Keefe Richard S E, Poe Margaret, Walker Trina M, Harvey Philip D
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006 Feb;28(2):260-9. doi: 10.1080/13803390500360539.
The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) assesses five different domains of cognitive function with six tests, and takes about 30-35 minutes to complete in patients with schizophrenia. Previous work has demonstrated the reliability of this measure, and its sensitivity to the deficits of schizophrenia. However, the relationship of this brief cognitive measure to functional outcome has not been determined. Further, future registration trials for potentially cognitive enhancing compounds may not only assess efficacy with cognitive performance measures, but with assessments of real-world functional outcome and functional capacity. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the BACS and a potential co-primary measure for treatment studies of cognition in schizophrenia, and to determine if such a measure accounts for significant variance in functioning beyond that provided by cognitive function. The current study assessed 60 patients with schizophrenia over the course of six months. Cognitive functions were measured with the BACS. Functional capacity was measured with the UCSD Performance-based Skills Assessment (UPSA). Real-world functional outcome was measured with the Independent Living Skills Inventory (ILSI). BACS composite scores were significantly correlated with functional capacity as measured by the UPSA (r = .65, df = 55, p < .001), and real-world functional outcome as assessed by the ILSI (r = .37, df = 56, p = .005). In multiple regression analyses, UPSA scores did not account for additional variance in real-world functioning beyond that accounted for by the BACS. These data suggest that brief cognitive assessments such as the BACS are able to assess aspects of cognition that are related to important functional measures in clinical trials of cognitive enhancement. They also suggest that the measures being considered as potential co-primary indicators of cognitive function for registration trials are significantly correlated with cognition as assessed by brief cognitive assessments.
精神分裂症认知简短评估(BACS)通过六项测试评估认知功能的五个不同领域,精神分裂症患者完成该评估大约需要30 - 35分钟。先前的研究已证明该测量方法的可靠性及其对精神分裂症缺陷的敏感性。然而,这种简短认知测量与功能结局之间的关系尚未确定。此外,未来针对潜在认知增强化合物的注册试验可能不仅会通过认知表现测量来评估疗效,还会通过对现实世界功能结局和功能能力的评估来进行。本研究的目的是确定BACS与精神分裂症认知治疗研究的潜在共同主要测量指标之间的关系,并确定这样一种测量指标是否能解释功能方面超出认知功能所提供的显著差异。本研究在六个月的时间里评估了60名精神分裂症患者。使用BACS测量认知功能。使用加州大学圣地亚哥分校基于表现的技能评估(UPSA)测量功能能力。使用独立生活技能量表(ILSI)测量现实世界功能结局。BACS综合得分与UPSA测量的功能能力显著相关(r = .65,自由度 = 55,p < .001),与ILSI评估的现实世界功能结局显著相关(r = .37,自由度 = 56,p = .005)。在多元回归分析中,UPSA得分并未解释现实世界功能中超出BACS所解释的额外差异。这些数据表明,像BACS这样的简短认知评估能够评估与认知增强临床试验中重要功能测量相关的认知方面。它们还表明,被视为注册试验认知功能潜在共同主要指标的测量方法与简短认知评估所评估的认知显著相关。