• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[两种基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)模型对血培养分离细菌的鉴定性能]

[Performance of two matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) models for identification of bacteria isolated from blood culture].

作者信息

Itoh Eisuke, Watari Tomohisa, Azuma Yuka, Watanabe Naoki, Tomoda Yutaka, Akasaka Kazumi, Kino Shuichi

机构信息

Department of Medical Laboratory and Blood Center, Asahikawa Medical University Hospital, Asahikawa 078-8510, Japan.

出版信息

Rinsho Byori. 2013 May;61(5):382-9.

PMID:23947175
Abstract

We compared the results of two bacterial identification methods: 1) a traditional method based on phenotypic identification of the causative organism using gram-staining, culture and biochemical markers and 2) matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). A total of 111 isolates, including 107 strains of common bacteria species and 4 strains of 3 yeast species, were tested by the traditional method and MALDI-TOF MS method(VITEK MS and Micro flex LT). Data obtained using MALDI-TOF MS were classified as Level 1 and Level 2 according to the confidence level of identification results from the VITEK MS ver. 1.0 database (VITEK MS) and MALDI Biotyper ver. 2.0 database (Microflex LT). The proportions of measured samples identified as Level 1 were 98.2% with the VITEK MS database and 87.4% with the MALDI Biotyper database. The concordance rates of the traditional method were 93.7% with the VITEK MS database and 82.0% with the MALDI Biotyper database. Identification results of five strains were mismatched between the traditional method and MALDI-TOF MS. Their ribosomal RNA sequences were identical to the results obtained from MALDI-TOF MS. We concluded that the performance of VITEK MS is superior to that of the traditional method and Microflex LT.

摘要

我们比较了两种细菌鉴定方法的结果

1)一种基于使用革兰氏染色、培养和生化标记对致病微生物进行表型鉴定的传统方法,以及2)基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)。共有111株分离株,包括107株常见细菌菌株和4株3种酵母菌株,通过传统方法和MALDI-TOF MS方法(VITEK MS和Micro flex LT)进行了检测。根据VITEK MS ver. 1.0数据库(VITEK MS)和MALDI Biotyper ver. 2.0数据库(Microflex LT)的鉴定结果置信水平,将使用MALDI-TOF MS获得的数据分类为1级和2级。使用VITEK MS数据库鉴定为1级的被测样本比例为98.2%,使用MALDI Biotyper数据库的比例为87.4%。传统方法与VITEK MS数据库的一致性率为93.7%,与MALDI Biotyper数据库的一致性率为82.0%。传统方法与MALDI-TOF MS之间有5株菌株的鉴定结果不匹配。它们的核糖体RNA序列与从MALDI-TOF MS获得的结果相同。我们得出结论,VITEK MS的性能优于传统方法和Microflex LT。

相似文献

1
[Performance of two matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) models for identification of bacteria isolated from blood culture].[两种基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)模型对血培养分离细菌的鉴定性能]
Rinsho Byori. 2013 May;61(5):382-9.
2
Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.细菌学领域正在进行的变革:通过基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱法对细菌进行常规鉴定。
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Aug 15;49(4):543-51. doi: 10.1086/600885.
3
Performance of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for identification of bacterial strains routinely isolated in a clinical microbiology laboratory.基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱技术在常规临床微生物实验室分离的细菌菌株鉴定中的性能。
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 May;48(5):1549-54. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01794-09. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
4
Performance of a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry system for the identification of bacterial isolates in the clinical routine laboratory.基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱系统在临床常规实验室中用于鉴定细菌分离株的性能
Clin Lab. 2009;55(7-8):289-96.
5
Species identification of clinical isolates of Bacteroides by matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.采用基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱法对拟杆菌临床分离株进行菌种鉴定。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009 Aug;15(8):796-802. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02788.x. Epub 2009 May 11.
6
Microorganisms direct identification from blood culture by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱法直接从血培养物中鉴定微生物。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Apr;17(4):546-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03257.x.
7
Species identification of Aspergillus, Fusarium and Mucorales with direct surface analysis by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.采用基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱法直接表面分析鉴定曲霉属、镰刀菌属和毛霉目。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 May;18(5):475-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03599.x. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
8
The use of Gram stain and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry on positive blood culture: synergy between new and old technology.革兰氏染色和基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱法在阳性血培养中的应用:新技术和旧技术的协同作用。
APMIS. 2011 Oct;119(10):681-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2011.02756.x. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
9
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry following short incubation on a solid medium is a valuable tool for rapid pathogen identification from positive blood cultures.在固体培养基上短暂培养后进行基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱分析,是从阳性血培养物中快速鉴定病原体的一项重要工具。
Int J Med Microbiol. 2015 Jun-Aug;305(4-5):469-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
10
Real-time comparative evaluation of bioMerieux VITEK MS versus Bruker Microflex MS, two matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry systems, for identification of clinically significant bacteria.对生物梅里埃VITEK MS和布鲁克Microflex MS这两种基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱系统进行实时比较评估,以鉴定具有临床意义的细菌。
BMC Microbiol. 2014 Nov 30;14:289. doi: 10.1186/s12866-014-0289-0.

引用本文的文献

1
The ongoing revolution of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for microbiology reaches tropical Africa.用于微生物学的基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)的持续变革已延伸至热带非洲地区。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Mar;92(3):641-7. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0406. Epub 2015 Jan 19.