Seoul Central Eye Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Sep 11;54(9):6150-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12093.
To investigate the relationship between unstable mean ocular perfusion pressure (MOPP) and the rate of paracentral visual field (PVF) progression in patients with medically treated normal-tension glaucoma (NTG).
The data of 157 eyes of 122 patients with NTG who were followed for more than 6 years (mean follow-up, 8.7 years ± 12.6 months) and had more than 5 reliable standard visual field (VF) tests were analyzed retrospectively. Groups in the highest, middle, and lowest tertiles of 24-hour MOPP fluctuation (HMF, MMF, and LMF, respectively) were compared in terms of rates of change of mean thresholds in the central 10° (PVF), 10° to 24°, and global areas by using a linear mixed model. Clinical factors associated with rapid PVF progression were also investigated.
The LMF and HMF groups did not differ significantly in the mean global rate of VF changes (-0.52 vs. -0.71 dB/y; P = 0.07). The HMF group had a significantly faster progression of VF defects in the central 10° area than the LMF group (-1.02 vs. -0.54 dB/y; P < 0.001) but did not differ in terms of progression of VF defects in the peripheral 10° to 24° area (-0.39 vs. -0.495 dB/y; P = 0.425). PVF progression was significantly associated with 24-hour MOPP fluctuation (β = -0.31, P < 0.001) and VF damage severity at initial presentation (β = 0.134, P = 0.011).
Medically treated NTG eyes with greater 24-hour MOPP fluctuations (HMF) had faster PVF defect progression than eyes with stable 24-hour MOPP (LMF). Twenty-four hour MOPP fluctuation associated significantly with PVF progression velocity.
研究在药物治疗的正常眼压性青光眼(NTG)患者中,不稳定的平均眼灌注压(MOPP)与旁中心视野(PVF)进展率之间的关系。
回顾性分析了 122 例 NTG 患者的 157 只眼,这些患者随访时间超过 6 年(平均随访 8.7 年±12.6 个月),且有超过 5 次可靠的标准视野(VF)检查。通过线性混合模型,比较 24 小时 MOPP 波动(HMF、MMF 和 LMF)最高、中、最低三分位数组之间中央 10°(PVF)、10°至 24°和全区域平均阈值变化率。还研究了与快速 PVF 进展相关的临床因素。
LMF 和 HMF 组的平均全球 VF 变化率无显著差异(-0.52 与-0.71 dB/y;P = 0.07)。HMF 组中央 10°区域的 VF 缺损进展速度明显快于 LMF 组(-1.02 与-0.54 dB/y;P < 0.001),但在周边 10°至 24°区域的 VF 缺损进展速度上无差异(-0.39 与-0.495 dB/y;P = 0.425)。PVF 进展与 24 小时 MOPP 波动显著相关(β =-0.31,P < 0.001),与初始 VF 损伤严重程度相关(β =0.134,P =0.011)。
与稳定的 24 小时 MOPP(LMF)相比,药物治疗的 NTG 眼 24 小时 MOPP 波动较大(HMF),其 PVF 缺损进展更快。24 小时 MOPP 波动与 PVF 进展速度显著相关。