Koob Valentin, Durst Moritz, Bratzke Daniel, Ulrich Rolf, Janczyk Markus
Department of Psychology, University of Bremen, Bremen, DE.
Department of Psychology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, DE.
J Cogn. 2020 Oct 6;3(1):37. doi: 10.5334/joc.121.
A frequent observation in dual-task experiments is that performance in Task 1 is influenced by conceptual or spatial overlap with features of Task 2. Such compatibility-based backward crosstalk effects (BCEs) can occur when overlap exists between the responses of two tasks-the R1-R2 BCE-or between the stimulus in Task 1 and the response in Task 2-the S1-R2 BCE. The present study investigated whether the S1-R2 BCE has a perceptual locus, and by implication, whether the two BCEs have a common processing locus or different ones. To this end, we applied the additive factors logic and manipulated the duration of the Task 1 perceptual stage. The results argue against a perceptual locus for both BCEs. As a possible explanation, we suggest that the R1-R2 BCE and the S1-R2 BCE have their locus within a capacity-limited central stage, but that they arise from different processes within this stage. The R1-R2 BCE influences Task 1 response selection, whereas the S1-R2 BCE influences Task 1 stimulus classification. A plausible though post-hoc model is presented within the Discussion.
在双任务实验中经常观察到的一种现象是,任务1的表现会受到与任务2的特征在概念或空间上的重叠的影响。当两个任务的反应之间存在重叠时——即R1-R2逆向串扰效应(BCEs)——或者任务1中的刺激与任务2中的反应之间存在重叠时——即S1-R2 BCE,就会出现这种基于兼容性的逆向串扰效应。本研究调查了S1-R2 BCE是否具有感知位点,进而探究这两种BCEs是否具有共同的加工位点或不同的加工位点。为此,我们应用了加法因素逻辑,并操纵了任务1感知阶段的持续时间。结果表明这两种BCEs都不存在感知位点。作为一种可能的解释,我们认为R1-R2 BCE和S1-R2 BCE的位点位于一个容量有限的中枢阶段,但它们源自该阶段内不同的过程。R1-R2 BCE影响任务1的反应选择,而S1-R2 BCE影响任务1的刺激分类。讨论部分提出了一个合理的事后模型。