1 Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 2 Department of Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. 3 Address correspondence to: Dr. Frank R. de Gruijl, Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Postal Zone S2P, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Transplantation. 2013 Nov 27;96(10):871-6. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182a3dfa3.
Organ transplant recipients using the immunosuppressant cyclosporine have an increased risk for developing nonmelanoma skin cancer. Disparate effects of cyclosporine have, however, been reported on UV-induced skin carcinogenesis in mouse experiments. Therefore, we set out to compare three experimental protocols using mice, with the aim to emulate most closely the increased skin cancer risk in organ transplant recipients.
UV carcinogenesis was performed in hairless SKH-1 mice by three protocols: dietary cyclosporine and daily UV exposures, dietary cyclosporine after a period of UV exposures, and bolus dosing cyclosporine by gavage and repeated UV exposures.
Using chronic UV exposure, continuous dietary administration of cyclosporine was shown to inhibit tumor formation. Dietary cyclosporine after a period of UV exposures did not affect ensuing UV carcinogenesis. However, in contrast with dietary cyclosporine, bolus dosages of cyclosporine by gavage, resulting in strongly varying blood levels of cyclosporine, increased tumor development in chronically UV-exposed mice. There was no difference in tumor development between mice UV-irradiated during peak or trough levels of cyclosporine in the blood. Time-averaged levels in these mice were similar to those with cyclosporine in the diet.
Cyclosporine in bolus doses appears to increase skin cancer development, whereas cyclosporine administration more evenly spread over time does not. Extrapolation to transplant patients suggests that the mode of administrating cyclosporine may be crucial for the increased skin cancer risk and that this risk might be lowered with a more steady release of cyclosporine in the body.
使用免疫抑制剂环孢素的器官移植受者发生非黑素瘤皮肤癌的风险增加。然而,在小鼠实验中,环孢素对 UV 诱导的皮肤致癌作用的影响却存在差异。因此,我们着手比较了三种使用小鼠的实验方案,旨在最接近地模拟器官移植受者中增加的皮肤癌风险。
通过三种方案在无毛 SKH-1 小鼠中进行 UV 致癌作用:饮食环孢素和每日 UV 暴露、UV 暴露后一段时间的饮食环孢素以及灌胃给予环孢素冲击剂量和重复 UV 暴露。
使用慢性 UV 暴露,连续饮食给予环孢素可抑制肿瘤形成。UV 暴露后一段时间的饮食环孢素并不影响随后的 UV 致癌作用。然而,与饮食环孢素不同,灌胃给予环孢素冲击剂量,导致环孢素的血液水平发生剧烈变化,增加了慢性 UV 暴露小鼠的肿瘤发展。在血液中环孢素处于峰值或谷值水平时对小鼠进行 UV 照射,肿瘤发展没有差异。这些小鼠的时间平均水平与饮食中环孢素相似。
环孢素冲击剂量似乎会增加皮肤癌的发展,而时间均匀分布的环孢素给药则不会。向移植患者外推表明,环孢素的给药方式可能对增加的皮肤癌风险至关重要,并且通过在体内更稳定地释放环孢素,可能降低这种风险。