Suppr超能文献

[两种基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)模型对血培养分离细菌的鉴定性能]

[Performance of two matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) models for identification of bacteria isolated from blood culture].

作者信息

Itoh Eisuke, Watari Tomohisa, Azuma Yuka, Watanabe Naoki, Tomoda Yutaka, Akasaka Kazumi, Kino Shuichi

机构信息

Department of Medical Laboratory and Blood Center, Asahikawa Medical University Hospital, Asahikawa 078-8510, Japan.

出版信息

Rinsho Byori. 2013 May;61(5):382-9.

Abstract

We compared the results of two bacterial identification methods: 1) a traditional method based on phenotypic identification of the causative organism using gram-staining, culture and biochemical markers and 2) matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). A total of 111 isolates, including 107 strains of common bacteria species and 4 strains of 3 yeast species, were tested by the traditional method and MALDI-TOF MS method(VITEK MS and Micro flex LT). Data obtained using MALDI-TOF MS were classified as Level 1 and Level 2 according to the confidence level of identification results from the VITEK MS ver. 1.0 database (VITEK MS) and MALDI Biotyper ver. 2.0 database (Microflex LT). The proportions of measured samples identified as Level 1 were 98.2% with the VITEK MS database and 87.4% with the MALDI Biotyper database. The concordance rates of the traditional method were 93.7% with the VITEK MS database and 82.0% with the MALDI Biotyper database. Identification results of five strains were mismatched between the traditional method and MALDI-TOF MS. Their ribosomal RNA sequences were identical to the results obtained from MALDI-TOF MS. We concluded that the performance of VITEK MS is superior to that of the traditional method and Microflex LT.

摘要

我们比较了两种细菌鉴定方法的结果

1)一种基于使用革兰氏染色、培养和生化标记对致病微生物进行表型鉴定的传统方法,以及2)基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)。共有111株分离株,包括107株常见细菌菌株和4株3种酵母菌株,通过传统方法和MALDI-TOF MS方法(VITEK MS和Micro flex LT)进行了检测。根据VITEK MS ver. 1.0数据库(VITEK MS)和MALDI Biotyper ver. 2.0数据库(Microflex LT)的鉴定结果置信水平,将使用MALDI-TOF MS获得的数据分类为1级和2级。使用VITEK MS数据库鉴定为1级的被测样本比例为98.2%,使用MALDI Biotyper数据库的比例为87.4%。传统方法与VITEK MS数据库的一致性率为93.7%,与MALDI Biotyper数据库的一致性率为82.0%。传统方法与MALDI-TOF MS之间有5株菌株的鉴定结果不匹配。它们的核糖体RNA序列与从MALDI-TOF MS获得的结果相同。我们得出结论,VITEK MS的性能优于传统方法和Microflex LT。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验