• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量认知障碍老年人急性护理中的以患者为中心程度:POPAC 量表的评估。

Measuring levels of person-centeredness in acute care of older people with cognitive impairment: evaluation of the POPAC scale.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug 19;13:327. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-327.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-13-327
PMID:23958295
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3751919/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Person-centeredness is increasingly advocated in the literature as a gold-standard, best practice concept in health services for older people. This concept describes care that incorporates individual and multidimensional needs, personal biography, subjectivity and interpersonal relationships. However, acute in-patient hospital services have a long-standing biomedical tradition that may contrast with person-centred care. Since few tools exist that enable measurements of the extent to which acute in-patient hospital services are perceived as being person-centred, this study aimed to translate the English version of the Person-centred care of older people with cognitive impairment in acute care scale (POPAC) to Swedish, and evaluate its psychometric properties in a sample of acute hospital staff.

METHODS

The 15-item POPAC was translated, back-translated and culturally adjusted, and distributed to a cross-sectional sample of Swedish acute care staff (n = 293). Item performance was evaluated through assessment of item means, internal consistency by Cronbach's alpha on total and on subscale levels; temporal stability was assessed through Pearson's product correlation and intra-class correlation between test and retest scores. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to explore model fit.

RESULTS

The results indicate that the Swedish version POPAC provides a tentatively construct-valid and reliable contribution to measuring the extent to which acute in-patient hospital services have processes and procedures that can facilitate person-centred care of older patients with cognitive impairment. However, some questions remain regarding the dimensionality of POPAC.

CONCLUSIONS

POPAC provides a valuable contribution to the quest of improving acute care for older patients with cognitive impairment by enabling measures and subsequent accumulation of internationally comparable data for research and practice development purposes. POPAC can be used to highlight strengths and areas for improvements in care practice for older patients, and to illuminate aspects that risk being overlooked in busy acute hospital settings.

摘要

背景

以患者为中心的理念在文献中越来越受到推崇,被视为老年人健康服务的黄金标准和最佳实践理念。这一理念描述了包含个体和多维需求、个人传记、主观性和人际关系的护理。然而,急性住院医院服务具有长期的生物医学传统,这可能与以患者为中心的护理形成对比。由于几乎没有工具可以衡量急性住院医院服务被认为是以人为中心的程度,因此本研究旨在将英文版的《认知障碍老年人急性护理中的以患者为中心护理量表》(POPAC)翻译成瑞典语,并在急性医院工作人员样本中评估其心理测量学特性。

方法

对 15 项 POPAC 进行翻译、回译和文化调整,并分发给瑞典急性护理工作人员的横断面样本(n=293)。通过评估项目均值、总得分和子量表水平的克朗巴赫 α 内部一致性来评估项目表现;通过测试和重测得分之间的皮尔逊积差相关和组内相关评估时间稳定性。采用验证性因子分析探索模型拟合度。

结果

结果表明,瑞典版 POPAC 为测量急性住院医院服务在多大程度上具有促进认知障碍老年患者以患者为中心护理的流程和程序提供了一个初步的结构有效性和可靠性贡献。然而,POPAC 的维度仍存在一些问题。

结论

POPAC 通过为研究和实践发展目的提供可衡量和可积累的国际可比数据,为改善认知障碍老年患者的急性护理做出了有价值的贡献。POPAC 可用于突出老年患者护理实践的优势和改进领域,并阐明在繁忙的急性医院环境中可能被忽视的方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24cc/3751919/ca0f1616e435/1472-6963-13-327-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24cc/3751919/ca0f1616e435/1472-6963-13-327-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24cc/3751919/ca0f1616e435/1472-6963-13-327-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring levels of person-centeredness in acute care of older people with cognitive impairment: evaluation of the POPAC scale.测量认知障碍老年人急性护理中的以患者为中心程度:POPAC 量表的评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug 19;13:327. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-327.
2
Validation and psychometric evaluation of the Dutch person-centred care of older people with cognitive impairment in acute care (POPAC) scale.荷兰急性护理中认知障碍老年人以患者为中心护理(POPAC)量表的验证与心理测量学评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 13;21(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06048-x.
3
The person-centred care of older people with cognitive impairment in acute care (POPAC) scale - psychometric evaluation.急性护理中认知障碍老年人的以患者为中心护理(POPAC)量表——心理测量学评估
J Nurs Manag. 2017 Mar;25(2):139-147. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12451. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
4
The person-centred care of older people with cognitive impairment in acute care scale (POPAC).老年人认知障碍的以患者为中心的急性护理量表 (POPAC)。
J Nurs Manag. 2013 Jan;21(1):79-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01422.x. Epub 2012 May 4.
5
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-centred Climate Questionnaire - Staff version (PCQ-S).以患者为中心的气候问卷中文版——员工版(PCQ-S)的心理测量学评估。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 28;7(8):e017250. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017250.
6
Structural validation of two person-centred practice inventories PCPI-S and PCPI-C - French version.两个人本主义实践量表(PCPI-S 和 PCPI-C)的结构验证——法语版。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 18;24(1):1092. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11432-y.
7
Construction and psychometric evaluation of the Swedish language Person-centred Climate Questionnaire - staff version.构建和心理测量评价瑞典语版以患者为中心的护理环境问卷-员工版。
J Nurs Manag. 2009 Nov;17(7):790-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.01005.x.
8
Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the Person-Centered Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT).中文版的 Person-Centered Care Assessment Tool(P-CAT)的心理计量学评估。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Mar;24(3):406-15. doi: 10.1017/S104161021100202X. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
9
Item distribution, internal consistency and structural validity of the German language person-centred climate questionnaire - staff version (PCQ-G-S): a cross-sectional study.德语文人本主义气候问卷-员工版(PCQ-G-S)的项目分布、内部一致性和结构有效性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 12;24(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04528-3.
10
Validating the Hebrew version of the Person-Centered Care of Older People with Cognitive Impairment in Acute Care scale.验证《急性照护中认知障碍老年人以人为主的照护量表》的希伯来文版本。
J Nurs Manag. 2021 Apr;29(3):584-590. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13177. Epub 2020 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
'A lot of people think it's just a Mickey Mouse role': Role ambiguity among dementia support workers within secondary care and community hospital settings.“很多人认为这只是一个微不足道的角色”:二级保健和社区医院环境中痴呆症支持工作者的角色模糊性。
Dementia (London). 2024 Feb;23(2):191-209. doi: 10.1177/14713012231220461. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
2
Experiences of informal caregivers of people with dementia with nursing care in acute hospitals: A descriptive mixed-methods study.痴呆患者非专业照护者在急性医院接受护理的体验:一项描述性混合方法研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Dec;77(12):4887-4899. doi: 10.1111/jan.15042. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Person-Centred dementia care. Making services better Dawn Brooker Person-Centred Dementia Care. Making Services Better Jessica Kingsley 160 £14.99 1 84310 337 0 1843103370 [Formula: see text].以个人为中心的痴呆症护理。改善服务 道恩·布鲁克 以个人为中心的痴呆症护理。改善服务 杰西卡·金斯利 160页 14.99英镑 1 84310 337 0 1843103370 [公式:见正文]
Nurs Older People. 2007 Jun 1;19(5):22-23. doi: 10.7748/nop.19.5.22.s21.
2
Falling behind: a substantive theory of care for older people with cognitive impairment in acute settings.落后:急性环境中认知障碍老年人护理的实质性理论。
J Clin Nurs. 2013 Jun;22(11-12):1682-91. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12177. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
3
Validation and psychometric evaluation of the Dutch person-centred care of older people with cognitive impairment in acute care (POPAC) scale.
荷兰急性护理中认知障碍老年人以患者为中心护理(POPAC)量表的验证与心理测量学评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 13;21(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06048-x.
4
Bed Moves, Ward Environment, Staff Perspectives and Falls for Older People with High Falls Risk in an Acute Hospital: A Mixed Methods Study.卧床移动、病房环境、医护人员观点与高跌倒风险的老年患者在急性医院的跌倒:一项混合方法研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Dec 18;14:2223-2237. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S211424. eCollection 2019.
The person-centred care of older people with cognitive impairment in acute care scale (POPAC).
老年人认知障碍的以患者为中心的急性护理量表 (POPAC)。
J Nurs Manag. 2013 Jan;21(1):79-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01422.x. Epub 2012 May 4.
4
Everyday practices at the medical ward: a 16-month ethnographic field study.医疗病房的日常实践:一项为期 16 个月的民族志实地研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jul 2;12:184. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-184.
5
Evidence-based risk factors for adverse health outcomes in older patients after discharge home and assessment tools: a systematic review.老年患者出院回家后不良健康结局的循证风险因素及评估工具:一项系统综述
J Evid Based Soc Work. 2011 Oct 26;8(5):445-68. doi: 10.1080/15433714.2011.542330.
6
Effects of person-centred care in patients with chronic heart failure: the PCC-HF study.以患者为中心的护理对慢性心力衰竭患者的影响:PCC-HF 研究。
Eur Heart J. 2012 May;33(9):1112-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr306. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
7
Examining and establishing translational and conceptual equivalence of survey questionnaires for a multi-ethnic, multi-language study.检查并建立多民族、多语言研究的调查问卷的翻译和概念等效性。
J Adv Nurs. 2011 Oct;67(10):2267-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05679.x. Epub 2011 Apr 29.
8
Prevalence of the notification of malnutrition in the departments of internal medicine and its prognostic implications.内科病房营养不良通报的流行情况及其预后意义。
Clin Nutr. 2011 Aug;30(4):450-4. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.12.005. Epub 2011 Feb 5.
9
Acute care management of older people with dementia: a qualitative perspective.老年痴呆症患者的急性护理管理:定性视角。
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Feb;20(3-4):420-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03521.x. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
10
Measuring Person-centered Care: A Critical Comparative Review of Published Tools.衡量以患者为中心的护理:已发表工具的批判性比较评价。
Gerontologist. 2010 Dec;50(6):834-46. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnq047. Epub 2010 Jun 21.