Suppr超能文献

电离辐射与遗传风险。十七、人类基因组中自然发生的 DNA 缺失的形成机制及其在连接诱导的 DNA 双链断裂与照射生殖细胞中的缺失之间的潜在相关性。

Ionizing radiation and genetic risks. XVII. Formation mechanisms underlying naturally occurring DNA deletions in the human genome and their potential relevance for bridging the gap between induced DNA double-strand breaks and deletions in irradiated germ cells.

机构信息

Radiation Biophysics Group, Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Instituet, Box 260, Stockholm SE 17176, Sweden.

Radiation Biophysics Group, Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Instituet, Box 260, Stockholm SE 17176, Sweden.

出版信息

Mutat Res. 2013 Oct-Dec;753(2):114-130. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

Abstract

While much is known about radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and their repair, the question of how deletions of different sizes arise as a result of the processing of DSBs by the cell's repair systems has not been fully answered. In order to bridge this gap between DSBs and deletions, we critically reviewed published data on mechanisms pertaining to: (a) repair of DNA DSBs (from basic studies in this area); (b) formation of naturally occurring structural variation (SV) - especially of deletions - in the human genome (from genomic studies) and (c) radiation-induced mutations and structural chromosomal aberrations in mammalian somatic cells (from radiation mutagenesis and radiation cytogenetic studies). The specific aim was to assess the relative importance of the postulated mechanisms in generating deletions in the human genome and examine whether empirical data on radiation-induced deletions in mouse germ cells are consistent with predictions of these mechanisms. The mechanisms include (a) NHEJ, a DSB repair process that does not require any homology and which functions in all stages of the cell cycle (and is of particular relevance in G0/G1); (b) MMEJ, also a DSB repair process but which requires microhomology and which presumably functions in all cell cycle stages; (c) NAHR, a recombination-based DSB repair mechanism which operates in prophase I of meiosis in germ cells; (d) MMBIR, a microhomology-mediated, replication-based mechanism which operates in the S phase of the cell cycle, and (e) strand slippage during replication (involved in the origin of small insertions and deletions (INDELs). Our analysis permits the inference that, between them, these five mechanisms can explain nearly all naturally occurring deletions of different sizes identified in the human genome, NAHR and MMBIR being potentially more versatile in this regard. With respect to radiation-induced deletions, the basic studies suggest that those arising as a result of the operation of NHEJ/MMEJ processes, as currently formulated, are expected to be relatively small. However, data on induced mutations in mouse spermatogonial stem cells (irradiation in G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle and DSB repair presumed to be via NHEJ predominantly) show that most are associated with deletions of different sizes, some in the megabase range. There is thus a 'discrepancy' between what the basic studies suggest and the empirical observations in mutagenesis studies. This discrepancy, however, is only an apparent but not a real one. It can be resolved by considering the issue of deletions in the broader context of and in conjunction with the organization of chromatin in chromosomes and nuclear architecture, the conceptual framework for which already exists in studies carried out during the past fifteen years or so. In this paper, we specifically hypothesize that repair of DSBs induced in chromatin loops may offer a basis to explain the induction of deletions of different sizes and suggest an approach to test the hypothesis. We emphasize that the bridging of the gap between induced DSB and resulting deletions of different sizes is critical for current efforts in computational modeling of genetic risks.

摘要

虽然人们对辐射诱导的 DNA 双链断裂(DSB)及其修复有了很多了解,但细胞修复系统处理 DSB 后如何产生不同大小的缺失这一问题尚未得到充分解答。为了弥合 DSB 和缺失之间的差距,我们批判性地回顾了已发表的关于以下机制的文献数据:(a)DSB 的修复(来自该领域的基础研究);(b)人类基因组中自然发生的结构变异(SV)的形成-尤其是缺失(来自基因组研究);以及(c)哺乳动物体细胞中辐射诱导的突变和结构染色体畸变(来自辐射诱变和辐射细胞遗传学研究)。具体目标是评估所提出的机制在人类基因组中产生缺失的相对重要性,并检查用小鼠生殖细胞中诱导的辐射缺失的经验数据是否符合这些机制的预测。这些机制包括:(a)NHEJ,一种不需要任何同源性的 DSB 修复过程,它在细胞周期的所有阶段都起作用(在 G0/G1 期尤为重要);(b)MMEJ,也是一种 DSB 修复过程,但需要微同源性,据推测它在所有细胞周期阶段都起作用;(c)NAHR,一种在生殖细胞减数分裂前期起作用的基于重组的 DSB 修复机制;(d)MMBIR,一种基于微同源性的复制机制,在细胞周期的 S 期起作用;以及(e)复制过程中的链滑动(涉及小插入和缺失(INDELs)的起源)。我们的分析允许推断,这五个机制可以解释人类基因组中几乎所有自然发生的不同大小的缺失,NAHR 和 MMBIR 在这方面可能更具多功能性。关于辐射诱导的缺失,基础研究表明,那些由于 NHEJ/MMEJ 过程的作用而产生的缺失,按照目前的表述,预计相对较小。然而,关于小鼠精原干细胞中诱导突变的数据(细胞周期的 G0/G1 期的辐射和据推测主要通过 NHEJ 进行的 DSB 修复)表明,大多数与不同大小的缺失有关,有些缺失达到了兆碱基的范围。因此,基础研究提出的观点与诱变研究中的经验观察之间存在“差异”。然而,这种差异只是表面上的,而不是真实的。通过考虑在染色体和核架构的染色质组织中更广泛的背景下以及与染色质组织的关系来解决缺失问题,可以解决这个差异,为此已经存在了大约十五年左右的研究中的概念框架。在本文中,我们特别假设诱导的染色质环中的 DSB 修复可以为解释不同大小的缺失的诱导提供基础,并提出了一种测试该假设的方法。我们强调,在不同大小的诱导 DSB 和导致的缺失之间架起桥梁,对于当前计算遗传风险模型的努力至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验