Kim Yushin, Yang Hong-Ryeol, Lee Jae-Woo, Yoon Bum-Chul
Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health~Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2014;27(1):17-23. doi: 10.3233/BMR-130414.
The high-power pain threshold ultrasound (HPPTUS) technique has been introduced as a novel treatment method in patients with myofascial trigger points (MTrPs). The aim of the current study was to compare the therapeutic effects of HPPTUS with those of the conventional ultrasound technique in elderly patients with latent MTrPs on the upper trapezius muscles of at least 1 side.
Forty-one participants received 8 treatment sessions with conventional ultrasound (n=19) or with the HPPTUS technique (n=22) for 4 consecutive weeks. Outcome variables included visual analog scale (VAS) scores, pressure pain threshold (PPT), and range of motion (ROM). The data were analyzed using repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) measurements.
The VAS scores recorded 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after HPPTUS were significantly lower than the baseline scores in both groups. The ROM (after 3 and 4 weeks) and PPT (after 4 weeks) values also significantly increased from their baseline values in both groups. On comparing the techniques, there were no significant differences in the VAS (p=0.296), PPT (p=0.768), and ROM (p=0.822) values, although both techniques showed therapeutic effects for 4 weeks (p < 0.001).
The results indicate that the HPPTUS technique in same manner as treatment of active MTrPs is not superior to the conventional ultrasound technique in the treatment of the elderly patients with the latent MTrPs.
高功率疼痛阈值超声(HPPTUS)技术已作为一种新型治疗方法应用于肌筋膜触发点(MTrP)患者。本研究的目的是比较HPPTUS与传统超声技术对至少一侧上斜方肌存在潜在MTrP的老年患者的治疗效果。
41名参与者连续4周接受8次传统超声治疗(n = 19)或HPPTUS技术治疗(n = 22)。观察指标包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、压力疼痛阈值(PPT)和活动范围(ROM)。数据采用重复方差分析(ANOVA)测量进行分析。
两组患者在接受HPPTUS治疗后1、2、3和4周记录的VAS评分均显著低于基线评分。两组患者的ROM(3周和4周后)和PPT(4周后)值也均较基线值显著增加。比较两种技术时,VAS(p = 0.296)、PPT(p = 0.768)和ROM(p = 0.822)值无显著差异,尽管两种技术在4周内均显示出治疗效果(p < 0.001)。
结果表明,在治疗存在潜在MTrP的老年患者时,HPPTUS技术与治疗活跃MTrP的方式相同,并不优于传统超声技术。