Suppr超能文献

重点:科学、历史与现代印度。引言。

Focus: science, history, and modern India. Introduction.

作者信息

Phalkey Jahnavi

机构信息

King's India Institute, King's College, London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Isis. 2013 Jun;104(2):330-6. doi: 10.1086/670950.

Abstract

Histories of science in India are revisitations of the colonial question. Science is ideology to be unraveled and exposed--as modernity and progress making or violence and oppression making--depending on where you stand on the interpretive spectrum. It has been seen as ideologically driven practice, as a mode of knowledge production whose history is inseparable from the social and political uses to which it is tethered. In the colonial as well as the postcolonial context, science and technology have been seen as the "ideology of empire," "tools of empire," "tentacles of progress," and "reasons of state." Yet science and technology are practices and bodies of knowledge that inhabitants of the subcontinent have engaged with enthusiasm, that they have used to invent themselves in their global, national, and individual lives. We know remarkably little about the histories of these complex engagements. A departure from current historiographical preoccupations is called for to map and explain the lives, institutions, practices, and stories of science on the subcontinent as they connect with, and where they break away from, the world at large.

摘要

印度的科学史是对殖民问题的重新审视。科学是一种有待剖析和揭露的意识形态——根据你在解释谱系中的立场,它既可以是塑造现代性与进步的力量,也可以是制造暴力与压迫的力量。科学被视为一种受意识形态驱动的实践,是一种知识生产模式,其历史与它所依附的社会和政治用途密不可分。在殖民时期以及后殖民时期的背景下,科学技术被视为“帝国的意识形态”“帝国的工具”“进步的触角”和“国家的理由”。然而,科学技术是次大陆居民满怀热情参与其中的实践和知识体系,他们在全球、国家和个人生活中利用这些实践和知识体系塑造自我。我们对这些复杂互动的历史知之甚少。有必要摆脱当前史学关注的重点,去描绘和解释次大陆上科学的生命、机构、实践和故事,以及它们与整个世界的联系和背离之处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验