Raj Kapil
Centre Alexandre Koyré, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, 105, Boulevard Raspail, 75006 Paris, France.
Isis. 2013 Jun;104(2):337-47. doi: 10.1086/670951.
This essay traces the parallel, but unrelated, evolution of two sets of reactions to traditional idealist history of science in a world-historical context. While the scholars who fostered the postcolonial approach, in dealing with modern science in the non-West, espoused an idealist vision, they nevertheless stressed its political and ideological underpinnings and engaged with the question of its putative Western roots. The postidealist history of science developed its own vision with respect to the question of the global spread of modern science, paying little heed to postcolonial debates. It then proposes a historiographical approach developed in large part by historians of South Asian politics, economics, and science that, without compromising the preoccupations of each of the two groups, could help construct a mutually comprehensible and connected framework for the understanding of the global workings of the sciences.
本文追溯了在世界历史背景下,针对传统唯心主义科学史的两组反应的平行但不相关的演变。虽然倡导后殖民方法的学者在处理非西方的现代科学时秉持唯心主义观点,但他们仍强调其政治和意识形态基础,并探讨了其假定的西方根源问题。后唯心主义科学史针对现代科学的全球传播问题形成了自己的观点,对后殖民辩论几乎未加关注。然后,它提出了一种主要由南亚政治、经济和科学史学家发展而来的史学方法,这种方法在不损害两组人各自关注重点的情况下,有助于构建一个相互理解且相互关联的框架,以理解科学的全球运作。