• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创单侧椎弓根螺钉固定及腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病

Minimally invasive unilateral pedicle screw fixation and lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease.

作者信息

Lin Bin, Xu Yang, He Yong, Zhang Bi, Lin Qiuyan, He Mingchang

出版信息

Orthopedics. 2013 Aug;36(8):e1071-6. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130724-26.

DOI:10.3928/01477447-20130724-26
PMID:23937756
Abstract

Minimally invasive unilateral pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases has won the support of many surgeons. However, few data are available regarding clinical research on unilateral pedicle screw fixation associated with minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of lumbar spinal diseases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes in a selected series of patients with lumbar degenerative diseases treated with minimally invasive unilateral vs classic bilateral pedicle screw fixation and lumbar interbody fusion. Patients in the unilateral group (n=43) underwent minimally invasive unilateral pedicle screw fixation with the Quadrant system (Medtronic, Memphis, Tennessee). The bilateral group (n=42) underwent bilateral instrumentation via the classic approach. Visual analog scale pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index scores, fusion rate, operative time, blood loss, and complications were analyzed. Mean operative time was 75 minutes in the unilateral group and 95 minutes in the bilateral group. Mean blood loss was 220 mL in the unilateral group and 450 mL in the bilateral group. Mean postoperative visual analog scale pain score was 3.10±0.16 in the unilateral group and 3.30±1.10 in the bilateral group. Mean postoperative Oswestry Disability Index score was 15.67±2.3 in the unilateral group and 14.93±2.6 in the bilateral group. Successful fusion was achieved in 92.34% of patients in the unilateral group and 93.56% of patients in the bilateral group. Minimally invasive unilateral pedicle screw fixation is an effective and reliable option for the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. It causes less blood loss, requires less operative time, and has a fusion rate comparable with that of conventional bilateral fixation.

摘要

微创单侧椎弓根螺钉固定治疗退行性腰椎疾病已获得许多外科医生的支持。然而,关于单侧椎弓根螺钉固定联合微创技术治疗腰椎疾病的临床研究数据较少。本研究的目的是评估一系列选择的腰椎退行性疾病患者,采用微创单侧与经典双侧椎弓根螺钉固定及腰椎椎间融合术的临床疗效。单侧组(n = 43)患者采用Quadrant系统(美敦力公司,田纳西州孟菲斯)进行微创单侧椎弓根螺钉固定。双侧组(n = 42)通过经典入路进行双侧内固定。分析视觉模拟量表疼痛评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数评分、融合率、手术时间、失血量和并发症。单侧组平均手术时间为75分钟,双侧组为95分钟。单侧组平均失血量为220 mL,双侧组为450 mL。单侧组术后视觉模拟量表平均疼痛评分为3.10±0.16,双侧组为3.30±1.10。单侧组术后Oswestry功能障碍指数平均评分为15.67±2.3,双侧组为14.93±2.6。单侧组92.34%的患者和双侧组93.56%的患者实现了成功融合。微创单侧椎弓根螺钉固定是治疗腰椎退行性疾病的一种有效且可靠的选择。它导致的失血量更少,所需手术时间更短,融合率与传统双侧固定相当。

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive unilateral pedicle screw fixation and lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease.微创单侧椎弓根螺钉固定及腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病
Orthopedics. 2013 Aug;36(8):e1071-6. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130724-26.
2
Radiographic Analysis of One-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) With Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MI-TLIF)联合单侧椎弓根螺钉固定治疗腰椎退行性疾病的影像学分析
Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Feb;29(1):E1-8. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000042.
3
[Clinical study on unilateral pedicle screw fixation and interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases under Quadrant system].Quadrant系统下单侧椎弓根螺钉固定椎间融合治疗腰椎退变性疾病的临床研究
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2012 Jun;25(6):468-73.
4
Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的单侧与双侧椎弓根螺钉内固定术
J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Sep;21(9):1612-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.11.055. Epub 2014 May 9.
5
Minimally invasive lumbar transfacet screw fixation in the lateral decubitus position after extreme lateral interbody fusion: a technique and feasibility study.极外侧椎间融合术后侧卧位微创腰椎经关节突螺钉固定:一项技术与可行性研究
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Apr;26(2):98-106. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318241f6c3.
6
[A feasibility research of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using unilateral incision and hybrid internal fixation for dural-level lumbar degenerative disease].[单侧切口及混合内固定微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗硬脊膜节段性腰椎退变性疾病的可行性研究]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Aug;27(8):955-9.
7
Minimally invasive unilateral versus bilateral technique in performing single-segment pedicle screw fixation and lumbar interbody fusion.单节段椎弓根螺钉固定及腰椎椎间融合术中微创单侧与双侧技术比较
J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Jul 16;10:112. doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0253-1.
8
Unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.单侧与双侧经皮椎弓根螺钉固定微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Aug;35(2):E11. doi: 10.3171/2013.2.FOCUS12398.
9
Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.微创外侧椎间融合术治疗无附加椎弓根螺钉固定的上位相邻节段腰椎退变性狭窄症
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Dec;21(6):861-6. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.SPINE13841. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
10
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Unilateral Fixation for Degenerative Lumbar Disease.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术及单侧固定治疗退行性腰椎疾病
Orthop Surg. 2017 Aug;9(3):277-283. doi: 10.1111/os.12345.

引用本文的文献

1
Successful outcomes of unilateral bilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar interbody fusion: A meta-analysis with evidence grading.单侧与双侧椎弓根螺钉固定用于腰椎椎间融合术的成功结局:一项证据分级的Meta分析
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Dec 26;10(36):13337-13348. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i36.13337.
2
Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar fusion: A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses.单侧与双侧椎弓根螺钉固定在腰椎融合术中的比较:重叠荟萃分析的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 20;14(12):e0226848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226848. eCollection 2019.
3
Does the Cage Position in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Determine Unilateral versus Bilateral Screw Placement?: A Review of the Literature.
经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中的椎间融合器位置会决定单侧还是双侧螺钉置入吗?:文献综述
Asian Spine J. 2019 Apr;13(2):325-333. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0087. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
4
Is unilateral pedicle screw fixation superior than bilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysis.对于腰椎退行性疾病,单侧椎弓根螺钉固定是否优于双侧椎弓根螺钉固定:一项荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Nov 22;13(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-1004-x.
5
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UNILIF): morbidity, clinical and radiological 2-year outcomes of a 66-patient prospective series.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术联合单侧椎弓根螺钉固定(UNILIF):66例患者前瞻性系列研究的2年发病率、临床及影像学结果
Eur Spine J. 2018 Aug;27(8):1933-1939. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5452-5. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
6
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Unilateral Fixation for Degenerative Lumbar Disease.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术及单侧固定治疗退行性腰椎疾病
Orthop Surg. 2017 Aug;9(3):277-283. doi: 10.1111/os.12345.
7
Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: A meta-analysis.单侧与双侧椎弓根螺钉固定联合后路腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 May;96(21):e6882. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006882.
8
Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation with Bone Graft vs. Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation with Bone Graft or Cage: A Comparative Study.单侧椎弓根螺钉固定联合植骨与双侧椎弓根螺钉固定联合植骨或椎间融合器的比较研究
Med Sci Monit. 2016 Mar 18;22:890-7. doi: 10.12659/msm.897639.
9
Minimally invasive unilateral versus bilateral technique in performing single-segment pedicle screw fixation and lumbar interbody fusion.单节段椎弓根螺钉固定及腰椎椎间融合术中微创单侧与双侧技术比较
J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Jul 16;10:112. doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0253-1.
10
Quality and Quantity of Published Studies Evaluating Lumbar Fusion during the Past 10 Years: A Systematic Review.过去 10 年评估腰椎融合术的发表研究的质量和数量:系统评价。
Global Spine J. 2015 Jun;5(3):207-18. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1552984.