• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

皮损皮肤中的皮肤免疫反应物与系统性红斑狼疮的血清紊乱和疾病活动的相关性。

Correlation of cutaneous immunoreactants in lesional skin with the serological disorders and disease activity of systemic lupus erythematosus.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Aug 5;8(8):e70983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070983. Print 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0070983
PMID:23940681
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3733635/
Abstract

Detection of immunoreactants including IgG, IgM, IgA, and C3 by direct immunofluorescence (DIF) from skin is useful for distinguishing lupus lesions from other skin disorders. Despite their diagnostic value, the type and number of cutaneous immunoreactants as they relate to serological disorders and disease severity has been poorly studied. We examined 36 patients with systemic lupus erythematosis (SLE) with positive DIF (DIF+) and 28 patients with negative DIF (DIF-) tests performed on lesional skin. Among DIF+ patients, the most frequent patterns of immunoreactants were IgM alone (36%) and the coexistence of IgM with C3 (28%). IgM was the highest detected individual immunoreactant (86%). As classified by number, 17 of 36 DIF+ patients had one immunoreactant (= 1), while the remaining patients had two to four immunoreactants (>1). Compared with DIF- patients, DIF+ patients were more likely to have severe disease as indicated by lower serum C3 levels and a higher SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI). The coexistence of IgM with any other immunoreactants indicated a more severe disease than that present in the DIF- group, whereas the IgM-alone group was comparable with the DIF- group in both serum C3 levels and SLEDAI. These findings were also applicable in the comparison of patients with more than one (>1) immunoreactant and patients with no (DIF-) and one ( = 1) immunoreactant. Collectively, the presence of multiple immunoreactants in lesional skin implies a more severe disease activity of SLE, while a single immunoreactant may be equal to the absence of immunoreactants (DIF-) in terms of predicting disease activity.

摘要

通过直接免疫荧光法(DIF)从皮肤中检测包括 IgG、IgM、IgA 和 C3 在内的免疫反应物,有助于将狼疮病变与其他皮肤疾病区分开来。尽管它们具有诊断价值,但与血清学异常和疾病严重程度相关的皮肤免疫反应物的类型和数量尚未得到充分研究。我们检查了 36 例皮肤直接免疫荧光检测阳性(DIF+)的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者和 28 例皮肤直接免疫荧光检测阴性(DIF-)的患者。在 DIF+患者中,最常见的免疫反应物模式是单独的 IgM(36%)和 IgM 与 C3 共存(28%)。IgM 是检测到的最高的单个免疫反应物(86%)。按数量分类,36 例 DIF+患者中有 17 例(=1)存在一种免疫反应物,其余患者有两种或四种免疫反应物(>1)。与 DIF-患者相比,DIF+患者的血清 C3 水平较低,SLE 疾病活动指数(SLEDAI)较高,表明疾病更严重。与 DIF-组相比,IgM 与任何其他免疫反应物共存表明疾病更严重,而 IgM 单独组在血清 C3 水平和 SLEDAI 方面与 DIF-组相似。这些发现也适用于比较存在多种(>1)免疫反应物的患者和无(DIF-)和一种(=1)免疫反应物的患者。总之,皮肤病变中存在多种免疫反应物提示 SLE 的疾病活动更为严重,而单一免疫反应物与无免疫反应物(DIF-)在预测疾病活动方面可能相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dda3/3733635/cde7f465970c/pone.0070983.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dda3/3733635/e38c6dfd2355/pone.0070983.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dda3/3733635/e77e89ddfb6a/pone.0070983.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dda3/3733635/cde7f465970c/pone.0070983.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dda3/3733635/e38c6dfd2355/pone.0070983.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dda3/3733635/e77e89ddfb6a/pone.0070983.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dda3/3733635/cde7f465970c/pone.0070983.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Correlation of cutaneous immunoreactants in lesional skin with the serological disorders and disease activity of systemic lupus erythematosus.皮损皮肤中的皮肤免疫反应物与系统性红斑狼疮的血清紊乱和疾病活动的相关性。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 5;8(8):e70983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070983. Print 2013.
2
The gender disparity of immunoreactants in lesional skin of lupus erythematosus patients.狼疮红斑患者皮损处免疫反应物的性别差异。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012 Jan-Feb;30(1):103-5. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
3
Immunoglobulin M predominance in cutaneous lupus erythematosus.皮肤红斑狼疮中免疫球蛋白M占优势。
J Cutan Pathol. 2005 May;32(5):352-5. doi: 10.1111/j.0303-6987.2005.00337.x.
4
Deposition of membrane attack complex in cutaneous lesions of lupus erythematosus.膜攻击复合物在红斑狼疮皮肤病变中的沉积。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993 May;28(5 Pt 1):687-91. doi: 10.1016/0190-9622(93)70093-9.
5
Comparative Study of Direct Immunofluorescence in Discoid Lupus Erythematosus and Bullous Pemphigoid.盘状红斑狼疮和大疱性类天疱疮直接免疫荧光的比较研究
Am J Dermatopathol. 2016 Feb;38(2):121-3. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000000387.
6
The composition of the lupus band test (LBT) on the sun-protected non-lesional (SPNL) skin in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE).皮肤型红斑狼疮(CLE)患者在防晒的非皮损(SPNL)皮肤上进行狼疮带试验(LBT)的组成。
Lupus. 1999;8(9):755-60. doi: 10.1191/096120399678840945.
7
The utility of the lupus band test on sun-protected non-lesional skin for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus.狼疮带试验在防晒的非皮损皮肤上用于诊断系统性红斑狼疮的效用。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1999 Jul-Aug;17(4):427-32.
8
Direct immunofluorescence findings in livedoid vasculopathy: a 10-year study and literature review.活体样血管病变的直接免疫荧光检查结果:一项 10 年研究及文献回顾。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2021 Apr;46(3):525-531. doi: 10.1111/ced.14464. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
9
The lupus band test in oral mucosa, conjunctiva and skin.口腔黏膜、结膜和皮肤的狼疮带试验。
Br J Dermatol. 1989 Dec;121(6):743-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1989.tb08216.x.
10
The association of anti-annexin1 antibodies with the occurrence of skin lesions in systemic lupus erythematosus.抗膜联蛋白 A1 抗体与系统性红斑狼疮皮损发生的相关性。
Lupus. 2014 Feb;23(2):183-7. doi: 10.1177/0961203313513820. Epub 2013 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Presence of Cutaneous Complement Deposition Distinguishes between Immunological and Histological Features of Bullous Pemphigoid-Insights from a Retrospective Cohort Study.皮肤补体沉积的存在可区分大疱性类天疱疮的免疫学和组织学特征——一项回顾性队列研究的见解
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 3;9(12):3928. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123928.
2
Dermatologic Manifestations, Histologic Features and Disease Progression among Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Subtypes: A Prospective Observational Study in Asians.皮肤型红斑狼疮各亚型的皮肤表现、组织学特征及疾病进展:一项针对亚洲人的前瞻性观察研究
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Feb;11(1):131-147. doi: 10.1007/s13555-020-00471-y. Epub 2020 Dec 5.

本文引用的文献

1
The gender disparity of immunoreactants in lesional skin of lupus erythematosus patients.狼疮红斑患者皮损处免疫反应物的性别差异。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012 Jan-Feb;30(1):103-5. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
2
The lupus band test in systemic lupus erythematosus patients.狼疮带试验在系统性红斑狼疮患者中的应用。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2011 Jan 24;7:27-32. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S10145.
3
Lupus band test.
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2010 May-Jun;76(3):298-300. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.62983.
4
Lupus erythematosus: systemic and cutaneous manifestations.红斑狼疮:系统性和皮肤表现
Clin Dermatol. 2006 Sep-Oct;24(5):348-62. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2006.07.014.
5
Lupus band test and disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus: does it still matter?系统性红斑狼疮中的狼疮带试验与疾病活动度:它仍然重要吗?
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2006 May;31(3):358-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2006.02113.x.
6
Immunoglobulin M predominance in cutaneous lupus erythematosus.皮肤红斑狼疮中免疫球蛋白M占优势。
J Cutan Pathol. 2005 May;32(5):352-5. doi: 10.1111/j.0303-6987.2005.00337.x.
7
The composition of the lupus band test (LBT) on the sun-protected non-lesional (SPNL) skin in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE).皮肤型红斑狼疮(CLE)患者在防晒的非皮损(SPNL)皮肤上进行狼疮带试验(LBT)的组成。
Lupus. 1999;8(9):755-60. doi: 10.1191/096120399678840945.
8
Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus.更新美国风湿病学会系统性红斑狼疮分类的修订标准。
Arthritis Rheum. 1997 Sep;40(9):1725. doi: 10.1002/art.1780400928.
9
Direct immunofluorescence in lupus erythematosus (LE).红斑狼疮的直接免疫荧光检查。
Sao Paulo Med J. 1996 Mar-Apr;114(2):1141-7. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31801996000200007.
10
Deposition of membrane attack complex in cutaneous lesions of lupus erythematosus.膜攻击复合物在红斑狼疮皮肤病变中的沉积。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993 May;28(5 Pt 1):687-91. doi: 10.1016/0190-9622(93)70093-9.