• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估2.4公里跑作为有氧能力预测指标的情况。

Assessment of the 2.4 km run as a predictor of aerobic capacity.

作者信息

Burger S C, Bertram S R, Stewart R I

机构信息

Department of Medical Physiology and Biochemistry, University of Stellenbosch, Parowvallei, CP.

出版信息

S Afr Med J. 1990 Sep 15;78(6):327-9.

PMID:2396155
Abstract

Since the 2.4 km run time test is routinely used in military training programmes as an indicator of aerobic capacity and its possible improvement, an attempt was made to: (i) establish a regression equation of VO2max v. 2.4 km run time in a group of 20 young military volunteers; and (ii) determine whether this equation could be used to predict VO2max reliably from the 2.4 km time obtained from another group. Before and after training, VO2max was measured in all subjects using a treadmill test, and 2.4 km run time was determined in the field. Linear regression equations using the 2.4 km run time as the independent variable accounted for 76-92% of the variance in VO2max, while the standard error of the estimate varied from 2.24-2.91 ml/kg/min. In the second test group, the directly measured VO2max was 59.89 +/- 0.99 ml/kg/min, while the mean value estimated from the regression equation of the first group was 59.61 +/- 1.16 ml/kg/min (P less than 0.001). It was concluded that, in the population studied, the 2.4 km run time in the field reliably predicts VO2max measured during treadmill exercise in the laboratory.

摘要

由于2.4公里跑步时间测试在军事训练项目中经常被用作有氧能力及其可能改善情况的指标,因此进行了以下尝试:(i)在一组20名年轻军事志愿者中建立最大摄氧量(VO2max)与2.4公里跑步时间之间的回归方程;(ii)确定该方程是否可用于根据另一组获得的2.4公里时间可靠地预测VO2max。在训练前后,使用跑步机测试测量所有受试者的VO2max,并在野外测定2.4公里跑步时间。以2.4公里跑步时间作为自变量的线性回归方程解释了VO2max变异的76%-92%,而估计标准误差在2.24-2.91毫升/千克/分钟之间。在第二个测试组中,直接测量的VO2max为59.89±0.99毫升/千克/分钟,而根据第一组回归方程估计的平均值为59.61±1.16毫升/千克/分钟(P<0.001)。得出的结论是,在所研究的人群中,野外2.4公里跑步时间能够可靠地预测实验室跑步机运动期间测量的VO2max。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the 2.4 km run as a predictor of aerobic capacity.评估2.4公里跑作为有氧能力预测指标的情况。
S Afr Med J. 1990 Sep 15;78(6):327-9.
2
Validity of the 20 m shuttle run test with 1 min stages to predict VO2max in adults.采用1分钟阶段的20米穿梭跑测试预测成年人最大摄氧量的效度。
Can J Sport Sci. 1989 Mar;14(1):21-6.
3
Evaluation of the American College of Sports Medicine submaximal treadmill running test for predicting VO2max.评价美国运动医学学院次最大跑步机跑步测试预测最大摄氧量的能力。
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Feb;26(2):548-54. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bac56e.
4
Validation of several methods of estimating maximal oxygen uptake in young men.几种估算年轻男性最大摄氧量方法的验证
Percept Mot Skills. 1998 Oct;87(2):575-84. doi: 10.2466/pms.1998.87.2.575.
5
Validity and reliability analysis of Cooper's 12-minute run and the multistage shuttle run in healthy adults.健康成年人库珀 12 分钟跑和多级穿梭跑的有效性和可靠性分析。
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Mar;25(3):597-605. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc2423.
6
Effects of stair-climbing vs run training on treadmill and track running performance.爬楼梯训练与跑步训练对跑步机和跑道跑步表现的影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993 Nov;25(11):1275-8.
7
VO2max estimation from a submaximal 1-mile track jog for fit college-age individuals.通过对健康的大学生进行次最大强度的1英里跑道慢跑估计最大摄氧量。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993 Mar;25(3):401-6.
8
Comparative analysis of the 1-mile run test evaluation formulae: assessment of aerobic capacity in male law enforcement officers aged 20-23 years.1英里跑测试评估公式的比较分析:对20 - 23岁男性执法人员有氧能力的评估
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2014 Apr;27(2):165-74. doi: 10.2478/s13382-014-0237-0. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
9
Metabolic determinants of 1-mile run/walk performance in children.儿童1英里跑/走表现的代谢决定因素
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991 May;23(5):611-7.
10
Validation of the 12-min swim as a field test of peak aerobic power in young men.验证12分钟游泳作为年轻男性峰值有氧能力的现场测试方法。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991 Jun;23(6):766-73.

引用本文的文献

1
Longitudinal change in cardiorespiratory fitness and the association with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in young Asian men: a cohort study.亚洲年轻男性心肺适能的纵向变化及其与心血管疾病和全因死亡率的关联:一项队列研究
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2024 Aug 7;10(3):e001986. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2024-001986. eCollection 2024.
2
Prediction of Maximum Lactate Concentration During an All-Out Anaerobic Test in Elite Ice Hockey Players.精英冰球运动员全力无氧测试中最大乳酸浓度的预测
Int J Exerc Sci. 2023 Nov 1;16(4):1385-1397. doi: 10.70252/WFUM1223. eCollection 2023.
3
Sex differences in iron status during military training: a prospective cohort study of longitudinal changes and associations with endurance performance and musculoskeletal outcomes.
军事训练期间铁状态的性别差异:一项关于纵向变化以及与耐力表现和肌肉骨骼结果相关性的前瞻性队列研究。
Br J Nutr. 2024 Feb 28;131(4):581-592. doi: 10.1017/S0007114523001812. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
4
Cardiorespiratory fitness, body mass index, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in young men: A cohort study.心肺适能、体重指数、心血管疾病与年轻男性的死亡率:一项队列研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 15;11:1076065. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1076065. eCollection 2023.
5
Effects of physical fitness training on metabolic syndrome among military personnel in Taiwan.体能训练对台湾军人代谢综合征的影响。
BMJ Mil Health. 2023 May;169(e1):e15-e19. doi: 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2020-001761. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
6
Criterion-Related Validity of the Distance- and Time-Based Walk/Run Field Tests for Estimating Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于距离和时间的步行/跑步现场测试评估心肺适能的效标关联效度:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 17;11(3):e0151671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151671. eCollection 2016.
7
Effects of diet, physical activity and performance, and body weight on incident gout in ostensibly healthy, vigorously active men.饮食、身体活动与表现以及体重对表面健康、积极活跃的男性痛风发病的影响。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 May;87(5):1480-7. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.5.1480.
8
Relation of speed of a mile run, maximum energy cost of running, and maximum oxygen consumption: a field study.一英里跑速度、跑步最大能量消耗与最大耗氧量之间的关系:一项实地研究。
Br J Sports Med. 1995 Dec;29(4):271-2. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.29.4.271.