Suppr超能文献

HIV-1 亚型在 CASCADE 合作研究中对 cART 的病毒学和免疫学反应。

Virologic and immunologic response to cART by HIV-1 subtype in the CASCADE collaboration.

机构信息

Athens University Medical School, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Jul 30;8(7):e71174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071174. Print 2013.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare rates of virologic response and CD4 changes after combination antiretroviral (cART) initiation in individuals infected with B and specific non-B HIV subtypes.

METHODS

Using CASCADE data we analyzed HIV-RNA and CD4 counts for persons infected ≥1996, ≥15 years of age. We used survival and longitudinal modeling to estimate probabilities of virologic response (confirmed HIV-RNA <500 c/ml), and failure (HIV-RNA>500 c/ml at 6 months or ≥1000 c/ml following response) and CD4 increase after cART initiation.

RESULTS

2003 (1706 B, 142 CRF02_AG, 55 A, 53 C, 47 CRF01_AE) seroconverters were included in analysis. There was no evidence of subtype effect overall for response or failure (p = 0.075 and 0.317, respectively) although there was a suggestion that those infected with subtypes CRF01_AE and A responded sooner than those with subtype B infection [HR (95% CI):1.37 (1.01-1.86) and 1.29 (0.96-1.72), respectively]. Rates of CD4 increase were similar in all subtypes except subtype A, which tended to have lower initial, but faster long-term, increases.

CONCLUSIONS

Virologic and immunologic response to cART was similar across all studied subtypes but statistical power was limited by the rarity of some non-B subtypes. Current antiretroviral agents seem to have similar efficacy in subtype B and most widely encountered non-B infections in high-income countries.

摘要

背景

我们旨在比较感染 B 型和特定非 B 型 HIV 亚型的个体在开始联合抗逆转录病毒(cART)治疗后病毒学应答和 CD4 变化的发生率。

方法

使用 CASCADE 数据,我们分析了感染 ≥1996 年且年龄≥15 岁的个体的 HIV-RNA 和 CD4 计数。我们使用生存和纵向建模来估计病毒学应答(确认 HIV-RNA<500 c/ml)和失败(6 个月时 HIV-RNA>500 c/ml 或应答后≥1000 c/ml)以及 cART 起始后 CD4 增加的概率。

结果

共纳入了 2003 名(1706 名 B 型、142 名 CRF02_AG、55 名 A 型、53 名 C 型、47 名 CRF01_AE)血清转换者进行分析。虽然有迹象表明感染 CRF01_AE 和 A 亚型的个体比感染 B 亚型的个体应答更快[危险比(95%CI):1.37(1.01-1.86)和 1.29(0.96-1.72)],但总体上没有发现亚型对应答或失败有影响(p=0.075 和 0.317)。所有亚型的 CD4 增加率相似,除了 A 亚型,该亚型初始值较低,但长期增加较快。

结论

cART 的病毒学和免疫学应答在所有研究的亚型中相似,但由于某些非 B 亚型的罕见性,统计学效力有限。目前的抗逆转录病毒药物在高收入国家的 B 型和最常见的非 B 型感染中似乎具有相似的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1c1/3728088/62c3037a3c5a/pone.0071174.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验