• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情境上下文和任务指令对偶然学习注意的空间以自我为中心的编码的影响。

Egocentric coding of space for incidentally learned attention: effects of scene context and task instructions.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):233-50. doi: 10.1037/a0033870. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1037/a0033870
PMID:23937234
Abstract

Visuospatial attention prioritizes regions of space for perceptual processing. Knowing how attended locations are represented is critical for understanding the architecture of attention. We examined the spatial reference frame of incidentally learned attention and asked how it is influenced by explicit, top-down knowledge. Participants performed a visual search task in which a target was more likely to appear in one, "rich," quadrant of the screen than in the others. The spatial relationship between the display and the viewer's perspective changed partway through the experiment. Because incidentally learned attention is persistent, the spatial bias that developed during training was present following the change in viewer perspective. Despite the presence of multiple environmental landmarks including a background scene, participants prioritized rich regions relative to their perspective, rather than relative to the environment. Remarkably, the egocentric attentional bias was unaffected by explicit knowledge of where the target was likely to appear. Although participants used this knowledge to prioritize the region of space they were told was likely to contain a target, a strong egocentric bias to a region that was unlikely to contain a target persisted. These data indicate that incidental attention differs fundamentally from attention driven by explicit knowledge. We propose that attention takes 2 forms. One is declarative, based on maps that explicitly prioritize some regions of space over others. The other is procedural, influenced by implicit knowledge that modulates how attention is moved through space.

摘要

视空间注意优先处理空间中的区域,以便进行感知处理。了解注意到的位置是如何被表示的,对于理解注意的结构至关重要。我们研究了偶然习得的注意的空间参照系,并询问了它如何受到明确的自上而下的知识的影响。参与者执行了一项视觉搜索任务,其中目标更有可能出现在屏幕的一个“丰富”象限中,而不是其他象限中。在实验过程中,显示器和观察者视角之间的空间关系发生了变化。由于偶然习得的注意是持久的,因此在训练过程中形成的空间偏向在观察者视角发生变化后仍然存在。尽管存在多个环境地标,包括背景场景,但参与者相对于自己的视角,而不是相对于环境,优先考虑丰富的区域。值得注意的是,自我中心的注意力偏向不受目标可能出现的位置的明确知识的影响。尽管参与者利用这种知识来优先考虑他们被告知可能包含目标的空间区域,但对不太可能包含目标的区域的强烈自我中心偏向仍然存在。这些数据表明,偶然注意力与明确知识驱动的注意力有根本的不同。我们提出注意有两种形式。一种是陈述性的,基于明确优先考虑某些空间区域的地图。另一种是程序性的,受调节注意力在空间中移动方式的隐性知识的影响。

相似文献

1
Egocentric coding of space for incidentally learned attention: effects of scene context and task instructions.情境上下文和任务指令对偶然学习注意的空间以自我为中心的编码的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):233-50. doi: 10.1037/a0033870. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
2
Spatial reference frame of incidentally learned attention.偶然学习到的注意力的空间参照框架。
Cognition. 2013 Mar;126(3):378-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.011. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
3
Visual search and location probability learning from variable perspectives.从可变视角进行视觉搜索和位置概率学习。
J Vis. 2013 May 28;13(6):13. doi: 10.1167/13.6.13.
4
Directing attention based on incidental learning in children with autism spectrum disorder.基于偶然学习引导自闭症谱系障碍儿童的注意力。
Neuropsychology. 2013 Mar;27(2):161-9. doi: 10.1037/a0031648.
5
Judgements of relative direction: the effect of task instructions on spatial recall.相对方向的判断:任务指令对空间记忆的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013 Jun;66(6):1090-103. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.729599. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
6
The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.试验的剩余部分:目标确定的选择性注意的试验间抑制
Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:195-213. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17611-2.
7
Attentional prioritizations based on spatial probabilities can be maintained on multiple moving objects.基于空间概率的注意力优先级可以在多个移动物体上得以维持。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 May;72(4):926-38. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.4.926.
8
Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention.情境线索化:视觉情境的内隐学习与记忆引导空间注意力。
Cogn Psychol. 1998 Jun;36(1):28-71. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0681.
9
Egocentric reference in bidirectional readers as measured by the straight-ahead pointing task.通过直视指向任务测量双向阅读者的自我中心参照。
Brain Res. 2009 Jan 9;1247:133-41. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.09.098. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
10
Investigating the role of response in spatial context learning.探究反应在空间情境学习中的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Aug;64(8):1563-79. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.564291. Epub 2011 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial transfer of object-based statistical learning.基于对象的统计学习的空间转移。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Apr;86(3):768-775. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02852-3. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
2
Contribution of peripheral vision to attentional learning.周边视觉对注意力学习的作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jan;86(1):95-108. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02808-z. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
3
Independence of implicitly guided attention from goal-driven oculomotor control.内隐引导注意的独立性不受目标驱动的眼球运动控制的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jul;84(5):1460-1476. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02491-6. Epub 2022 May 10.
4
Is probabilistic cuing of visual search an inflexible attentional habit? A meta-analytic review.视觉搜索的概率 cue 是否是一种不灵活的注意习惯?一项元分析综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Apr;29(2):521-529. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02025-5. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
5
Habitual versus goal-driven attention.习惯性注意与目标驱动注意。
Cortex. 2018 May;102:107-120. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
6
Aging affects the balance between goal-guided and habitual spatial attention.衰老会影响目标导向和习惯空间注意之间的平衡。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1135-1141. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1214-3.
7
Spatial working memory interferes with explicit, but not probabilistic cuing of spatial attention.空间工作记忆会干扰空间注意的显性提示,但不会干扰概率性提示。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 May;41(3):787-806. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000040. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
8
Changing viewer perspectives reveals constraints to implicit visual statistical learning.改变观察者的视角揭示了内隐视觉统计学习的局限性。
J Vis. 2014 Oct 7;14(12):3. doi: 10.1167/14.12.3.
9
Task specificity of attention training: the case of probability cuing.注意力训练的任务特异性:概率提示的案例
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Jan;77(1):50-66. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0747-7.
10
Spatial reference frame of attention in a large outdoor environment.大型户外环境中注意力的空间参照系。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Aug;40(4):1346-57. doi: 10.1037/a0036779. Epub 2014 May 19.