Bourke J H, Johnson A L, Sharpe M, Chalder T, White P D
Centre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute for Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge Institute of Public Health.
Psychol Med. 2014 May;44(7):1545-52. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713002201. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
Pain is a common symptom of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). We investigated the effects of the treatments used in the PACE trial [cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), graded exercise therapy (GET), adaptive pacing therapy (APT) and specialist medical care (SMC)] on pain in CFS.
We compared pain outcomes including individual painful symptoms, taken from the CDC criteria for CFS and co-morbid fibromyalgia. We modelled outcomes adjusting for baseline variables with multiple linear regression.
Significantly less frequent muscle pain was reported by patients following treatment with CBT compared to SMC (mean difference = 0.38 unit change in frequency, p = 0.02), GET versus SMC (0.42, p = 0.01) and GET versus APT (0.37, p = 0.01). Significantly less joint pain was reported following CBT versus APT (0.35, p = 0.02) and GET versus APT (0.36, p = 0.02). Co-morbid fibromyalgia was less frequent following GET versus SMC (0.03, p = 0.03). The effect sizes of these differences varied between 0.25 and 0.31 for muscle pain and 0.24 and 0.26 for joint pain. Treatment effects on pain were independent of 'change in fatigue'.
CBT and GET were more effective in reducing the frequency of both muscle and joint pain than APT and SMC. When compared to SMC, GET also reduced the frequency of co-morbid fibromyalgia; the size of this effect on pain was small.
疼痛是慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)的常见症状。我们研究了PACE试验中使用的治疗方法[认知行为疗法(CBT)、分级运动疗法(GET)、适应性 pacing 疗法(APT)和专科医疗护理(SMC)]对CFS疼痛的影响。
我们比较了疼痛结果,包括从CFS和共病纤维肌痛的CDC标准中提取的个体疼痛症状。我们使用多元线性回归对基线变量进行调整后对结果进行建模。
与SMC相比,接受CBT治疗的患者报告的肌肉疼痛频率显著降低(平均差异=频率变化0.38单位,p=0.02),GET与SMC相比(0.42,p=0.01),GET与APT相比(0.37,p=0.01)。与APT相比,CBT后报告的关节疼痛显著减少(0.35,p=0.02),GET与APT相比(0.36,p=0.02)。与SMC相比,GET后共病纤维肌痛的发生率较低(0.03,p=0.03)。这些差异的效应大小在肌肉疼痛方面为0.25至0.31,在关节疼痛方面为0.24至0.26。治疗对疼痛的影响与“疲劳变化”无关。
CBT和GET在降低肌肉和关节疼痛频率方面比APT和SMC更有效。与SMC相比,GET还降低了共病纤维肌痛的频率;这种对疼痛的影响大小较小。