• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

压载水管理豁免风险评估——波罗的海案例研究。

Risk assessment for exemptions from ballast water management--the Baltic Sea case study.

机构信息

David Consult, Korte 13e, SI-6310 Izola, Slovenia.

GoConsult, Grosse Brunnenstr. 61, DE-22763 Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Mar Pollut Bull. 2013 Oct 15;75(1-2):205-217. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.07.031. Epub 2013 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.07.031
PMID:23958222
Abstract

The International Convention for the Control and Management of Ship's Ballast Water and Sediments sets requirements to prevent organism transfers. Vessels on certain routes can be exempted from such requirements based on risk assessment (RA). As the convention nears its entry into force, the interest in exemptions increases. Such RA should be conducted according to the International Maritime Organization G7 Guidelines. We present a RA study for exemptions applied to intra-Baltic shipping considering different RA methods, i.e., environmental matching, species specific method including target species and species biogeographical aspects. As reliable species data in the ports considered are unavailable and following the precautionary principle, no exemptions should be granted. To ensure data reliability, port baseline surveys and regular monitoring programs should be undertaken during the exemption period as new species found influence the RA result. The RA model prepared is considered as of value to other areas worldwide.

摘要

《国际船舶压载水和沉积物控制和管理公约》规定了防止生物转移的要求。根据风险评估 (RA),某些航线的船舶可以免除这些要求。随着该公约即将生效,对豁免的兴趣日益增加。此类 RA 应按照国际海事组织 G7 准则进行。我们提出了一项针对波罗的海内部航运的豁免 RA 研究,考虑了不同的 RA 方法,即环境匹配、包括目标物种和物种生物地理方面的特定物种方法。由于所考虑的港口缺乏可靠的物种数据,并遵循预防原则,因此不应授予任何豁免。为了确保数据的可靠性,在豁免期间应进行港口基线调查和定期监测计划,因为发现的新物种会影响 RA 结果。所准备的 RA 模型被认为对世界其他地区具有价值。

相似文献

1
Risk assessment for exemptions from ballast water management--the Baltic Sea case study.压载水管理豁免风险评估——波罗的海案例研究。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2013 Oct 15;75(1-2):205-217. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.07.031. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
2
Exceptions and exemptions under the ballast water management convention - Sustainable alternatives for ballast water management?压载水管理公约的例外和豁免 - 压载水管理的可持续替代品?
J Environ Manage. 2021 Sep 1;293:112823. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112823. Epub 2021 May 25.
3
Assessing exemptions under the ballast water management convention: preclude the Trojan horse.评估《压载水管理公约》规定的豁免情况:谨防特洛伊木马。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2016 Feb 15;103(1-2):84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.12.043. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
4
Vulnerability to bioinvasions: Current status, risk assessment and management of ballast water through a regional approach - the Adriatic Sea.生物入侵的脆弱性:通过区域方法评估压载水的现状、风险和管理 - 亚得里亚海。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2019 Oct;147:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.06.057. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
5
Global ballast water management and the "same location" concept: a clear term or a clear issue?全球压载水管理与“同一地点”概念:表述清晰还是问题凸显?
Ecol Appl. 2013 Mar;23(2):331-8. doi: 10.1890/12-0992.1.
6
A unique aspect of ballast water management requirements--the same location concept.压载水管理要求的一个独特方面——同一地点概念。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2012 Sep;64(9):1774-5. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
7
Geographic variation in marine invasions among large estuaries: effects of ships and time.大型河口海洋入侵的地理差异:船舶和时间的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2013 Mar;23(2):311-20. doi: 10.1890/11-1660.1.
8
Estimation of the introduction risk of non-indigenous species through ship ballast water in the Port of Douala (Cameroon).通过船舶压载水在杜阿拉港(喀麦隆)估算外来物种的引入风险。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2024 Jan;198:115794. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115794. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
9
Risk assessment for ballast water management - Learning from the Adriatic Sea case study.压载水管理风险评估——从亚得里亚海案例研究中学习。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2019 Oct;147:36-46. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
10
Evaluation of the ecotoxicity and biological efficacy of ship's ballast water treatment based on hydroxyl radicals technique.基于羟基自由基技术的船舶压载水处理的生态毒性和生物功效评估。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2012 Dec;64(12):2742-8. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.09.016. Epub 2012 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
A temporal assessment of risk of non-indigenous species introduction by ballast water to Canadian coastal waters based on environmental similarity.基于环境相似性对压载水引入非本地物种至加拿大沿海水域的风险进行的时间评估。
Biol Invasions. 2023;25(6):1991-2005. doi: 10.1007/s10530-023-03019-1. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
2
Contrasting seasonal and spatial distribution of native and invasive seaweed revealed by targeting species-specific eDNA.通过靶向物种特异性环境DNA揭示本地和入侵海藻的季节性和空间分布差异。
Ecol Evol. 2019 Jul 10;9(15):8567-8579. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5379. eCollection 2019 Aug.
3
A comparison of impact and risk assessment methods based on the IMO Guidelines and EU invasive alien species risk assessment frameworks.
基于国际海事组织指南和欧盟外来入侵物种风险评估框架的影响与风险评估方法比较
PeerJ. 2019 Jun 10;7:e6965. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6965. eCollection 2019.
4
Identifying the physical features of marina infrastructure associated with the presence of non-native species in the UK.识别英国与非本地物种存在相关的滨海基础设施的物理特征。
Mar Biol. 2016;163:173. doi: 10.1007/s00227-016-2941-8. Epub 2016 Jul 25.