Ochalski Pawel, Chivukula Srinivas, Shin Samuel, Prevedello Daniel, Engh Johnathan
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2014 May;75(3):195-205; discussion 206. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1348348. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhages (ICHs) cause significant morbidity and mortality. Traditional open surgical management strategies offer limited benefit except for the most superficial hemorrhages in select patients. Recent reports suggest that endoscopic approaches may improve outcomes, particularly for deep subcortical hemorrhages. However, the management of these patients remains controversial. We reviewed our experience using endoscopic port surgery to identify characteristics that may predict acceptable outcomes.
We completed a retrospective chart and imaging review of patients who underwent endoscopic port surgery for evacuation of spontaneous ICH at a single center. Data were gathered regarding patient demographics, hemorrhage locations, operative findings, and clinical outcomes.
From 2007 to 2011, 18 patients underwent evacuation of spontaneous intracerebral hematomas using an endoscopic port. The mean age in years was 62 years (range, 43-84 years). Six of 18 patients (33%) died before discharge, and 2 others (11%) died after at least 1 month of survival. Of 12 initial survivors, all were discharged to a rehabilitation or nursing facility. Complete hematoma evacuation was achieved in 7 of 18 patients, with the remaining 11 having a partial evacuation. The patients who died (n = 6) before discharge were statistically more likely to have a left-sided hemorrhage, partial evacuation, or older age than the survivors; death at least 1 month after evacuation was additionally associated with greater preoperative hematoma volumes.
Our series demonstrates that endoscopic port surgery for acute intracerebral hematoma evacuation has the ability to achieve significant decompression of large and deep-seated hematomas. Patient age, extent of evacuation, laterality, and preoperative hematoma volume appear to influence patient outcome. Most overall outcomes remain poor. Future studies are necessary to determine if surgical evacuation is in fact superior to best medical treatment and if so, to validate, refute, or further identify characteristics that define surgical candidates.
自发性脑出血(ICH)会导致严重的发病率和死亡率。传统的开放手术治疗策略益处有限,仅适用于特定患者中最表浅的出血情况。最近的报告表明,内镜手术方法可能改善治疗效果,尤其是对于深部皮质下出血。然而,这些患者的治疗仍存在争议。我们回顾了我们使用内镜端口手术的经验,以确定可能预测可接受治疗效果的特征。
我们对在单一中心接受内镜端口手术以清除自发性脑出血的患者进行了回顾性病历和影像学检查。收集了有关患者人口统计学、出血部位、手术发现和临床结果的数据。
2007年至2011年,18例患者接受了内镜端口清除自发性脑内血肿手术。平均年龄为62岁(范围43 - 84岁)。18例患者中有6例(33%)在出院前死亡,另外2例(11%)在存活至少1个月后死亡。12例初始幸存者均被转至康复或护理机构。18例患者中有7例实现了血肿完全清除,其余11例为部分清除。出院前死亡的患者(n = 6)在统计学上比幸存者更有可能出现左侧出血、部分清除或年龄较大;在清除血肿至少1个月后死亡还与术前血肿体积较大有关。
我们的系列研究表明,内镜端口手术用于急性脑内血肿清除能够实现对大的深部血肿的显著减压。患者年龄、清除程度、出血侧别和术前血肿体积似乎会影响患者的治疗效果。总体而言,大多数治疗效果仍然较差。未来有必要进行研究,以确定手术清除是否实际上优于最佳药物治疗,如果是这样,验证、反驳或进一步确定定义手术候选者的特征。