Lakshmanan Lakshimi, Jeevanandan Ganesh
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Nov-Dec;15(6):687-690. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2457.
The purpose of the present study was to comparatively evaluate the efficacy of Kedo-SG blue rotary files, manual K-files, and manual H-files in eliminating the root canal microflora of primary molars.
Forty-five primary molars requiring pulpectomy were included in the study. Based on type of instrumentation, the teeth were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: group A: Kedo-SG blue rotary files, group B: manual H-files, and group C: manual K-files. Sterile absorbent paper points were used for sample collection and stored in sterile Eppendorf tubes containing saline as transport medium. Culturing was done on thioglycolate agar and blood agar media for the cultivation of anaerobic and aerobic microbes, respectively, and recorded as colony-forming units (CFU) using digital colony counter. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test were performed for statistical analysis.
Postinstrumentation, 93-96% reduction of aerobic and anaerobic microbial count was recorded in group A. Whereas, it was 87-91% reduction in group B and 90-91% reduction in group C. No statistically significant difference was noted between the three groups.
Kedo-SG blue rotary files showed a better reduction of microbes in root canals when compared to manual instrumentation. However, there was no significant difference between manual and rotary instrumentation in microbial reduction of primary root canals.
Lakshmanan L, Jeevanandan G. Microbial Evaluation of Root Canals after Biomechanical Preparation with Manual K-files, Manual H-files, and Kedo-SG Blue Rotary Files: An Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(6):687-690.
本研究旨在比较评估凯多-SG蓝色旋转锉、手动K锉和手动H锉在清除乳磨牙根管微生物群方面的疗效。
本研究纳入了45颗需要进行牙髓摘除术的乳磨牙。根据器械类型,将牙齿随机分为三组之一:A组:凯多-SG蓝色旋转锉;B组:手动H锉;C组:手动K锉。使用无菌吸水纸尖进行样本采集,并储存在含有生理盐水作为运输介质的无菌艾本德管中。分别在硫乙醇酸盐琼脂和血琼脂培养基上进行培养以培养厌氧和好氧微生物,并使用数字菌落计数器记录为菌落形成单位(CFU)。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和单因素方差分析(ANOVA)进行统计分析。
器械操作后,A组需氧和厌氧微生物数量减少了93%-96%。而B组减少了87%-91%,C组减少了90%-91%。三组之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。
与手动器械相比,凯多-SG蓝色旋转锉在根管内微生物减少方面表现更好。然而,在乳磨牙根管微生物减少方面,手动器械和旋转器械之间没有显著差异。
Lakshmanan L, Jeevanandan G. 用手动K锉、手动H锉和凯多-SG蓝色旋转锉进行生物力学预备后根管的微生物评估:一项研究。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2022;15(6):687-690。