Suppr超能文献

[精神分裂症患者的社会功能如何测量?]

[How is social functioning of schizophrenics measured?].

作者信息

Ikebuchi Emi

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Teikyo University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2013;115(6):570-85.

Abstract

Measuring social functioning of schizophrenics is becoming an important clinical issue in the era of community care, where persons with mental illness can live in the community. Neuro- and social-cognitive function studies on the outcome of schizophrenia focus on researching brain functioning, and social functioning is a co-primary outcome measure of intervention. In this review, the viewpoint of measuring social functioning is clarified, typical and recommended assessment scales are introduced, methods to be developed for measurement are discussed, and how to measure social functioning in clinical and research settings is summarized. The axes of classifying measures include functional capacity/real-world functioning, subjective/objective evaluation, and rating/observing behaviors. Six social functioning scales were chosen as recommended scales in the study of real-world functioning as a co-primary measure in NEMH-MATRICS. Almost all scales are objective rating with the interviewing of informants. The functional capacity or competence is evaluated in performance tasks. While the scale of processing tasks of everyday functioning (UPSA) was recommended in many studies, there is no standard for assessing social skills or social problem-solving skills, because these skills differ greatly depending on the sex, age, and culture. Intervening variables among neuro/social cognitive functioning, functional capacity, and real-world functioning are intrinsic motivation, meta-cognition, self-efficacy, expected support, and the environment and support which might decrease the association of basic cognition and the functional outcome. In a clinical setting, these intervening variables, hope and subjective evaluation of support needs, and life history regarding the previous capacity are needed as well as assessment scales to develop a plan for intervention. Objective assessment scales are useful for measuring the effects of intervention.

摘要

在社区护理时代,测量精神分裂症患者的社会功能正成为一个重要的临床问题,在这个时代,精神疾病患者可以生活在社区中。关于精神分裂症预后的神经和社会认知功能研究侧重于大脑功能的研究,而社会功能是干预的共同主要结果指标。在本综述中,阐明了测量社会功能的观点,介绍了典型和推荐的评估量表,讨论了有待开发的测量方法,并总结了在临床和研究环境中如何测量社会功能。分类测量的轴包括功能能力/现实世界功能、主观/客观评估以及对行为的评分/观察。在NEMH-MATRICS研究中,六个社会功能量表被选为现实世界功能研究中的推荐量表,作为共同主要指标。几乎所有量表都是通过对 informant 的访谈进行客观评分。在绩效任务中评估功能能力或能力。虽然许多研究推荐了日常功能处理任务量表(UPSA),但评估社交技能或社交问题解决技能没有标准,因为这些技能因性别、年龄和文化而异。神经/社会认知功能、功能能力和现实世界功能之间的中介变量是内在动机、元认知、自我效能感、预期支持以及可能减少基本认知与功能结果关联的环境和支持。在临床环境中,除了评估量表外,还需要这些中介变量、希望和对支持需求的主观评估以及关于先前能力的生活史,以制定干预计划。客观评估量表有助于测量干预效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验