• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of removed dentin thickness with hand and rotary instruments.使用手动器械和旋转器械时去除牙本质厚度的比较。
Iran Endod J. 2009 Spring;4(2):69-73. Epub 2009 Apr 17.
2
Residual dentin thickness in mesial roots of mandibular molars prepared with Lightspeed rotary instruments and Gates-Glidden reamers.使用LightSpeed旋转器械和Gates-Glidden扩孔钻制备的下颌磨牙近中根中的剩余牙本质厚度。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003 Sep;96(3):351-5. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(02)91710-5.
3
A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of apical root canal preparation using three instrumentation techniques.三种根管预备器械在根尖部根管预备中的微焦点 CT 评价
Int Endod J. 2009 Dec;42(12):1057-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01626.x.
4
Centering ability and dentin removal of rotary systems in curved root canals.弯曲根管中旋转系统的定心能力和牙本质去除情况
Iran Endod J. 2009 Summer;4(3):91-5. Epub 2009 Jul 6.
5
A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators.新手操作者对根管进行预备时，镍钛旋转GT锉与传统器械的计算机断层扫描重建对比。
Int Endod J. 2001 Sep;34(6):476-84. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00422.x.
6
Comparison of dentine removal using V-taper and K-Flexofile instruments.比较 V 型和 K 型 Flexofile 器械去除牙本质的效果。
Int Endod J. 2010 Nov;43(11):1029-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01769.x.
7
Ex vivo study on root canal instrumentation of two rotary nickel-titanium systems in comparison to stainless steel hand instruments.两种旋转镍钛系统与不锈钢手动器械相比的根管预备离体研究。
Int Endod J. 2009 Jan;42(1):22-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01489.x.
8
Evaluation of the Self-Adjusting File system (SAF) for the instrumentation of primary molar root canals: a micro-computed tomographic study.评价适用于乳磨牙根管预备的自调整锉（SAF）系统：一项显微 CT 研究。
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2017 Jun;18(2):105-110. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.02.04.
9
Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.使用计算机断层扫描评估，比较使用Hero 642旋转镍钛器械与不锈钢手动K锉进行根管预备的情况。
Int Endod J. 2005 Jun;38(6):402-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00961.x.
10
In vitro evaluation of root canal preparation using oscillatory and rotary systems in flattened root canals.使用振荡和旋转系统对扁平根管进行根管预备的体外评估。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2007 Feb;15(1):65-9. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572007000100014.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Remaining Dentin Thickness Using Manual Protapers, Protaper Gold, and Reciprocating Waveone Gold in Single-Rooted Teeth With Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: An In-Vitro Study.使用手动ProTaper、ProTaper Gold和往复式WaveOne Gold在单根牙中通过锥形束计算机断层扫描评估剩余牙本质厚度的比较：一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2024 Dec 30;16(12):e76610. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76610. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Solite RS3 and HyFlex Remover Retreatment Files in Conserving Remaining Dentin Thickness During Endodontic Retreatment Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Analysis.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描在根管再治疗中对Solite RS3和HyFlex Remover再治疗锉在保留剩余牙本质厚度方面的比较评估：一项体外分析。
Cureus. 2024 Apr 8;16(4):e57805. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57805. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Comparative evaluation of pericervical dentin preservation and fracture resistance of root canal-treated teeth with rotary endodontic file systems of different types of taper - An study.不同锥度旋转根管锉系统对根管治疗后牙齿颈周牙本质保存及抗折性的比较评价——一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2023 Jul-Aug;26(4):429-433. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_255_23. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
4
Comparative in vitro evaluation of remaining dentine thickness following instrumentation with hand and rotary endodontic files during pulpectomy in primary molars: a systematic review.在乳磨牙牙髓切断术中，手用和机用根管锉器械预备后剩余牙本质厚度的体外比较评估：系统评价。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2023 Feb;24(1):15-32. doi: 10.1007/s40368-022-00760-4. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
5
A comparative evaluation of remaining dentin thickness following biomechanical preparation of teeth using different rotary file systems: An study.使用不同旋转锉系统对牙齿进行生物力学预备后剩余牙本质厚度的比较评估：一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2022 Jan-Feb;25(1):32-36. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_373_21. Epub 2022 May 2.
6
Comparative evaluation of canal transportation, centering ability, and dentin removal between ProTaper Gold, One Curve, and Profit S3: An study.ProTaper Gold、One Curve和Profit S3之间根管偏移、定心能力及牙本质去除的比较评估：一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2020 Nov-Dec;23(6):632-636. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_619_20. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
7
Comparison of Dentinal Wall Thickness in the Furcation Area (Danger Zone) in the First and Second Mesiobuccal Canals in the Maxillary First and Second Molars Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描比较上颌第一和第二磨牙的第一和第二近中颊根管分叉区（危险区）的牙本质壁厚度。
Eur Endod J. 2020 Apr 24;5(2):81-85. doi: 10.14744/eej.2020.18189. eCollection 2020.
8
Comparative Evaluation of Efficiency of Different File Systems in Terms of Remaining Dentin Thickness Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: An Study.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描根据剩余牙本质厚度对不同文件系统效率的比较评估：一项研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Jul-Sep;9(3):367-371. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_72_18.
9
Comparison of Hero 642 and K3 rotary nickel-titanium files in curved canals of molars and a systematic review of the literature.Hero 642与K3旋转镍钛锉在磨牙弯曲根管中的比较及文献系统评价
Exp Ther Med. 2014 Oct;8(4):1047-1054. doi: 10.3892/etm.2014.1853. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
10
A Survey on NiTi Rotary Instruments Usage by Endodontists and General Dentist in Tehran.德黑兰牙髓病医生和普通牙医对镍钛旋转器械使用情况的调查
Iran Endod J. 2011 Fall;6(4):168-75. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of remaining dentine structure and thermal-mechanical aging on the fracture resistance of bovine roots with different post and core systems.剩余牙本质结构及热机械老化对不同桩核系统牛牙根抗折性能的影响。
Int Endod J. 2008 Nov;41(11):969-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01459.x.
2
A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of AET instruments and K-flexofiles.使用AET器械和K型锉后残留碎屑及玷污层的扫描电子显微镜研究
Stomatologija. 2006;8(3):70-5.
3
Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology.牙髓病治疗质量指南：欧洲牙髓病学会共识报告
Int Endod J. 2006 Dec;39(12):921-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01180.x.
4
Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study.使用解剖学牙髓治疗技术、Profile器械和手动器械清理椭圆形根管的效果：一项扫描电子显微镜研究。
Int Endod J. 2005 Jun;38(6):356-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00938.x.
5
Effect of root canal size and external root surface morphology on fracture susceptibility and pattern: a finite element analysis.根管尺寸和牙根外表面形态对骨折易感性及模式的影响：有限元分析
J Endod. 2005 Apr;31(4):288-92. doi: 10.1097/01.don.0000140579.17573.f7.
6
A comparison of the effects of two canal preparation techniques on root fracture susceptibility and fracture pattern.两种根管预备技术对牙根骨折易感性和骨折类型影响的比较。
J Endod. 2005 Apr;31(4):283-7. doi: 10.1097/01.don.0000140580.03121.61.
7
The impact of post space preparation with Gates-Glidden drills on residual dentin thickness in distal roots of mandibular molars.使用盖茨-格利登钻进行根管预备后对下颌磨牙远中根剩余牙本质厚度的影响。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 Jul;135(7):903-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0336.
8
A combined radiographic and computerized scanning method to evaluate remaining dentine thickness in mandibular incisors after various intracanal procedures.一种结合放射照相和计算机扫描的方法，用于评估下颌切牙在各种根管内操作后的剩余牙本质厚度。
Int Endod J. 2003 Oct;36(10):682-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00714.x.
9
Residual dentin thickness in mesial roots of mandibular molars prepared with Lightspeed rotary instruments and Gates-Glidden reamers.使用LightSpeed旋转器械和Gates-Glidden扩孔钻制备的下颌磨牙近中根中的剩余牙本质厚度。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003 Sep;96(3):351-5. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(02)91710-5.
10
A comparison of stainless steel hand and rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation using a silicone impression technique.使用硅橡胶印模技术对不锈钢手动器械和旋转镍钛器械进行的比较。
Aust Dent J. 2002 Mar;47(1):12-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2002.tb00297.x.

使用手动器械和旋转器械时去除牙本质厚度的比较。

Comparison of removed dentin thickness with hand and rotary instruments.

作者信息

Shahriari Shahriar, Abedi Hasan, Hashemi Mahdi, Jalalzadeh Seyed Mohsen

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Dental School, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.

出版信息

Iran Endod J. 2009 Spring;4(2):69-73. Epub 2009 Apr 17.

PMID:23940489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3740133/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of dentine removed after canal preparation using stainless steel (SS) hand instruments or rotary ProFile instruments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six extracted human teeth with root canal curvatures less than 30º were embedded in clear polyester resin. The roots were cut horizontally at apical 2, 4 and 7 mm. Dentin thickness was measured at each section and the sections were accurately reassembled using a muffle. Root canals were randomly prepared by SS hand instruments or rotary ProFile instruments. Root sections were again separated, and the remaining dentin thickness was measured. Mann-Whitney U and t tests were performed for analytic comparison of the results.

RESULTS

The thickness of removed dentin was significantly different between the two used methods (P<0.05). Significantly greater amounts of dentin was removed mesially in all sections in hand instrumentation group (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

ProFile rotary instrumentation prepares root canals with a greater conservation of tooth structure.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是评估使用不锈钢（SS）手动器械或旋转ProFile器械进行根管预备后去除的牙本质量。

材料与方法

将三十六颗根管弯曲度小于30°的拔除人牙嵌入透明聚酯树脂中。在根尖2、4和7毫米处水平切断牙根。在每个切片处测量牙本质厚度，并使用马弗炉精确重新组装切片。根管随机使用SS手动器械或旋转ProFile器械进行预备。再次分离牙根切片，并测量剩余牙本质厚度。进行曼-惠特尼U检验和t检验以对结果进行分析比较。

结果

两种使用方法之间去除的牙本质厚度有显著差异（P<0.05）。手动器械组所有切片中近中方向去除的牙本质量显著更多（P<0.001）。

结论

ProFile旋转器械预备根管时能更好地保留牙齿结构。