Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;70(10):1084-90. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.377.
Medicaid is the largest payer of mental health (MH) care in the United States, and this role will increase among states that opt into the Medicaid expansion. However, owing to the dearth of MH care providers who accept Medicaid, expanded coverage may not increase access to services. Facilities that provide specialty outpatient MH services and accept Medicaid compose the backbone of the community-based treatment infrastructure for Medicaid enrollees. For states that opt into the expansion, it is important to understand which local communities may face the greatest barriers to access these facilities.
To examine the availability of outpatient MH facilities that accept Medicaid across US counties and whether specific types of communities are more likely to lack this infrastructure.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data from the 2008 National Survey of Mental Health Treatment Facilities and Area Resource File were merged. A generalized ordered logistic regression with state fixed effects was estimated to examine determinants of accessibility of these facilities. Covariates included the percentages of residents who are black, Hispanic, living in poverty, and living in a rural area.
An ordered variable assessed whether a county had no access to outpatient MH facilities that accept Medicaid, intermediate access to these facilities (ie, ≥1 facility, but not top quintile of facility to Medicaid enrollee per capita ratio), or high access (ie, top quintile of facility to Medicaid enrollee per capita ratio).
More than one-third of counties do not have any outpatient MH facilities that accept Medicaid. Communities with a larger percentage of residents who are black (marginal effect [ME] = 3.9%; 95% CI, 1.2%-6.6%), Hispanic (ME = 4.8%; 95% CI, 2.3%-7.4%), or living in a rural area (ME = 27.9%; 95% CI, 25.3%-30.4%) are more likely to lack these facilities.
Many communities may face constraints on the MH safety-net system as Medicaid is expanded, especially rural communities and communities with a large percentage of black or Hispanic residents.
医疗补助是美国最大的精神健康(MH)护理支付方,而在选择扩大医疗补助覆盖范围的各州中,这一角色将进一步增强。然而,由于接受医疗补助的 MH 护理提供者稀缺,扩大覆盖范围可能不会增加服务的可及性。提供专业门诊 MH 服务并接受医疗补助的机构构成了接受医疗补助者的基于社区的治疗基础设施的核心。对于选择扩大覆盖范围的州来说,了解哪些地方社区可能面临最大的障碍,以获得这些设施是很重要的。
研究美国各县接受医疗补助的门诊 MH 设施的可用性,以及哪些特定类型的社区更有可能缺乏这种基础设施。
设计、设置和参与者:合并了 2008 年全国精神健康治疗设施调查和地区资源档案的数据。采用具有州固定效应的广义有序逻辑回归来评估这些设施的可及性的决定因素。协变量包括居民中黑人、西班牙裔、生活贫困和居住在农村地区的比例。
一个有序变量评估了一个县是否没有接受医疗补助的门诊 MH 设施,是否有中等程度的这些设施(即,有≥1 个设施,但按人均接受医疗补助者的比例,未进入设施的前五分位),或有高度的这些设施(即,处于设施的前五分位)。
超过三分之一的县没有任何接受医疗补助的门诊 MH 设施。黑人(边际效应[ME] = 3.9%;95%置信区间[CI],1.2%-6.6%)、西班牙裔(ME = 4.8%;95% CI,2.3%-7.4%)或居住在农村地区(ME = 27.9%;95% CI,25.3%-30.4%)的居民比例较大的社区更有可能缺乏这些设施。
随着医疗补助的扩大,许多社区可能会面临 MH 安全网系统的限制,特别是农村社区和黑人或西班牙裔居民比例较大的社区。