• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理不应期任务中对任务1的反向串扰效应的位点。

Locus of backward crosstalk effects on task 1 in a psychological refractory period task.

作者信息

Ko Yao-Ting, Miller Jeff

机构信息

National Central University, <location>Taiwan</location>

University of Otago, <location>New Zealand</location>

出版信息

Exp Psychol. 2014 Jan 1;61(1):30-7. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000224.

DOI:10.1027/1618-3169/a000224
PMID:23948390
Abstract

Our performance on a task decreases when the task is in a dual-task situation than when it is in isolation. An important experimental setting for dual-task situation is the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm, and the dual-task performance decrements in the PRP paradigm are referred to as PRP interference. The standard response-selection bottleneck (RSB) models state that the response-selection stage of the second task (T2) cannot start until the response-selection stage of the first task (T1) finishes, resulting in the PRP interference. Contrary to the prediction of RSB models, several researchers have found T2's modulations on T1's performance, and have suggested that T1's selection-related processes are affected by T2's selection-related processes, referred to as backward crosstalk effects. The locus of backward crosstalk effects is not clear, however, because RTs were measured in most previous studies. By using semantically unrelated stimuli and responses and by measuring T1's lateralized readiness potential, we examined the locus of backward crosstalk effects. We found that the interval between T1's stimulus onset and the stimulus-locked LRP onset was affected, suggesting T2's response selection starts before T1's selection is complete. The present result provided electrophysiological evidence focusing on T1's changes in favor of the hypothesis of parallel response selection in the PRP paradigm.

摘要

当任务处于双重任务情境中时,我们在该任务上的表现比单独执行任务时要差。双重任务情境的一个重要实验设置是心理不应期(PRP)范式,PRP范式中的双重任务表现下降被称为PRP干扰。标准的反应选择瓶颈(RSB)模型指出,第二个任务(T2)的反应选择阶段直到第一个任务(T1)的反应选择阶段完成后才能开始,从而导致PRP干扰。与RSB模型的预测相反,一些研究人员发现T2对T1的表现有调节作用,并提出T1的选择相关过程受到T2的选择相关过程的影响,这被称为反向串扰效应。然而,由于在大多数先前的研究中测量的是反应时,反向串扰效应的位置尚不清楚。通过使用语义无关的刺激和反应,并测量T1的侧化准备电位,我们研究了反向串扰效应的位置。我们发现T1的刺激开始与刺激锁定的LRP开始之间的间隔受到影响,这表明T2的反应选择在T1的选择完成之前就开始了。目前的结果提供了电生理证据,聚焦于T1的变化,支持了PRP范式中并行反应选择的假设。

相似文献

1
Locus of backward crosstalk effects on task 1 in a psychological refractory period task.心理不应期任务中对任务1的反向串扰效应的位点。
Exp Psychol. 2014 Jan 1;61(1):30-7. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000224.
2
Introspection about backward crosstalk in dual-task performance.对双重任务表现中反向串扰的内省。
Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):605-617. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01282-3. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
3
Identifying the locus of compatibility-based backward crosstalk: Evidence from an extended PRP paradigm.识别基于兼容性的反向串扰位点:来自扩展PRP范式的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Feb;44(2):261-276. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000445. Epub 2017 May 29.
4
Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm.心理不应期范式中的反向反应水平串扰。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Feb;32(1):149-65. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.149.
5
Electrophysiological examination of response-related interference while dual-tasking: is it motoric or attentional?双重任务时反应相关干扰的电生理学检查:是运动的还是注意的?
Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):660-678. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01261-8. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
6
Separating limits on preparation versus online processing in multitasking paradigms: Evidence for resource models.多任务范式中准备与在线处理的分离限制:资源模型的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Jan;43(1):89-102. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000277. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
7
Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies.心理不应期范式中的逆向串扰效应:第二项任务反应类型对第一项任务反应潜伏期的影响。
Psychol Res. 2006 Nov;70(6):484-93. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0011-9. Epub 2005 Oct 20.
8
The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?与执行相关的双重任务干扰源:运动瓶颈还是反应监测?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1413-26. doi: 10.1037/a0015874.
9
Relationships among visual awareness, reaction time, and lateralized readiness potential in a simple reaction time task under the backward masking paradigm.在逆向掩蔽范式下的简单反应时任务中,视觉意识、反应时和偏侧化准备电位之间的关系。
Percept Mot Skills. 2009 Aug;109(1):187-207. doi: 10.2466/PMS.109.1.187-207.
10
How Social and Refractory Is the Social Psychological Refractory Period?社会心理不应期的社会性和顽固性如何?
Exp Psychol. 2017 Jul;64(4):273-281. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000369.

引用本文的文献

1
The affective consequences of response inhibition determine no-go-based crosstalk effects in dual tasks.反应抑制的情感后果决定了双重任务中基于不行走的串扰效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Dec;77(12):2533-2550. doi: 10.1177/17470218241231681. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
2
S1-R2 and R1-R2 Backward Crosstalk Both Affect the Central Processing Stage.S1-R2和R1-R2反向串扰均影响中枢处理阶段。
J Cogn. 2020 Oct 6;3(1):37. doi: 10.5334/joc.121.
3
Disentangling stimulus and response compatibility as potential sources of backward crosstalk.
将刺激和反应兼容性作为反向串扰的潜在来源进行区分。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Oct;82(7):3415-3431. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02039-6.
4
Global-local processing and dispositional bias interact with emotion processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm.在心理不应期范式中,全局-局部加工与特质偏向和情绪加工相互作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2020 Feb;238(2):345-354. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05716-7. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
5
To prepare or not to prepare? When preparation of a response in Task 2 induces extra performance costs in Task 1.准备还是不准备?当任务 2 的反应准备导致任务 1 的额外表现成本时。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Apr;26(2):654-660. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01581-1.
6
Efficient multitasking: parallel versus serial processing of multiple tasks.高效多任务处理:多个任务的并行与串行处理
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 8;6:1366. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01366. eCollection 2015.
7
Effect of foreknowledge on neural activity of primary "go" responses relates to response stopping and switching.预知对初级“执行”反应神经活动的影响与反应停止和转换有关。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Feb 4;9:34. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00034. eCollection 2015.