Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Laboratory of Circulating Tumor Biomarkers, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Int J Cancer. 2014 Mar 1;134(5):1207-13. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28436. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have been recently investigated in several cancer types, but their respective clinical significance remains to be determined. In our prospective study, we compared the detection rate and the prognostic value of these two circulating biomarkers in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. GNAQ/GNA11 mutations were characterized in archived tumor tissue. Using a highly sensitive and mutation-specific bidirectional pyrophosphorolysis-activated polymerization (bi-PAP) technique, GNAQ c.626A>T, GNAQ c.626A>C and GNA11 c.626A>T copy numbers were quantified in plasma from 12 mL of blood. CTCs were detected at the same time in 7.5 mL of blood by the CellSearch technique. Patient characteristics and outcome were prospectively collected. CTCs (≥1) were detected in 12 of the 40 included patients (30%, range 1-20). Among the 26 patients with known detectable mutations, ctDNA was detected and quantified in 22 (84%, range 4-11,421 copies/mL). CTC count and ctDNA levels were associated with the presence of miliary hepatic metastasis (p = 0.004 and 0.03, respectively), with metastasis volume (p = 0.005 and 0.004) and with each other (p < 0.0001). CTC count and ctDNA levels were both strongly associated with progression-free survival (p = 0.003 and 0.001) and overall survival (p = 0.0009 and <0.0001). In multivariate analyses, ctDNA appeared to be a better prognostic marker than CTC. In conclusion, ctDNA and CTC are correlated and both have poor prognostic significance. CTC detection can be performed in every patient but, in patients with detectable mutations, ctDNA was more frequently detected than CTC and has possibly more prognostic value.
循环肿瘤细胞 (CTCs) 和循环肿瘤 DNA (ctDNA) 最近在多种癌症类型中得到了研究,但它们各自的临床意义仍有待确定。在我们的前瞻性研究中,我们比较了这两种循环生物标志物在转移性葡萄膜黑色素瘤患者中的检测率和预后价值。对存档的肿瘤组织进行 GNAQ/GNA11 突变特征分析。使用高度敏感和突变特异性双向焦磷酸酶激活聚合 (bi-PAP) 技术,定量分析了 12 毫升血液中 GNAQ c.626A>T、GNAQ c.626A>C 和 GNA11 c.626A>T 的拷贝数。同时,通过 CellSearch 技术在 7.5 毫升血液中检测 CTCs。前瞻性收集患者特征和结果。在 40 名纳入的患者中,有 12 名(30%,范围 1-20)检测到 CTCs(≥1)。在 26 名已知可检测到突变的患者中,22 名(84%,范围 4-11421 拷贝/ml)检测到并定量了 ctDNA。CTC 计数和 ctDNA 水平与存在弥漫性肝转移(p = 0.004 和 0.03)、转移体积(p = 0.005 和 0.004)和彼此相关(p < 0.0001)。CTC 计数和 ctDNA 水平与无进展生存期(p = 0.003 和 0.001)和总生存期(p = 0.0009 和 <0.0001)均有强烈相关性。在多变量分析中,ctDNA 似乎是一种比 CTC 更好的预后标志物。总之,ctDNA 和 CTC 相关,均具有不良的预后意义。CTCs 检测可在每位患者中进行,但在可检测到突变的患者中,ctDNA 的检测频率高于 CTC,且可能具有更好的预后价值。