Diogo Isabell, Franke Nora, Steinbach-Hundt Silke, Mandapathil Magis, Weiss Rainer, Werner J A, Güldner Christian
Cochlear Implants Int. 2014 Mar;15(2):112-7. doi: 10.1179/1754762813Y.0000000035. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
Accurate radiological evaluation of cochlear implants is essential for improvement of devices and techniques and also for assessing the position of the electrodes within the cochlea. Radiological study of implants has focused on isolated temporal bones. Previous studies showed relevant sizes of artefacts (dimensions of the radiological image compared with the actual dimensions of the electrode) in visualization of cochlear implants in computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). In this study, we aimed to obtain CBCT images of cochlear electrodes in isolated temporal bones and in whole heads and to assess the differences in image quality between the two.
Cochlear electrodes were implanted in three complete human heads. Radiological examinations were performed using a single CBCT scanner with varying x-ray tube currents, voltages, and rotation angles. The temporal bones were then removed and the same radiological examinations were repeated, with and without the receiver coils. Artefacts from a basal electrode (electrode 9) and an apical electrode (electrode 2) were calculated. These were compared with each other by measuring the diameter of the image of the electrode (electrode inclusive of imaging artefacts) and with the real electrode diameters from the manufacturer's data. Additionally, the radiological diameters (inclusive of artefact) of the electrodes were compared to the cross-sectional diameters of the basal and apical coils of the cochlea at the locations of these two electrodes.
In comparison to the real electrode diameters, radiological artefact proportions of 51-58% for electrode 9 and 56-61% for electrode 2 were calculated. The differences between whole head images (group 1) and temporal bone images with and without the receiver coil (groups 2 and 3) were highly significant for each protocol (P < 0.001).
These results indicate that it is not possible reliably to determine the exact intracochlear positions of electrodes using CBCT. Imaging of isolated temporal bones produced significantly greater artefacts than imaging of the whole head. Evaluations of image quality based only on results for isolated temporal bones are not transferable to clinical situations, and should be assessed critically.
对人工耳蜗进行准确的影像学评估对于改进设备和技术以及评估电极在耳蜗内的位置至关重要。人工耳蜗的影像学研究主要集中在孤立的颞骨上。先前的研究表明,在计算机断层扫描和锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)中观察人工耳蜗时,存在明显的伪影大小(影像学图像尺寸与电极实际尺寸相比)。在本研究中,我们旨在获取孤立颞骨和完整头部中人工耳蜗电极的CBCT图像,并评估两者之间图像质量的差异。
将人工耳蜗电极植入三个完整的人类头部。使用具有不同X射线管电流、电压和旋转角度的单一CBCT扫描仪进行影像学检查。然后取出颞骨,并在有和没有接收线圈的情况下重复相同的影像学检查。计算来自基底电极(电极9)和顶端电极(电极2)的伪影。通过测量电极图像(包括成像伪影的电极)的直径并与制造商数据中的实际电极直径进行比较,将这些伪影相互比较。此外,将电极的影像学直径(包括伪影)与这两个电极位置处耳蜗基底和顶端线圈的横截面直径进行比较。
与实际电极直径相比,计算出电极9的影像学伪影比例为51 - 58%,电极2的为56 - 61%。对于每个方案,完整头部图像(第1组)与有和没有接收线圈的颞骨图像(第2组和第3组)之间的差异非常显著(P < 0.001)。
这些结果表明,使用CBCT无法可靠地确定电极在耳蜗内的确切位置。孤立颞骨的成像产生的伪影明显多于完整头部的成像。仅基于孤立颞骨结果的图像质量评估不能直接应用于临床情况,应进行严格评估。