated HR reduction in patients with systolic heart failure.
本研究旨在确定伊伐布雷定是否能降低收缩性心力衰竭患者的孤立心率(HR)降低后的心脏负荷。
有效动脉弹性(Ea)代表了心脏的阻力和脉动后负荷,来源于压力-容积关系。HR 调节 Ea,从而调节后负荷负担。
在接受收缩性心力衰竭(射血分数≤35%)的患者中,SHIFT 试验(伊伐布雷定治疗收缩性心力衰竭试验)随机分为安慰剂或伊伐布雷定组,共有 275 名患者(n = 132,安慰剂;n = 143,伊伐布雷定 7.5 mg,每日两次)纳入了超声心动图亚组研究。在基线和治疗 8 个月后,计算 Ea、总动脉顺应性(TAC)和收缩末期弹性(Ees)。血压通过臂式血压计测量;通过超声心动图评估心搏量(SV)、射血分数和舒张末期容积。
在基线时,Ea、TAC、HR 和 Ees 在伊伐布雷定和安慰剂治疗的患者之间没有显著差异。治疗 8 个月后,伊伐布雷定组 HR 显著降低(p<0.0001),并伴有 Ea 明显降低(p<0.0001)和 TAC 改善(p=0.004),与安慰剂相比。尽管收缩性保持不变,但心室-动脉偶联明显改善(p=0.002),导致伊伐布雷定治疗的患者 SV 增加(p<0.0001)。
伊伐布雷定引起的孤立 HR 降低可改善 TAC,从而降低 Ea。由于 Ees 不变,改善的心室-动脉偶联是 SV 增加的原因。因此,孤立 HR 降低对收缩性心力衰竭患者的有益作用可能与心脏卸载有关。