Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology.
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Nov;51(11):3555-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01868-13. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
Detection of Histoplasma capsulatum urinary antigen (UAg) is important for the initial diagnosis of infection and for monitoring of patient responses to antifungal therapy. This study evaluated an analyte-specific reagent (ASR) enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the detection of H. capsulatum UAg from Immuno Mycologics, Inc. (IMMY) (Norman, OK) in comparison with routine testing with the MiraVista (MVista) H. capsulatum quantitative EIA (MiraVista Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). Using prospectively collected urine specimens (n = 1,003), we observed an overall percent agreement between the two assays of 97.6% (979/1,003 samples). Compared with the MVista EIA, the sensitivity and specificity of the IMMY ASR EIA were 64.5% (40/62 samples) and 99.8% (939/941 samples), respectively, using a cutoff value of 0.5 ng/ml. Based on available clinical histories for 23/24 discordant samples, 5 IMMY assay-negative/MVista assay-positive samples were considered falsely positive. Furthermore, 10/23 discordant samples were positive by the MVista EIA but were below the limit of quantitation (<0.4 ng/ml). The clinical significance of these low positive results in the MVista EIA is unclear. In addition to the prospective study, we tested 11 urine specimens collected from patients with culture-confirmed Histoplasma infections, and 100% (11/11 samples) were positive by the IMMY ASR EIA. In conclusion, the IMMY ASR EIA may offer an alternative approach for the detection of Histoplasma UAg. Additional prospective studies are needed to better characterize the performance of the IMMY ASR EIA in conjunction with clinical and laboratory findings.
检测荚膜组织胞浆菌尿抗原 (UAg) 对于感染的初始诊断和监测患者对抗真菌治疗的反应非常重要。本研究评估了一种来自 Immuno Mycologics, Inc. (IMMY)(俄克拉荷马州诺曼)的分析物特异性试剂 (ASR) 酶免疫分析 (EIA),用于检测荚膜组织胞浆菌 UAg,与常规使用 MiraVista (MVista) 荚膜组织胞浆菌定量 EIA(印第安纳波利斯的 MiraVista Diagnostics)进行比较。使用前瞻性收集的尿液标本(n = 1,003),我们观察到两种检测方法之间的总一致性为 97.6%(979/1,003 个样本)。与 MVista EIA 相比,IMMY ASR EIA 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 64.5%(40/62 个样本)和 99.8%(939/941 个样本),截断值为 0.5 ng/ml。根据 24 个不一致样本中的 23 个样本的可用临床病史,5 个 IMMY 检测阴性/MVista 检测阳性样本被认为是假阳性。此外,10/23 个不一致样本的 MVista EIA 检测结果为阳性,但低于定量下限 (<0.4 ng/ml)。MVista EIA 中这些低阳性结果的临床意义尚不清楚。除了前瞻性研究外,我们还测试了来自 11 名经培养证实患有荚膜组织胞浆菌感染的患者的 11 份尿液标本,100%(11/11 份样本)通过 IMMY ASR EIA 检测为阳性。总之,IMMY ASR EIA 可能为检测荚膜组织胞浆菌 UAg 提供一种替代方法。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来更好地描述 IMMY ASR EIA 与临床和实验室发现相结合的性能。