Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):86-93. doi: 10.1037/a0034250. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
This investigation aimed to establish retrospective time judgments as markers of internal context change across 2 memory paradigms, the effects of which have been attributed to internal context change by some researchers. Experiment 1 involved the list-method directed forgetting paradigm and established that the forget group significantly overestimated the duration of the experiment compared with the remember group. Experiment 2 involved the list-before-last paradigm, whereby participants studied 3 lists, and in between encoding of List 2 and List 3, some participants retrieved List 1, whereas the control participants restudied List 1. The results showed that the retrieval group significantly overestimated the duration of the experiment compared with the restudy group. Overall, these results support the context-change interpretation of these paradigms, and they also support the contextual-change hypothesis of retrospective timing (Block & Reed, 1978).
本研究旨在通过两个记忆范式(列表法定向遗忘范式和倒数第二列表范式)来建立回溯时间判断,这些范式的效果被一些研究人员归因于内部情境变化。实验 1 涉及列表法定向遗忘范式,结果表明遗忘组与记忆组相比,显著高估了实验的持续时间。实验 2 涉及倒数第二列表范式,参与者学习了 3 个列表,在对第 2 列表和第 3 列表进行编码之间,一些参与者检索了第 1 列表,而对照组参与者重新学习了第 1 列表。结果表明,与重新学习组相比,检索组显著高估了实验的持续时间。总的来说,这些结果支持这些范式的情境变化解释,也支持回溯时间的情境变化假说(Block & Reed, 1978)。