• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双相障碍比较有效性研究中的治疗服务利用。

Use of treatment services in a comparative effectiveness study of bipolar disorder.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Nov 1;64(11):1119-26. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200479.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.201200479
PMID:23945956
Abstract

OBJECTIVE Bipolar disorder is a severe, chronic mental illness with a high incidence of medical and psychological comorbidities that make treatment and prevention of future episodes challenging. This study investigated the use of services among outpatients with bipolar disorder to further understanding of how to maximize and optimize personalization and accessibility of services for this difficult-to-treat population. METHODS The Lithium Treatment-Moderate Dose Use Study (LiTMUS) was a six-month multisite, comparative effectiveness trial that randomly assigned 283 individuals to receive lithium plus optimized care-defined as personalized, guideline-informed care-or optimized care without lithium. Relationships between treatment service utilization, captured by the Cornell Service Index, and demographic and illness characteristics were examined with generalized linear marginal models. RESULTS Analyses with complete data (week 12, N=246; week 24, N=236) showed that increased service utilization was related to more severe bipolar disorder symptoms, physical side effects, and psychiatric and general medical comorbidities. Middle-aged individuals and those living in the United States longer tended to use more services than younger individuals or recent immigrants, respectively. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that not all individuals with bipolar disorder seek treatment services at the same rate. Instead, specific clinical or demographic features may affect the degree to which one seeks treatment, conveying clinical and public health implications and highlighting the need for specific approaches to correct such discrepancies. Future research is needed to elucidate potential moderators of service utilization in bipolar disorder to ensure that those most in need of additional services utilize them.

摘要

目的

双相情感障碍是一种严重的慢性精神疾病,发病率高,伴有多种医学和心理共病,这使得治疗和预防未来发作具有挑战性。本研究调查了双相情感障碍门诊患者的服务利用情况,以进一步了解如何最大限度地提高和优化这一难以治疗人群的服务个性化和可及性。

方法

锂治疗中剂量使用研究(LiTMUS)是一项为期六个月的多地点、比较有效性试验,将 283 名个体随机分配到锂加优化护理组(定义为个性化、基于指南的护理)或无锂的优化护理组。使用广义线性边缘模型,对以 Cornell 服务指数(Cornell Service Index)捕捉的治疗服务利用与人口统计学和疾病特征之间的关系进行了分析。

结果

对完整数据(第 12 周,N=246;第 24 周,N=236)的分析显示,服务利用率的增加与更严重的双相情感障碍症状、身体副作用以及精神和一般医疗共病有关。中年个体和在美国居住时间较长的个体比年轻个体或新移民更倾向于使用更多的服务。

结论

这些数据表明,并非所有双相情感障碍患者都以相同的速度寻求治疗服务。相反,特定的临床或人口统计学特征可能会影响一个人寻求治疗的程度,这传达了临床和公共卫生方面的意义,并强调需要针对这些差异采取具体方法。未来的研究需要阐明双相情感障碍服务利用的潜在调节因素,以确保那些最需要额外服务的人能够利用这些服务。

相似文献

1
Use of treatment services in a comparative effectiveness study of bipolar disorder.双相障碍比较有效性研究中的治疗服务利用。
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Nov 1;64(11):1119-26. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200479.
2
Medical burden in bipolar disorder: findings from the Clinical and Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness for Bipolar Disorder study (Bipolar CHOICE).双相障碍的医疗负担:来自比较双相障碍有效性的临床和健康结局倡议(CHOICE 双相)研究的结果。
Bipolar Disord. 2015 Mar;17(2):212-23. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12243. Epub 2014 Aug 16.
3
Lithium treatment moderate-dose use study (LiTMUS) for bipolar disorder: a randomized comparative effectiveness trial of optimized personalized treatment with and without lithium.锂治疗双相障碍的中剂量使用研究(LiTMUS):一项优化个体化治疗联合和不联合锂的随机对照有效性试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;170(1):102-10. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12060751.
4
Using comparative effectiveness design to improve the generalizability of bipolar treatment trials data: contrasting LiTMUS baseline data with pre-existing placebo controlled trials.利用比较有效性设计提高双相治疗试验数据的推广性:将 LiTMUS 基线数据与现有安慰剂对照试验进行对比。
J Affect Disord. 2014 Jan;152-154:97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.05.052. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
5
Axis I psychiatric comorbidity and its relationship to historical illness variables in 288 patients with bipolar disorder.288例双相情感障碍患者的轴I精神共病及其与既往疾病变量的关系。
Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;158(3):420-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.420.
6
Bipolar I and II disorder residual symptoms: oxcarbazepine and carbamazepine as add-on treatment to lithium in a double-blind, randomized trial.双相I型和II型障碍残留症状:奥卡西平与卡马西平作为锂盐辅助治疗的双盲随机试验
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Feb 1;33(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.10.012. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
7
Medical comorbidity, acute medical care use in late-life bipolar disorder: a comparison of lithium, valproate, and other pharmacotherapies.医疗合并症,老年双相情感障碍中的急性医疗护理使用:锂盐、丙戊酸盐及其他药物治疗的比较
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015 Nov-Dec;37(6):528-32. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
8
Costs associated with attempted suicide among individuals with bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍患者自杀未遂相关的费用。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2010 Jun;13(2):87-92.
9
Functional status and somatization as predictors of medical offset in anxious and depressed patients.功能状态和躯体化作为焦虑和抑郁患者医疗抵消的预测因素。
Value Health. 2003 Jan-Feb;6(1):40-50. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.00148.x.
10
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of quetiapine and lithium monotherapy in adults in the acute phase of bipolar depression (EMBOLDEN I).喹硫平与锂盐单药治疗双相抑郁急性期成人患者的双盲、安慰剂对照研究(EMBOLDEN I)。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Feb;71(2):150-62. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04995gre. Epub 2010 Jan 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Lifestyle interventions targeting dietary habits and exercise in bipolar disorder: A systematic review.针对双相情感障碍患者饮食习惯和运动的生活方式干预:一项系统综述。
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Mar;74:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.12.006. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
2
Collaborative care psychiatrists' views on treating bipolar disorder in primary care: a qualitative study.协作护理精神科医生对在初级保健中治疗双相情感障碍的看法:一项定性研究。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014 Nov-Dec;36(6):575-80. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Aug 7.