Cui Qian, Vanman Eric J, Wei Dongtao, Yang Wenjing, Jia Lei, Zhang Qinglin
Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China, Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (Southwest University), Ministry of Education, China, and School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China, Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (Southwest University), Ministry of Education, China, and School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China, Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (Southwest University), Ministry of Education, China, and School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Oct;9(10):1472-80. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst134. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
The ability of a deceiver to track a victim's ongoing judgments about the truthfulness of the deceit can be critical for successful deception. However, no study has yet investigated the neural circuits underlying receiving a judgment about one's lie. To explore this issue, we used a modified Guilty Knowledge Test in a mock murder situation to simultaneously record the neural responses involved in producing deception and later when judgments of that deception were made. Producing deception recruited the bilateral inferior parietal lobules (IPLs), right ventral lateral prefrontal (VLPF) areas and right striatum, among which the activation of the right VLPF contributed mostly to diagnosing the identities of the participants, correctly diagnosing 81.25% of 'murderers' and 81.25% of 'innocents'. Moreover, the participant's response when their deception was successful uniquely recruited the right middle frontal gyrus, bilateral IPLs, bilateral orbitofrontal cortices, bilateral middle temporal gyrus and left cerebellum, among which the right IPL contributed mostly to diagnosing participants' identities, correctly diagnosing 93.75% of murderers and 87.5% of innocents. This study shows that neural activity associated with being a successful liar (or not) is a feasible indicator for detecting lies and may be more valid than neural activity associated with producing deception.
欺骗者追踪受害者对欺骗真实性的持续判断的能力对于成功欺骗至关重要。然而,尚未有研究调查接受关于自己谎言的判断背后的神经回路。为了探究这个问题,我们在模拟谋杀情境中使用了改良的有罪知识测试,以同时记录产生欺骗时以及随后对该欺骗进行判断时涉及的神经反应。产生欺骗激活了双侧顶下小叶(IPL)、右侧腹外侧前额叶(VLPF)区域和右侧纹状体,其中右侧VLPF的激活对识别参与者身份的贡献最大,正确识别了81.25%的“凶手”和81.25%的“无辜者”。此外,当参与者的欺骗成功时,其反应独特地激活了右侧额中回、双侧IPL、双侧眶额皮质、双侧颞中回和左侧小脑,其中右侧IPL对识别参与者身份的贡献最大,正确识别了93.75%的凶手和87.5%的无辜者。这项研究表明,与成功说谎(或未成功说谎)相关的神经活动是检测谎言的可行指标,可能比与产生欺骗相关的神经活动更有效。