Suppr超能文献

断尾和剪牙对猪的生理反应、伤口、行为、生长和背膘厚度的影响。

Effects of tail docking and teeth clipping on the physiological responses, wounds, behavior, growth, and backfat depth of pigs.

机构信息

College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2013 Oct;91(10):4908-16. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5996. Epub 2013 Aug 21.

Abstract

The objective of this experiment was to compare the effects of tail docking and teeth clipping on the growth and behavior of pigs. Pigs (n = 126) from 21 litters (6 pigs/litter) were blocked by birth weight, and assigned at 3 d of age within blocks to either teeth clipping and tail docking (processed) or control (sham-processed). Vocalizations of pigs were recorded during the procedures, and behavior was observed during the lactation, nursery, and growing periods. Blood samples were collected on d 21 to measure serum IgG concentrations. Wounds on the body and tail were assessed by inspecting both sides of the body and tail at 70, 110, and 160 d of age, whereas BW were recorded at 10, 21, 70, and 160 d of age. Fat and LM depths were measured ultrasonically on growing pigs at 160 d of age. Clipped and docked pigs vocalized more (1.06 vs. 0.62 s; P < 0.01) during processing, and processed pigs were observed lying alone more often (P = 0.03) during the 3 d after processing and the entire suckling period; however, teeth clipping and docking did not (P ≥ 0.14) alter the frequency that pigs spent suckling, standing, huddling, playing/fighting, or sitting during the first 3 d or between 5 and 15 d after processing. Social behavior during the nursery (P ≥ 0.23) and grower phases (P ≥ 0.18) was unaffected by clipping and docking, but processed pigs rested more (P = 0.03) during the nursery period and were less (P ≤ 0.01) interested in exploratory behaviors during both phases, especially during pen (P ≤ 0.04) and enrichment investigations (P ≤ 0.02). Teeth clipping and tail docking reduced ADG between 10 and 21 d (P = 0.01) and 21 to 70 d of age (P = 0.04), resulting in lighter BW at 21 (P = 0.01) and 70 d of age (P = 0.08) compared with sham-processed pigs. However, 160-d BW (P = 0.62), d 70 to 160 ADG (P = 0.23), and G:F (P ≥ 0.15) were not affected by teeth clipping and tail docking. Additionally, there was no difference between sham and processed pigs for fat depth (P ≥ 0.05), LM depth (P = 0.93), or estimated percent muscle (P = 0.27). Even though tail docking and teeth clipping appear to produce short-term pain and distress, results of this experiment indicate that leaving the teeth and tails intact have no detrimental effects on mortality, morbidity, live performance, or carcass merit of growing-finishing pigs.

摘要

本实验旨在比较断尾和剪牙对猪生长和行为的影响。将 21 窝(每窝 6 头)的猪按初生重分组,在 3 日龄时,根据窝别随机分为断尾剪牙(处理)和对照(假处理)组。在处理过程中记录猪的叫声,在哺乳期、保育期和生长期观察猪的行为。在第 21 天收集血液样本,以测量血清 IgG 浓度。在 70、110 和 160 日龄时,通过检查身体和尾巴两侧评估身体和尾巴上的伤口,在 10、21、70 和 160 日龄时记录体重。在 160 日龄时,通过超声测量生长猪的脂肪和肌肉深度。处理过程中,剪牙和断尾的猪叫声更多(1.06 比 0.62 秒;P < 0.01),处理后 3 天和整个哺乳期,处理猪更常独自躺着(P = 0.03);然而,剪牙和断尾并没有(P ≥ 0.14)改变猪在哺乳期、站立、拥挤、玩耍/打架或坐着的频率。保育期(P ≥ 0.23)和生长期(P ≥ 0.18)的社会行为不受剪牙和断尾的影响,但保育期处理猪休息更多(P = 0.03),对探索行为的兴趣较低,特别是在栏内(P ≤ 0.04)和丰容调查(P ≤ 0.02)中。断尾和剪牙降低了 10 至 21 日龄(P = 0.01)和 21 至 70 日龄(P = 0.04)的 ADG,导致 21 日龄(P = 0.01)和 70 日龄(P = 0.08)体重较轻与假处理猪相比。然而,160 日龄体重(P = 0.62)、70 至 160 日龄 ADG(P = 0.23)和增重/饲料比(P ≥ 0.15)不受断尾和剪牙的影响。此外,假处理和处理猪的脂肪深度(P ≥ 0.05)、肌肉深度(P = 0.93)或估计的肌肉百分比(P = 0.27)没有差异。尽管断尾和剪牙似乎会产生短期的疼痛和不适,但本实验结果表明,保留牙齿和尾巴不会对生长育肥猪的死亡率、发病率、生产性能或胴体质量产生不利影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验