Suppr超能文献

当前心脏病学教学方法的有效性:SKILLS(医学生低级临床技能知识整合)研究

Effectiveness of current teaching methods in Cardiology: the SKILLS (medical Students Knowledge Integration of Lower Level clinical Skills) study.

作者信息

Lavranos G, Koliaki C, Briasoulis A, Nikolaou A, Stefanadis C

机构信息

1 Department of Cardiology, Medical School, Athens University, Greece.

出版信息

Hippokratia. 2013 Jan;17(1):34-7.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study is to assess reported changes in medical students' capacity to attain five basic cardiological clinical skills, following a one-month intensive cardiology course provisioned in the core curriculum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An anonymous questionnaire comprising self reported performance in the five skills, namely 1) arterial blood pressure measurement, 2) cardiac auscultation, 3) electrocardiogram (ECG) carry out, 4) ECG interpretation and 5) defibrillation, was distributed to 177 fifth year students of the Athens Medical School upon initiating the cardiology course (pre-training group) and to 59 students matched for sex, age, year of study and training centre, following completion of the course (post training group). Comparison of pre- and post- training performance was evaluated using the χ(2) test.

RESULTS

No change was noted with regards to blood pressure measurement, cardiac auscultation or defibrillation. By contrast, a statistically significant improvement was reported for ECG execution (54.3 versus 81.4%; p<0.001) and interpretation (from 33.1 to 89.8%; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Improvement in the execution and interpretation of ECGs seems to be among the strengths of the cardiology training program. Further studies including larger samples from multiple medical schools and objective assessment of skill execution might facilitate accurate training evaluation and define opportunities for improvement.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是评估在核心课程中提供为期一个月的强化心脏病学课程后,医学生在五项基本心脏病学临床技能方面所报告的变化。

材料与方法

在心脏病学课程开始时,向雅典医学院的177名五年级学生(预培训组)发放了一份匿名问卷,问卷包括对五项技能(即1)动脉血压测量、2)心脏听诊、3)心电图(ECG)操作、4)心电图解读和5)除颤)的自我报告表现;课程结束后,向59名在性别、年龄、学习年份和培训中心方面匹配的学生(培训后组)发放了相同问卷。使用χ(2)检验评估培训前后表现的差异。

结果

在血压测量、心脏听诊或除颤方面未发现变化。相比之下,心电图操作(54.3%对81.4%;p<0.001)和解读(从33.1%到89.8%;p<0.001)方面有统计学显著改善。

结论

心电图操作和解读能力的提高似乎是心脏病学培训项目的优势之一。包括来自多所医学院的更大样本以及对技能操作进行客观评估的进一步研究,可能有助于准确评估培训效果并确定改进机会。

相似文献

3
Teaching crucial skills: An electrocardiogram teaching module for medical students.教授关键技能:一个面向医学生的心电图教学模块
J Electrocardiol. 2016 Jul-Aug;49(4):490-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.03.021. Epub 2016 Mar 29.

本文引用的文献

9
What is happening to bedside clinical teaching?床边临床教学正在发生什么?
Med Educ. 2002 Dec;36(12):1185-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01372.x.
10
Self and peer assessment in tutorials: application of a relative-ranking model.
Acad Med. 2002 Nov;77(11):1134-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200211000-00016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验