Kim Minhee, Lee Minyoung, Kim Yushin, Oh Sejun, Lee Dongshin, Yoon BumChul
1 Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Korea University , Seoul, South Korea .
2 Functional and Applied Biomechanics Section, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, MD.
J Altern Complement Med. 2016 Mar;22(3):244-51. doi: 10.1089/acm.2015.0205. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
This study aimed to demonstrate the effect of self-exercise with a therapeutic inflatable ball (SEIB) in elderly patients with myofascial pain syndrome.
Single-blind, randomized, controlled noninferiority trial.
University campus.
Forty elderly patients with myofascial pain syndrome completed the study. They were randomly allocated to SEIB (n = 22; mean age, 70.23 ± 6.11 years) or ultrasound (US) therapy (n = 18; mean age, 67.99 ± 5.64 years).
SEIB and US therapy (twice weekly for 4 consecutive weeks).
Visual analog scale (VAS), pressure pain threshold (PPT), and cervical lateral flexion (CLF) were measured at baseline and at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks.
The noninferiority test indicated that SEIB was not inferior to US for VAS, PPT, and CLF. Between-group comparisons showed no significant differences in the VAS (F = 2.579; p = 0.117), the PPT (F = 0.245; p = 0.624), and the CLF (F = 2.072; p = 0.159). In within-group comparisons, both groups presented significant differences in VAS (SEIB after 1 week and US after 1 week), PPT (SEIB after 3 weeks and US after 4 weeks), and CLF (SEIB after 4 weeks and US after 4 weeks) compared with baseline values.
SEIB for 4 weeks has an effect similar to that of US for desensitizing myofascial pain and increasing joint flexibility. High accessibility and low cost would make SEIB a practical self-treatment method in elderly patients with myofascial pain syndrome.
本研究旨在证明使用治疗性充气球进行自我锻炼(SEIB)对老年肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者的效果。
单盲、随机、对照非劣效性试验。
大学校园。
40名老年肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者完成了本研究。他们被随机分配至SEIB组(n = 22;平均年龄,70.23 ± 6.11岁)或超声(US)治疗组(n = 18;平均年龄,67.99 ± 5.64岁)。
SEIB和US治疗(每周两次,连续4周)。
在基线以及第1、2、3和4周时测量视觉模拟量表(VAS)、压痛阈值(PPT)和颈椎侧屈(CLF)。
非劣效性检验表明,在VAS、PPT和CLF方面,SEIB不劣于US。组间比较显示,VAS(F = 2.579;p = 0.117)、PPT(F = 0.245;p = 0.624)和CLF(F = 2.072;p = 0.159)无显著差异。组内比较显示,与基线值相比,两组在VAS(SEIB组在第1周后,US组在第1周后)、PPT(SEIB组在第3周后,US组在第4周后)和CLF(SEIB组在第4周后,US组在第4周后)方面均有显著差异。
为期4周的SEIB在使肌筋膜疼痛脱敏和增加关节灵活性方面具有与US相似的效果。高可及性和低成本将使SEIB成为老年肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者一种实用的自我治疗方法。