• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜泌尿外科手术的工效学现状:来自中国 241 位泌尿外科医师的调查结果。

Ergonomic status of laparoscopic urologic surgery: survey results from 241 urologic surgeons in china.

机构信息

Department of Reproductive Center, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Jul 31;8(7):e70423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070423. Print 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0070423
PMID:23936202
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3729835/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prolonged and frequent use of laparoscopic equipment raises ergonomic risks that may cause physical distress for surgeons. We aimed to assess the prevalence of urologic surgeons' physical distress associated with ergonomic problems in the operating room (OR) and their awareness of the ergonomic guidelines in China.

METHODS

A sample of 300 laparoscopic urologists in China was assessed using a questionnaire on demographic information, ergonomic issues in the OR, musculoskeletal symptoms, and awareness of the ergonomic guidelines for the OR.

RESULTS

There were 241 survey respondents (86.7%) with valid questionnaires. Among the respondents, only 43.6% placed the operating table at pubic height during the actual operation. The majority of the respondents (63.5%) used only one monitor during the procedure. Only 29.9% placed the monitor below the eye level. More than half of the respondents (50.6%) preferred to use manual control instead of the foot pedal. Most of the respondents (95.0%) never used the body support. The respondents experienced discomfort in the following regions, in ascending order: leg (21.6%), hand (30.3%), wrist (32.8%), shoulder (33.6%), back (53.1%), and neck (58.1%). The respondents with over 250 total operations experienced less discomfort than those with less than 250 total operations. Most of the respondents (84.6%) were unaware of the ergonomic guidelines. However, almost all of the respondents (98.3%) regarded the ergonomic guidelines to be important in the OR.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the laparoscopic urologists were not aware of the ergonomic guidelines for the OR; hence, they have been suffering from varying degrees of physical discomfort caused by ergonomic issues. There is an urgent need for education regarding ergonomic guidelines in the OR for laparoscopic urologists in China.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜设备的长时间和频繁使用会带来人体工程学风险,可能会给外科医生带来身体不适。我们旨在评估与手术室(OR)中的人体工程学问题相关的泌尿科医生身体不适的发生率,以及他们对中国人体工程学准则的认识。

方法

我们对中国 300 名腹腔镜泌尿科医生进行了抽样调查,使用问卷评估人口统计学信息、OR 中的人体工程学问题、肌肉骨骼症状以及对 OR 人体工程学准则的认识。

结果

在 241 名有有效问卷的调查对象中,只有 43.6%的人在实际操作中将手术台置于耻骨高度。大多数调查对象(63.5%)在手术过程中仅使用一个监视器。只有 29.9%的人将监视器置于眼睛以下的位置。超过一半的调查对象(50.6%)更喜欢使用手动控制而不是脚踏板。大多数调查对象(95.0%)从未使用过身体支撑。调查对象感到不适的部位依次为:腿部(21.6%)、手部(30.3%)、手腕(32.8%)、肩部(33.6%)、背部(53.1%)和颈部(58.1%)。总手术量超过 250 例的调查对象比总手术量少于 250 例的调查对象感到的不适程度较轻。大多数调查对象(84.6%)不知道人体工程学准则。然而,几乎所有的调查对象(98.3%)都认为人体工程学准则在 OR 中很重要。

结论

大多数腹腔镜泌尿科医生不知道 OR 人体工程学准则;因此,他们一直受到不同程度的由人体工程学问题引起的身体不适。中国腹腔镜泌尿科医生迫切需要接受有关 OR 人体工程学准则的教育。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50bd/3729835/1c985b3a6f1b/pone.0070423.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50bd/3729835/5d2da7ea12c8/pone.0070423.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50bd/3729835/1c985b3a6f1b/pone.0070423.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50bd/3729835/5d2da7ea12c8/pone.0070423.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50bd/3729835/1c985b3a6f1b/pone.0070423.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Ergonomic status of laparoscopic urologic surgery: survey results from 241 urologic surgeons in china.腹腔镜泌尿外科手术的工效学现状:来自中国 241 位泌尿外科医师的调查结果。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 31;8(7):e70423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070423. Print 2013.
2
Application of ergonomic guidelines during minimally invasive surgery: a questionnaire survey of 284 surgeons.微创手术中人体工程学指南的应用:对284名外科医生的问卷调查
Surg Endosc. 2006 Aug;20(8):1268-74. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0647-y. Epub 2006 Jul 20.
3
Ergonomics in thoracoscopic surgery: results of a survey among thoracic surgeons.胸腔镜手术中的人体工程学:胸外科医生的调查结果
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Aug;15(2):197-200. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs173. Epub 2012 May 14.
4
Awareness and practice of ergonomics by gynecological laparoscopists in Turkey.土耳其妇科腹腔镜医师对人体工效学的认知与实践。
Ginekol Pol. 2020;91(4):175-180. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2020.0036. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
5
Ergonomics in endourology and laparoscopy: an overview of musculoskeletal problems in urology.泌尿内镜和腹腔镜手术中的工效学:泌尿科肌肉骨骼问题概述。
J Endourol. 2014 May;28(5):605-11. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0654. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
6
Ergonomics considerations of radical prostatectomy: physician perspective of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted techniques.根治性前列腺切除术的人体工程学考量:医生对开放、腹腔镜及机器人辅助技术的观点
J Endourol. 2009 Apr;23(4):627-33. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0556.
7
The operation room as a hostile environment for surgeons: physical complaints during and after laparoscopy.手术室对外科医生来说是一个恶劣的环境:腹腔镜检查期间及之后的身体不适。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010 Apr;19(2):105-9. doi: 10.3109/13645701003643972.
8
The ergonomics of women in surgery.手术中的女性人体工效学。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Apr;28(4):1051-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3281-0.
9
Sources of pain in laparoendoscopic gynecological surgeons: An analysis of ergonomic factors and proposal of an aid to improve comfort.腹腔镜妇科外科医生的疼痛来源:人体工程学因素分析及提高舒适度辅助工具的建议
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):e0184400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184400. eCollection 2017.
10
Ergonomics principles associated with laparoscopic surgeon injury/illness.与腹腔镜外科医生损伤/疾病相关的人体工程学原则。
Hum Factors. 2012 Dec;54(6):1087-92. doi: 10.1177/0018720812451046.

引用本文的文献

1
Continental Assessment of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Prevalence Among Surgeons: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.外科医生中与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病患病率的大陆评估:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Jun 9;10(2):221. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10020221.
2
Perceived comfort and tool usability during robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic surgery: a survey study.机器人辅助手术与传统腹腔镜手术过程中的感知舒适度和工具易用性:一项调查研究。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jan 13;18(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01785-7.
3
Effect of Assisted Surgery on Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorder Prevalence by Body Area among Surgeons: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Ergonomics principles associated with laparoscopic surgeon injury/illness.与腹腔镜外科医生损伤/疾病相关的人体工程学原则。
Hum Factors. 2012 Dec;54(6):1087-92. doi: 10.1177/0018720812451046.
2
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A series of one hundred cases performed by the same surgeon.腹腔镜部分肾切除术:同一外科医生实施的100例系列手术。
Urol Ann. 2012 Sep;4(3):162-5. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.102664.
3
Physical strain and urgent need for ergonomic training among gynecologic oncologists who perform minimally invasive surgery.
辅助手术对不同身体部位的外科医生职业性肌肉骨骼疾病发病率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;20(14):6419. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20146419.
4
Surgeon perception of factors affecting the efficiency of conventional and robotic laparoscopy: A Pan India study.外科医生对影响传统腹腔镜手术和机器人辅助腹腔镜手术效率因素的认知:一项全印度研究。
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 24;8(12):e12561. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12561. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
The burden of performing minimal access surgery: ergonomics survey results from 462 surgeons across Germany, the UK and the USA.微创外科手术的负担:来自德国、英国和美国的 462 名外科医生的人体工程学调查结果。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Dec;16(6):1347-1354. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01358-6. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
6
Surgical ergonomics for urologists: a practical guide.泌尿外科手术工效学:实用指南。
Nat Rev Urol. 2021 Mar;18(3):160-169. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-00414-4. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
7
Surgeon symptoms, strain, and selections: Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical ergonomics.外科医生的症状、劳损及选择:外科手术人体工程学的系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2018 Jan 9;27:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.12.013. eCollection 2018 Mar.
8
Evaluation of 3D heads-up vitrectomy: outcomes of psychometric skills testing and surgeon satisfaction.3D 头高脚低位玻璃体切除术评估:心理测量技能测试和外科医生满意度的结果。
Eye (Lond). 2018 Jun;32(6):1093-1098. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0027-1. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
9
Prevalence of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Surgeons and Interventionalists: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.外科医生和介入医生中与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Feb 21;153(2):e174947. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4947.
10
Ergonomics in the operating room.手术室中的人体工程学
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2457-2466. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5247-5. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
妇科肿瘤学家在进行微创手术时的身体劳损和对人体工程学培训的迫切需求。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Sep;126(3):437-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.05.016. Epub 2012 May 18.
4
Ergonomics in thoracoscopic surgery: results of a survey among thoracic surgeons.胸腔镜手术中的人体工程学:胸外科医生的调查结果
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Aug;15(2):197-200. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs173. Epub 2012 May 14.
5
Ergonomic factors on task performance in laparoscopic surgery training.腹腔镜手术训练中任务绩效的工效学因素。
Appl Ergon. 2012 May;43(3):548-53. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.08.010. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
6
The operation room as a hostile environment for surgeons: physical complaints during and after laparoscopy.手术室对外科医生来说是一个恶劣的环境:腹腔镜检查期间及之后的身体不适。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010 Apr;19(2):105-9. doi: 10.3109/13645701003643972.
7
Ergonomics considerations of radical prostatectomy: physician perspective of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted techniques.根治性前列腺切除术的人体工程学考量:医生对开放、腹腔镜及机器人辅助技术的观点
J Endourol. 2009 Apr;23(4):627-33. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0556.
8
Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines.微创手术套房中腹腔镜手术的最佳人体工程学:综述与指南
Surg Endosc. 2009 Jun;23(6):1279-85. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0148-x. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
9
Ergonomic assessment of optimum operating table height for hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery.手辅助腹腔镜手术最佳手术台高度的人体工程学评估
Surg Endosc. 2009 Apr;23(4):783-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0068-9. Epub 2008 Jul 16.
10
Surgeons' perceptions and injuries during and after urologic laparoscopic surgery.泌尿外科腹腔镜手术期间及术后外科医生的认知与损伤
Urology. 2008 Mar;71(3):404-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.077.