Bach-y-Rita P
Department of Neurology, Huddinge Hospital, Sweden.
Neuropsychologia. 1990;28(6):547-54. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(90)90033-k.
One of the factors leading to the virtual neglect of the long-term potential for functional recovery following brain damage was the eclipse of plasticity concepts during the 100 years following Broca's 1861 publication on location of function. However, in the last 30 years evidence has been accumulating that demonstrates the plasticity of the brain and thus recovery potential is a subject of practical as well as theoretical interest. "Unmasking" of relatively inactive pathways, the taking over of functional representation by undamaged brain tissue, and neuronal group selection are among the mechanisms that are being explored. Human models of recovery of function include hemispherectomy patients that have regained bilateral function, facial paralysis patients who recover function (with appropriate rehabilitation) after VII-XII cranial nerve anastomosis, and patients with muscle transpositions to re-establish lost motor functions. The role of early and late rehabilitation, with attention to psychosocial and environmental factors, appears to be critical for recovery.
导致人们实际上忽视脑损伤后功能恢复长期潜力的因素之一,是在1861年布罗卡发表关于功能定位的论文后的100年里,可塑性概念被掩盖了。然而,在过去30年里,越来越多的证据表明大脑具有可塑性,因此恢复潜力既是一个具有实际意义也是具有理论意义的课题。相对不活跃通路的“揭露”、未受损脑组织对功能表征的接管以及神经元群选择,都是正在探索的机制。功能恢复的人体模型包括恢复了双侧功能的大脑半球切除术患者、在第七至第十二对脑神经吻合术后(通过适当康复)恢复功能的面瘫患者,以及通过肌肉转位重建丧失运动功能的患者。早期和晚期康复的作用,以及对心理社会和环境因素的关注,似乎对恢复至关重要。