Riva M A, Manzoni M, Isimbaldi G, Cesana G, Pagni F
Section of History of Medicine, Research Centre on Public Health.
Biotech Histochem. 2014 Feb;89(2):81-90. doi: 10.3109/10520295.2013.822559. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
We describe the history of the histochemical stains that contributed most to the development of modern pathology during the last two centuries. Histochemical stains are presented in a list, which provides the essential information about year, country and main use of each to enable the reader to follow the chronological and geographical history of histochemistry. In addition to the historical evaluation of histochemistry development, we investigate how many classical histochemical stains survive in a modern laboratory of pathology and how often they are used for diagnostic practice compared to immunohistochemical (IHC) techniques. A ratio of about one histochemical reaction to 13 IHC reactions was tabulated. Finally, our data make it possible to define different cultural approaches to the terminology of histochemical and IHC stains: the former were based on eponyms, which link the stain with the name of its inventor, while the latter use a more impersonal biological terminology.
我们描述了在过去两个世纪中对现代病理学发展贡献最大的组织化学染色的历史。组织化学染色以列表形式呈现,其中提供了每种染色的年份、国家和主要用途的基本信息,以便读者了解组织化学的编年和地理历史。除了对组织化学发展进行历史评估外,我们还研究了在现代病理学实验室中有多少经典组织化学染色仍在使用,以及与免疫组织化学(IHC)技术相比,它们在诊断实践中的使用频率如何。列出了大约1种组织化学反应与13种免疫组织化学反应的比例。最后,我们的数据使得定义组织化学和免疫组织化学染色术语的不同文化方法成为可能:前者基于人名,将染色与其发明者的名字联系起来,而后者使用更客观的生物学术语。