Wormgoor Marjon E A, Rodenburg Sanne C
Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.
Division Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Stavern, Norway.
J Transl Med. 2021 Jan 4;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02683-4.
Due to the inconsistent use of diagnostic criteria in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), it is unsure whether physiotherapeutic management regarded effective in ME/CFS is appropriate for patients diagnosed with criteria that consider post-exertional malaise (PEM) as a hallmark feature.
To appraise current evidence of the effects of physiotherapy on symptoms and functioning in ME/CFS patients in view of the significance of PEM in the applied diagnostic criteria for inclusion.
A systematic review of randomized controlled trials published over the last two decades was conducted. Studies evaluating physiotherapeutic interventions for adult ME/CFS patients were included. The diagnostic criteria sets were classified into three groups according to the extent to which the importance of PEM was emphasized: chronic fatigue (CF; PEM not mentioned as a criterion), CFS (PEM included as an optional or minor criterion) or ME (PEM is a required symptom). The main results of included studies were synthesized in relation to the classification of the applied diagnostic criteria. In addition, special attention was given to the tolerability of the interventions.
Eighteen RCTs were included in the systematic review: three RCTs with CF patients, 14 RCTs with CFS patients and one RCT covering ME patients with PEM. Intervention effects, if any, seemed to disappear with more narrow case definitions, increasing objectivity of the outcome measures and longer follow-up.
Currently, there is no scientific evidence when it comes to effective physiotherapy for ME patients. Applying treatment that seems effective for CF or CFS patients may have adverse consequences for ME patients and should be avoided.
由于肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征(ME/CFS)诊断标准使用不一致,尚不确定在ME/CFS中被认为有效的物理治疗管理方法是否适用于依据将运动后不适(PEM)作为标志性特征的标准诊断出的患者。
鉴于PEM在纳入的应用诊断标准中的重要性,评估物理治疗对ME/CFS患者症状和功能影响的现有证据。
对过去二十年发表的随机对照试验进行系统评价。纳入评估针对成年ME/CFS患者物理治疗干预措施的研究。根据对PEM重要性的强调程度,将诊断标准集分为三组:慢性疲劳(CF;未将PEM作为标准提及)、CFS(将PEM作为可选或次要标准纳入)或ME(PEM是必需症状)。纳入研究的主要结果根据应用诊断标准的分类进行综合。此外,特别关注干预措施的耐受性。
系统评价纳入了18项随机对照试验:3项针对CF患者的随机对照试验、14项针对CFS患者的随机对照试验以及1项涵盖患有PEM的ME患者的随机对照试验。如果存在干预效果,随着病例定义更狭窄、结局测量的客观性增加以及随访时间延长,效果似乎会消失。
目前,对于ME患者有效的物理治疗尚无科学证据。对CF或CFS患者似乎有效的治疗方法可能对ME患者产生不良后果,应避免使用。