• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“爱婴健康倡议”对澳大利亚医疗保健系统的影响:对证据的批判性叙述性综述

The impact of the Baby Friendly Health Initiative in the Australian health care system: a critical narrative review of the evidence.

作者信息

Atchan Marjorie, Davis Deborah, Foureur Maralyn

机构信息

Centre of Midwifery, Child & Family Health, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW.

出版信息

Breastfeed Rev. 2013 Jul;21(2):15-22.

PMID:23957177
Abstract

Studies have identified that the practices of maternity facilities and health professionals are crucial to women's experience of support and breastfeeding 'success'. The Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) was launched globally in 1991 to protect, promote and support breastfeeding. While a direct causal effect has not been established and critics suggest the rhetoric conflicts with women's lived experiences as new mothers, a positive association between the Initiative and breastfeeding prevalence is apparent. Internationally, impact studies have demonstrated that where the Initiative is well integrated, there is an increase in rates of breastfeeding initiation and, to a lesser extent, duration. In consideration of the known health risks associated with the use of artificial baby milks this would suggest that BFHI implementation and accreditation should be a desirable strategy for committed health facilities. However, a variation in both BFHI uptake and breastfeeding prevalence between nations has been reported. This narrative review critically discusses a variety of issues relevant to the uptake and support of breastfeeding and the BFHI, utilising Australia as a case study. Whilst it enjoys 'in principle' policy support, Australia also suffers from a lack of uniformity in uptake and perception of the benefits of BFHI at all levels of the health system. Australian and international studies have identified similar enablers and barriers to implementation.

摘要

研究表明,产科机构和医护人员的做法对于女性获得支持的体验以及母乳喂养的“成功”至关重要。1991年,“爱婴医院倡议”(BFHI)在全球范围内发起,旨在保护、促进和支持母乳喂养。虽然尚未确定其直接因果效应,且批评者认为该倡议的言辞与初为人母的女性的生活经历相冲突,但该倡议与母乳喂养普及率之间存在明显的正相关关系。在国际上,影响研究表明,在该倡议得到良好整合的地方,母乳喂养开始率会有所提高,在一定程度上,母乳喂养持续时间也会延长。鉴于使用人工婴儿奶粉存在已知的健康风险,这表明实施和获得“爱婴医院倡议”认证对于有此意愿的医疗机构来说应该是一项理想的策略。然而,据报道,各国在“爱婴医院倡议”的采纳情况和母乳喂养普及率方面存在差异。本叙述性综述以澳大利亚为例,批判性地讨论了与母乳喂养的采纳和支持以及“爱婴医院倡议”相关的各种问题。虽然澳大利亚在“原则上”享有政策支持,但在卫生系统各级对“爱婴医院倡议”的采纳情况和对其益处的认知方面也缺乏一致性。澳大利亚和国际研究已经确定了类似的实施促进因素和障碍。

相似文献

1
The impact of the Baby Friendly Health Initiative in the Australian health care system: a critical narrative review of the evidence.“爱婴健康倡议”对澳大利亚医疗保健系统的影响:对证据的批判性叙述性综述
Breastfeed Rev. 2013 Jul;21(2):15-22.
2
Applying a knowledge translation model to the uptake of the Baby Friendly Health Initiative in the Australian health care system.将知识转化模型应用于澳大利亚医疗保健系统中实施爱婴医院倡议。
Women Birth. 2014 Jun;27(2):79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 29.
3
An instrumental case study examining the introduction and dissemination of the Baby Friendly Health Initiative in Australia: Participants' perspectives.一项考察澳大利亚推行《爱婴医院健康倡议》的工具性案例研究:参与者的观点。
Women Birth. 2018 Jun;31(3):210-219. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.08.130. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
4
Do baby-friendly hospitals influence breastfeeding duration on a national level?爱婴医院在国家层面上会影响母乳喂养时长吗?
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):e702-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0537.
5
The New Zealand/aotearoa baby-friendly hospital initiative implementation journey: piki ake te tihi--"strive for excellence".新西兰/奥特亚罗瓦促进爱婴医院的实施历程:力争卓越。
J Hum Lact. 2013 May;29(2):140-6. doi: 10.1177/0890334413480849.
6
Establishing the Baby-Friendly Community Initiative in Italy: development, strategy, and implementation.在意大利建立爱婴社区倡议:发展、策略和实施。
J Hum Lact. 2012 Aug;28(3):297-303. doi: 10.1177/0890334412447994. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
7
The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative 20 years on: facts, progress, and the way forward.《爱婴医院倡议 20 年:事实、进展和未来方向》
J Hum Lact. 2012 Aug;28(3):272-5. doi: 10.1177/0890334412446690. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
8
Ten steps or climbing a mountain: a study of Australian health professionals' perceptions of implementing the baby friendly health initiative to protect, promote and support breastfeeding.十步或登山:一项关于澳大利亚卫生专业人员对实施婴儿友好健康倡议以保护、促进和支持母乳喂养的看法的研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug 31;11:208. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-208.
9
Social value of maintaining baby-friendly hospital initiative accreditation in Australia: case study.澳大利亚维持爱婴医院倡议认证的社会价值:案例研究
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jan 7;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01365-3.
10
Legislation, policies and guidelines related to breastfeeding and the Baby Friendly Health Initiative in Australia: a document analysis.澳大利亚与母乳喂养及爱婴医院倡议相关的立法、政策和指南:文献分析
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Feb;42(1):72-81. doi: 10.1071/AH16067.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholders' views of the Baby Friendly Initiative implementation and impact: a mixed methods study.利益相关者对“爱婴医院倡议”实施及其影响的看法:一项混合方法研究。
Int Breastfeed J. 2024 Jul 12;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13006-024-00639-8.
2
Improving breastfeeding support through the implementation of the Baby-Friendly Hospital and Community Initiatives: a scoping review.通过实施《爱婴医院和社区倡议》提高母乳喂养支持:范围综述。
Int Breastfeed J. 2023 Apr 15;18(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13006-023-00556-2.
3
The impact of Baby Friendly Initiative accreditation: An overview of systematic reviews.
《促进母乳喂养适宜技术( BFHI )认证的影响:系统评价综述》。
Matern Child Nutr. 2021 Oct;17(4):e13216. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13216. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
4
Social value of maintaining baby-friendly hospital initiative accreditation in Australia: case study.澳大利亚维持爱婴医院倡议认证的社会价值:案例研究
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jan 7;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01365-3.
5
Professional and non-professional sources of formula feeding advice for parents in the first six months.母乳喂养咨询的专业和非专业来源,针对的是前六个月的父母。
Matern Child Nutr. 2020 Jul;16(3):e12942. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12942. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
6
A comparison of exclusive breastfeeding in Belgian maternity facilities with and without Baby-friendly Hospital status.比较有和没有“爱婴医院”地位的比利时产科设施中的纯母乳喂养。
Matern Child Nutr. 2019 Oct;15(4):e12845. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12845. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
7
The Reasons for Early Weaning, Perceived Insufficient Breast Milk, and Maternal Dissatisfaction: Comparative Studies in Two Belgian Regions.早期断奶、母乳不足认知及母亲不满的原因:比利时两个地区的比较研究
Int Sch Res Notices. 2014 Nov 9;2014:678564. doi: 10.1155/2014/678564. eCollection 2014.
8
The Impact in the United States of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative on Early Infant Health and Breastfeeding Outcomes.爱婴医院倡议对美国早期婴儿健康和母乳喂养结果的影响。
Breastfeed Med. 2016 Jun;11(5):222-30. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2015.0135. Epub 2016 Apr 15.