O'Keeffe-Rosetti Maureen C, Hornbrook Mark C, Fishman Paul A, Ritzwoller Debra P, Keast Erin M, Staab Jenny, Lafata Jennifer Elston, Salloum Ramzi
Center for Health Research, Northwest/Hawai'i/Southeast, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 North Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227-1110, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013;2013(46):106-16. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgt002.
Medicare data represent 75% of aged and permanently disabled Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in the fee-for-service (FFS) indemnity option, but the data omit 25% of beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage health maintenance organizations (HMOs). Little research has examined how longitudinal patterns of utilization differ between HMOs and FFS. The Burden of Cancer Study developed and implemented an algorithm to assign standardized relative costs to HMO and Medicare FFS data consistently across time and place. Medicare uses 15 payment systems to reimburse FFS providers for covered services. The standardized relative resource cost algorithm (SRRCA) adapts these various payment systems to utilization data. We describe the rationale for modifications to the Medicare payment systems and discuss the implications of these modifications. We applied the SRRCA to data from four HMO sites and the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data. Some modifications to Medicare payment systems were required, because data elements needed to categorize utilization were missing from both data sources. For example, data were not available to create episodes for home health services received, so we assigned costs per visit based on visit type (nurse, therapist, and aide). For inpatient utilization, we modified Medicare's payment algorithm by changing it from a flat payment per diagnosis-related group to daily rates for diagnosis-related groups to differentiate shorter versus longer stays. The SRRCA can be used in multiple managed care plans and across multiple FFS delivery systems within the United States to create consistent relative cost data for economic analyses. Prior to international use of the SRRCA, data need to be standardized.
医疗保险数据涵盖了参加按服务收费(FFS)赔偿计划的75%的老年和永久性残疾医疗保险受益人,但这些数据遗漏了参加医疗保险优势健康维护组织(HMO)的25%的受益人。很少有研究探讨HMO和FFS之间的纵向使用模式有何不同。癌症负担研究开发并实施了一种算法,以便在不同时间和地点为HMO和医疗保险FFS数据一致地分配标准化相对成本。医疗保险使用15种支付系统向FFS提供者报销涵盖的服务费用。标准化相对资源成本算法(SRRCA)使这些不同的支付系统适用于使用数据。我们描述了对医疗保险支付系统进行修改的基本原理,并讨论了这些修改的影响。我们将SRRCA应用于来自四个HMO站点的数据以及相关的监测、流行病学和最终结果-医疗保险数据。由于两个数据源都缺少对使用情况进行分类所需的数据元素,因此需要对医疗保险支付系统进行一些修改。例如,没有可用数据来创建接受的家庭健康服务的事件,因此我们根据就诊类型(护士、治疗师和助手)分配每次就诊的费用。对于住院使用情况,我们修改了医疗保险的支付算法,将其从每个诊断相关组的固定支付改为诊断相关组的每日费率,以区分住院时间的长短。SRRCA可用于美国境内的多个管理式医疗计划以及多个FFS提供系统,以创建用于经济分析的一致相对成本数据。在国际上使用SRRCA之前,数据需要进行标准化。