Bates B L, Kraft P M
Washington State University, Pullman.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1991 Oct;39(4):227-42. doi: 10.1080/00207149108409638.
30 low hypnotizable Ss were administered the Carleton Skills Training (CST) program, while 8 were assigned to a practice group. Prior to treatment, an attempt was made to facilitate training by altering the ecological conditions of the laboratory. All Ss were tested immediately after treatment, and trained Ss were retested after 5-7 months. Immediate training gains were large and were comparable in magnitude to those routinely found at Carleton University. In addition, (a) trained Ss responded comparably whether screened once or twice, (b) practice alone did not enhance hypnotic performance, and (c) natural high hypnotizable Ss obtained significantly larger Field Inventory of Hypnotic Depth (Field, 1965) scores than created high hypnotizables. Follow-up scores fell between scores posted at screening and immediately after training. Current findings are interpreted in the context of existing evidence concerning the CST program.
30名低催眠易感性的受试者接受了卡尔顿技能训练（CST）项目，而8名受试者被分配到一个练习组。在治疗前，尝试通过改变实验室的生态条件来促进训练。所有受试者在治疗后立即接受测试，接受训练的受试者在5至7个月后重新接受测试。即时训练效果显著，其幅度与卡尔顿大学常规发现的效果相当。此外，（a）接受训练的受试者无论筛选一次还是两次，反应都相当；（b）仅练习并不能提高催眠表现；（c）天生高催眠易感性的受试者在催眠深度现场量表（菲尔德，1965年）上的得分显著高于后天培养的高催眠易感性受试者。随访得分介于筛选时和训练后立即记录的得分之间。当前的研究结果是在有关CST项目的现有证据背景下进行解释的。
