• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

旋转锉和手用锉在乳磨牙根管清理中的效果

Root canal cleaning efficacy of rotary and hand files instrumentation in primary molars.

作者信息

Nazari Moghaddam Kiumars, Mehran Majid, Farajian Zadeh Hamideh

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Dental School, Shahed University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Iran Endod J. 2009 Spring;4(2):53-7. Epub 2009 Apr 17.

PMID:23940486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3740130/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Pulpectomy of primary teeth is commonly carried out with hand files and broaches; a tricky and time consuming procedure. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the cleaning efficacy and time taken for instrumentation of deciduous molars using hand K-files and Flex Master rotary system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, 68 canals of 23 extracted primary molars with at least two third intact roots and 7-12 mm length were selected. After preparing an access cavity, K-file size #15 was introduced into the root canal and India ink was injected with an insulin syringe. Sixty samples were randomly divided in to experimental groups in group I (n=30), root canals were prepared with hand K-files; in group II (n=30), rotary Flex Master files were used for instrumentation, and in group III 8 remained samples were considered as negative controls. After clearing and root sectioning, the removal of India ink from cervical, middle, and apical thirds was scored. Data was analyzed using student's T-test and Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between experimental groups cleaning efficacy at the cervical, middle and apical root canal thirds. Only the coronal third scored higher in the hand instrumented group (P<0.001). Instrumentation with Flex Master rotary files was significantly less time consuming (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although there was no difference in cleanliness efficacy at the apical and middle thirds, the coronal third was more effectively cleaned with hand files. Predictably, time efficiency was a significant advantage with rotary technique.

摘要

引言

乳牙根管治疗通常使用手动锉和根管扩大针进行,这是一个棘手且耗时的过程。本体外研究的目的是比较使用手动K锉和Flex Master旋转系统对乳磨牙进行根管预备时的清洁效果和所需时间。

材料与方法

在本研究中,选取了23颗拔除的乳磨牙的68个根管,这些根管至少有三分之二的根完整,长度为7 - 12毫米。制备开髓洞形后,将15号K锉插入根管,并用胰岛素注射器注入印度墨水。60个样本随机分为实验组,其中I组(n = 30),用手动K锉进行根管预备;II组(n = 30),使用Flex Master旋转锉进行根管预备,III组8个剩余样本作为阴性对照。在清理和根管切片后,对从根管颈段、中段和根尖段去除印度墨水的情况进行评分。使用学生t检验和曼-惠特尼U检验分析数据。

结果

实验组在根管颈段、中段和根尖段的清洁效果之间无显著差异。仅在手动预备组中,冠段的评分更高(P < 0.001)。使用Flex Master旋转锉进行根管预备耗时显著更少(P < 0.001)。

结论

尽管在根尖段和中段的清洁效果上没有差异,但手动锉在冠段的清洁更有效。可以预见,旋转技术在时间效率方面具有显著优势。

相似文献

1
Root canal cleaning efficacy of rotary and hand files instrumentation in primary molars.旋转锉和手用锉在乳磨牙根管清理中的效果
Iran Endod J. 2009 Spring;4(2):53-7. Epub 2009 Apr 17.
2
Comparison of Cleaning Efficacy and Instrumentation Time in Primary Molars: Mtwo Rotary Instruments vs. Hand K-Files.乳牙清洁效果与操作时间的比较:Mtwo旋转器械与手动K锉的对比
Iran Endod J. 2015 Fall;10(4):240-3. doi: 10.7508/iej.2015.04.006.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Capacity and Efficiency of Kedo-S Pediatric Rotary Files, Rotary ProTaper, and Hand K Files in Primary Molar Pulpectomy.Kedo-S儿童旋转锉、旋转ProTaper锉和手动K锉在乳牙牙髓摘除术中的清洁能力和效率的比较评估
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 May-Jun;14(3):383-387. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1958.
4
Comparative evaluation of instrumentation timing and cleaning efficacy in extracted primary molars using manual and NiTi rotary technique - Invitro study.使用手动和镍钛旋转技术对拔除的乳磨牙进行器械操作时机和清洁效果的比较评估——体外研究。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;9(2):151-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
5
Comparison of cleaning Efficacy and Instrumentation Time between Rotary and Manual Instrumentation Techniques in Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study.乳牙旋转与手动器械操作技术的清洁效果及操作时间比较:一项体外研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016 Apr-Jun;9(2):124-7. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1347. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
6
Comparison of rotary and manual instrumentation techniques on cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in deciduous molars.乳牙磨牙旋转与手动器械预备技术在清洁能力和器械预备时间方面的比较。
J Dent Child (Chic). 2004 Jan-Apr;71(1):45-7.
7
Clinical evaluation of instrumentation time and quality of obturation using paediatric hand and rotary file systems with conventional hand K-files for pulpectomy in primary mandibular molars: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.使用儿童手动和旋转锉系统与传统手动K锉进行下颌乳磨牙牙髓摘除术时的操作时间及根管充填质量的临床评估:一项双盲随机对照试验
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Dec;21(6):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s40368-020-00518-w. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
8
Evaluation of root canal cleaning efficacy of selfadjusting files, protaper rotary, and manual K-Files in primary teeth - An Comparative study.评价不同根管锉在儿童乳牙根管治疗中根管清理效果的临床研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2023 Jan-Mar;34(1):65-68. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_66_22.
9
Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals.旋转Mtwo系统与手动K锉器械:在预备乳磨牙和恒牙磨牙根管中的疗效
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Mar-Apr;22(2):363. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.84283.
10
Evaluation of the efficacy of rotary vs. hand files in root canal preparation of primary teeth in vitro using CBCT.使用CBCT在体外评估旋转锉与手动锉在乳牙根管预备中的疗效。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2014 Apr;15(2):113-20. doi: 10.1007/s40368-013-0072-1. Epub 2013 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric Rotary Endodontic Files in Primary Teeth (2000-2025): A Scoping Review of Design, Evidence, and Clinical Use.乳牙用儿童旋转根管锉(2000 - 2025年):设计、证据及临床应用的范围综述
Cureus. 2025 Jun 11;17(6):e85775. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85775. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Evaluation of the shaping effectiveness of three different rotary systems and hand files in primary molars: a micro-CT in vitro study.三种不同旋转系统和手动锉在乳磨牙根管预备中的成形效果评估:一项体外显微CT研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 26;25(1):803. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06208-7.
3
Comparison of Hand Files, Mtwo, Reciproc, and Gentlefile Rotary Systems Regarding Canal Transportation, Centering Ability, and Obturation Quality of Primary Molars.

本文引用的文献

1
SEM Study of Root Canal Walls Cleanliness after Ni-Ti Rotary and Hand Instrumentation.镍钛旋转器械和手动器械预备后根管壁清洁度的扫描电子显微镜研究
Iran Endod J. 2007 Spring;2(1):5-10. Epub 2007 Apr 1.
2
The principles of techniques for cleaning root canals.根管清理技术的原则
Aust Dent J. 2007 Mar;52(1 Suppl):S52-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.tb00526.x.
3
A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of AET instruments and K-flexofiles.使用AET器械和K型锉后残留碎屑及玷污层的扫描电子显微镜研究
手用锉、Mtwo、Reciproc和Gentlefile旋转系统在乳牙根管偏移、定心能力和充填质量方面的比较
J Dent (Shiraz). 2025 Mar 1;26(1):76-87. doi: 10.30476/dentjods.2024.100763.2247. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Comparative Evaluation of Rotary and Hand File Systems for Optimal Obturation in Primary Molar Root Canal Treatment: A Pediatric Perspective.旋转锉系统与手动锉系统在乳牙根管治疗中最佳根管充填效果的比较评估:从儿科角度分析
Cureus. 2025 Feb 11;17(2):e78860. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78860. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Comparative Evaluation of Cutting Efficiency of Three File Systems-Kedo-SH Manual, Pedoflex Rotary, and Manual K File: An Study.三种锉系统(Kedo-SH手动锉、Pedoflex旋转锉和手动K锉)切割效率的比较评估:一项研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S239-S242. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_477_23. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
6
Volumetric Analysis of Various Pediatric Rotary Files in the Preparation of Primary Root Canals Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描对各种儿童旋转锉预备乳牙根尖根管进行容积分析。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Jan;17(1):15-20. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2724.
7
Endodontic treatment of a C-shaped mandibular second molar with narrow dentinal thickness: A case report.牙本质厚度狭窄的下颌C形第二磨牙的根管治疗:病例报告
Clin Case Rep. 2024 Feb 14;12(2):e8505. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.8505. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
Comparative Evaluation of Instrumentation Time and Quality of Obturation amongst Pediatric Rotary Endodontic System: An Study.儿童旋转牙髓治疗系统根管预备时间与充填质量的比较评估:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Mar-Apr;16(2):338-343. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2573.
9
Evaluation and Comparison of Effectiveness of Kedo-S Pediatric Rotary Files vs Manual Instrumentation for Root Canal Treatment in Primary Molars.Kedo-S儿童旋转锉与手动器械用于乳磨牙根管治疗的有效性评估与比较
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Jan-Feb;16(1):22-29. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2511.
10
Microbial Evaluation of Root Canals after Biomechanical Preparation with Manual K-files, Manual H-files, and Kedo-SG Blue Rotary Files: An Study.使用手动K锉、手动H锉和Kedo-SG Blue旋转锉进行根管生物力学预备后根管的微生物学评估:一项研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Nov-Dec;15(6):687-690. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2457.
Stomatologija. 2006;8(3):70-5.
4
An in vitro comparative study of apically extruded debris resulting from conventional and three rotary (Profile, Race, FlexMaster) instrumentation techniques.一项关于传统和三种旋转(Profile、Race、FlexMaster)根管预备技术所产生的根尖部挤出碎屑的体外对比研究。
J Oral Sci. 2006 Jun;48(2):85-8. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.48.85.
5
Success rate of root canal treatment in primary molars.乳牙根管治疗的成功率
J Dent. 2005 Jan;33(1):41-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.07.009.
6
Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol, and Vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth.氧化锌丁香油糊剂与Vitapex用于坏死乳牙根管治疗的比较
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2004 Nov;14(6):417-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2004.00544.x.
7
Comparison of rotary and manual instrumentation techniques on cleaning capacity and instrumentation time in deciduous molars.乳牙磨牙旋转与手动器械预备技术在清洁能力和器械预备时间方面的比较。
J Dent Child (Chic). 2004 Jan-Apr;71(1):45-7.
8
A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments.使用Profile.04和LightSpeed旋转镍钛器械进行根管预备的比较研究。
Int Endod J. 2002 Jan;35(1):37-46. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00454.x.
9
Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth.镍钛旋转锉在乳牙根管预备中的应用。
Pediatr Dent. 2000 Jan-Feb;22(1):77-8.
10
An analysis of canal centering using mechanical instrumentation techniques.使用机械器械技术对根管居中情况的分析。
J Endod. 1999 Jun;25(6):441-5. doi: 10.1016/s0099-2399(99)80275-1.