Suppr超能文献

医学生和整骨学生对同伴体格检查(PPE)接受度的评估:一项横断面调查。

Evaluation of the acceptability of Peer Physical Examination (PPE) in medical and osteopathic students: a cross sectional survey.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Surgical Sciences, University "Sapienza" of Rome, Viale del Policlinico, 00161, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2013 Aug 22;13:111. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-111.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peer physical examination (PPE) is a method of training in medical and osteopathic curricula. The aim of this study was to compare the acceptability of PPE in two classes of medical and osteopathic students after their first experience, to obtain comparative information useful for an understanding of the different professional approaches. The leading hypothesis was that osteopathic students enter the curriculum with a more positive attitude to bodily contact.As a secondary aim, this study validated the new version of a questionnaire to assess the acceptability of PPE.

METHODS

A new version of a previously validated questionnaire and an instrument from the literature (the Examining Fellow Student [EFS] questionnaire) were used for a cross-sectional survey in a class of 129 3rd year medical students and in two parallel classes of 1st year osteopathic students (total of 112 students).

RESULTS

The mean score of the new questionnaire was significantly higher for the osteopathic students than for the medical students (53.4 ± 6.3 vs. 43.4 ± 8.9; p < 0.01). The only independent variables that were significantly predictive of the score in a linear regression analysis were gender and the condition of medical or osteopathic student. The EFS mean score also showed a significant difference between the osteopathic and medical students (30.76 ± 2.9 vs. 27.85 ± 4.3; p < 0.01).Factor analysis of the new questionnaire identified three factors (appropriateness and usefulness, sexual implications and passive role) accounting for 62.8% of the variance. Criterion validity was assessed by correlation with the EFS (Pearson's r coefficient = 0.61). Reliability was expressed in terms of Cronbach's alpha coefficient, which equals 0.86.

CONCLUSIONS

These quantitative results are consistent with previous qualitative research on the process of embodiment both in medicine and osteopathy. The new questionnaire proved to be valid and reliable. The objective assessment of the acceptability of PPE is a way to determine differences in students' attitudes towards contact with the body and can be used for counselling students regarding career choice. This study can also highlight differences between students from different professions and serve as a basis for reflection for improved mutual interprofessional understanding and future interprofessional education.

摘要

背景

同学互检(PPE)是医学和整骨课程培训的一种方法。本研究的目的是比较医学生和整骨学生在首次体验后对 PPE 的接受程度,以获得有助于理解不同专业方法的比较信息。主要假设是整骨学生进入课程时对身体接触持更积极的态度。作为次要目标,本研究验证了一种评估 PPE 可接受性的新问卷版本。

方法

在一个 129 名三年级医学生的班级和两个平行的一年级整骨学生班级(共 112 名学生)中,使用之前验证过的问卷的新版本和文献中的工具(Examining Fellow Student [EFS] 问卷)进行横断面调查。

结果

整骨学生的新问卷平均得分明显高于医学生(53.4 ± 6.3 对 43.4 ± 8.9;p < 0.01)。线性回归分析中唯一显著预测得分的自变量是性别和医学生或整骨学生的状况。EFS 的平均得分也显示出整骨学生和医学生之间的显著差异(30.76 ± 2.9 对 27.85 ± 4.3;p < 0.01)。新问卷的因子分析确定了三个因素(适当性和有用性、性暗示和被动角色),占方差的 62.8%。通过与 EFS 的相关性评估了效标效度(Pearson r 系数= 0.61)。可靠性用 Cronbach's alpha 系数表示,等于 0.86。

结论

这些定量结果与医学和整骨领域关于身体体现过程的先前定性研究一致。新问卷被证明是有效和可靠的。对 PPE 可接受性的客观评估是确定学生对身体接触态度差异的一种方法,可以用于指导学生选择职业。本研究还可以突出不同专业学生之间的差异,为改善相互理解和未来的跨专业教育提供基础。

相似文献

3
A Mokken scale analysis of the peer physical examination questionnaire.同伴体格检查问卷的莫肯量表分析
Chiropr Man Therap. 2018 Mar 1;26:6. doi: 10.1186/s12998-018-0176-0. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

7
Osteopathy students profile in Italy: A cross sectional census.意大利整骨疗法学生概况:横断面普查。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 24;16(2):e0247405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247405. eCollection 2021.
8
A Mokken scale analysis of the peer physical examination questionnaire.同伴体格检查问卷的莫肯量表分析
Chiropr Man Therap. 2018 Mar 1;26:6. doi: 10.1186/s12998-018-0176-0. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验