Department of Psychology.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):233-50. doi: 10.1037/a0033870. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
Visuospatial attention prioritizes regions of space for perceptual processing. Knowing how attended locations are represented is critical for understanding the architecture of attention. We examined the spatial reference frame of incidentally learned attention and asked how it is influenced by explicit, top-down knowledge. Participants performed a visual search task in which a target was more likely to appear in one, "rich," quadrant of the screen than in the others. The spatial relationship between the display and the viewer's perspective changed partway through the experiment. Because incidentally learned attention is persistent, the spatial bias that developed during training was present following the change in viewer perspective. Despite the presence of multiple environmental landmarks including a background scene, participants prioritized rich regions relative to their perspective, rather than relative to the environment. Remarkably, the egocentric attentional bias was unaffected by explicit knowledge of where the target was likely to appear. Although participants used this knowledge to prioritize the region of space they were told was likely to contain a target, a strong egocentric bias to a region that was unlikely to contain a target persisted. These data indicate that incidental attention differs fundamentally from attention driven by explicit knowledge. We propose that attention takes 2 forms. One is declarative, based on maps that explicitly prioritize some regions of space over others. The other is procedural, influenced by implicit knowledge that modulates how attention is moved through space.
视空间注意优先处理空间中的区域,以便进行感知处理。了解注意到的位置是如何被表示的,对于理解注意的结构至关重要。我们研究了偶然习得的注意的空间参照系,并询问了它如何受到明确的自上而下的知识的影响。参与者执行了一项视觉搜索任务,其中目标更有可能出现在屏幕的一个“丰富”象限中,而不是其他象限中。在实验过程中,显示器和观察者视角之间的空间关系发生了变化。由于偶然习得的注意是持久的,因此在训练过程中形成的空间偏向在观察者视角发生变化后仍然存在。尽管存在多个环境地标,包括背景场景,但参与者相对于自己的视角,而不是相对于环境,优先考虑丰富的区域。值得注意的是,自我中心的注意力偏向不受目标可能出现的位置的明确知识的影响。尽管参与者利用这种知识来优先考虑他们被告知可能包含目标的空间区域,但对不太可能包含目标的区域的强烈自我中心偏向仍然存在。这些数据表明,偶然注意力与明确知识驱动的注意力有根本的不同。我们提出注意有两种形式。一种是陈述性的,基于明确优先考虑某些空间区域的地图。另一种是程序性的,受调节注意力在空间中移动方式的隐性知识的影响。