Suppr超能文献

比较有和没有“爱婴医院”地位的比利时产科设施中的纯母乳喂养。

A comparison of exclusive breastfeeding in Belgian maternity facilities with and without Baby-friendly Hospital status.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Research Center of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Clinical Research, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Matern Child Nutr. 2019 Oct;15(4):e12845. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12845. Epub 2019 Jun 11.

Abstract

A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out in Wallonia (the southern region of Belgium) in which a 20-question breastfeeding (BF) module was included in an immunization survey. The purpose of this paper is to compare exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) prevalences and BF practices for mothers giving birth in Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) and non-BFHI maternity facilities. A total of 557 mothers responded to BF questions when their child was 18-24 months old; 26.7% of them delivered in a BFHI maternity facility. At discharge, a larger proportion of children were exclusively breastfed if they were born in a BFHI maternity facility (76.5% vs. 65.8%, p = .02). The median duration of EBF (15.0 vs. 12.9 weeks, p = .3), and the proportion of children exclusively breastfed at 5 months (16.8% vs 15.8%, p = 1.0) were similar in both groups. Few mothers knew that EBF was recommended for the first 6 months of life (28.6% in BFHI vs 23.1% in non-BFHI, p = .2). For most groups of the population examined, the rates of BF tended to be higher in BFHI facilities, but many differences were not significant. More specifically, BFHI seemed to boost BF practices among mothers more likely to breastfeed, but the Initiative did not seem to trigger enhanced BF practices in mothers traditionally less likely to breastfeed (except for indifferent/negative partner's attitude and mothers of Belgian origin). Influencing the BF practices of mothers less likely to breastfeed requires a special attention with complementary actions in maternity facilities as well as in community services.

摘要

一项在瓦隆大区(比利时南部地区)进行的回顾性横断面研究,在免疫调查中纳入了一个 20 个问题的母乳喂养(BF)模块。本文旨在比较在婴儿友好医院倡议(BFHI)和非 BFHI 产科设施中分娩的母亲的纯母乳喂养(EBF)率和 BF 实践。当孩子 18-24 个月大时,共有 557 名母亲回答了 BF 问题;其中 26.7%的母亲在 BFHI 产科设施中分娩。出院时,如果孩子在 BFHI 产科设施中出生,那么纯母乳喂养的比例更大(76.5%比 65.8%,p=0.02)。EBF 的中位数持续时间(15.0 比 12.9 周,p=0.3)以及 5 个月时纯母乳喂养的儿童比例(16.8%比 15.8%,p=1.0)在两组中相似。很少有母亲知道推荐在生命的前 6 个月内进行 EBF(BFHI 中为 28.6%,非 BFHI 中为 23.1%,p=0.2)。对于大多数研究的人群群体,BFHI 设施中的 BF 率往往更高,但许多差异并不显著。更具体地说,BFHI 似乎促进了更有可能母乳喂养的母亲的 BF 实践,但该倡议似乎并没有促使传统上不太可能母乳喂养的母亲(除了冷漠/消极的伴侣态度和比利时裔母亲)增强 BF 实践。影响不太可能母乳喂养的母亲的 BF 实践需要特别关注,在产科设施以及社区服务中采取补充措施。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验