Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Normand, Zelevinsky, Abing); Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston (Normand); Office of Mental Health, New York State Department of Health, Albany (Finnerty, Leckman-Westin, Chen, Jeong); Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University at Albany School of Public Health, Rensselaer, New York (Leckman-Westin); RAND, Santa Monica, California (Tsuei), and Boston (Horvitz-Lennon); Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge Health Alliance and Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Horvitz-Lennon).
Psychiatr Serv. 2024 Oct 1;75(10):969-978. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230564. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
The authors sought to update and expand the evidence on the quality of health care and disparities in care among Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia.
Adult beneficiaries of New York State Medicaid with schizophrenia receiving care during 2016-2019 were identified. Composite quality scores were derived from item response theory models by using evidence-based indicators of the quality of mental and general medical health care. Risk-adjusted racial-ethnic differences in quality were estimated and summarized as percentiles relative to White beneficiaries' mean quality scores.
The study included 71,013 beneficiaries; 42.8% were Black, 22.9% Latinx, 27.4% White, and 6.9% other race-ethnicity. Overall, 68.8% had a mental health follow-up within 30 days of discharge, and 90.2% had no preventable hospitalizations for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma. Among beneficiaries receiving antipsychotic medications, medication adherence was adequate for 43.7%. Fourteen indicators for mental and general medical health care quality yielded three composites: two for mental health care (pharmacological and ambulatory) and one for acute mental and general medical health care. Mean quality of pharmacological mental health care for Black and Latinx beneficiaries was lower than for White beneficiaries (39th and 44th percentile, respectively). For Black beneficiaries, mean quality of ambulatory mental health care was also lower (46th percentile). In New York City, Black beneficiaries received lower-quality care in all domains. The only meaningful group difference in the quality of acute mental and general medical health care indicated higher-quality care for individuals with other race-ethnicity.
Disparities in the quality of Medicaid-financed health care persist, particularly for Black beneficiaries. Regional differences merit further attention.
作者旨在更新和扩展有关医疗补助计划(Medicaid)受益的精神分裂症患者的医疗保健质量和护理差距的证据。
确定了在 2016 年至 2019 年期间接受护理的纽约州医疗补助计划的成年精神分裂症受益人的数据。通过使用精神和一般医疗保健质量的循证指标,从项目反应理论模型中得出综合质量评分。估计了调整风险后的种族差异,并以相对于白人受益人的平均质量评分的百分位数形式进行了总结。
研究包括 71,013 名受益人的数据;42.8%为黑人,22.9%为拉丁裔,27.4%为白人,6.9%为其他种族。总体而言,68.8%的患者在出院后 30 天内进行了心理健康随访,90.2%的患者没有因慢性阻塞性肺疾病或哮喘而导致的可预防住院。在接受抗精神病药物治疗的受益人群中,药物依从性充足的比例为 43.7%。精神和一般医疗保健质量的 14 个指标产生了三个综合指标:两个用于心理健康护理(药物治疗和门诊)和一个用于急性心理健康和一般医疗保健。黑人受益人和拉丁裔受益人的药物治疗心理健康护理的平均质量低于白人受益人的平均质量(分别为第 39 百分位和第 44 百分位)。对于黑人受益人群,门诊心理健康护理的平均质量也较低(第 46 百分位)。在纽约市,黑人受益人群在所有领域的护理质量都较低。在急性心理健康和一般医疗保健质量方面,唯一有意义的群体差异表明,其他种族受益人的护理质量更高。
医疗补助计划资助的医疗保健质量存在差异,尤其是对于黑人受益人群。区域差异值得进一步关注。