Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2013 Sep;13 Suppl 2(0 2):S289-94. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2013.05.025. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
Decitabine is standard therapy in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Current recommendations suggest a dose of 20 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) daily for 5 days every 4 weeks. However, this therapy is associated with frequent grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity, requiring dose delays and/or dose reductions (DD/DR).
We investigated the outcomes of 122 patients with MDS who had DD/DR of frontline decitabine therapy. Sixty-five patients (53%) had DR by at least 25% or DD (defined as a delay beyond 5 weeks between cycles). Thirty-five patients (29%) underwent DD/DR after achieving best objective response, 30 patients (25%) underwent DD/DR before best objective response, and 57 (54%) patients had no DD/DR. There was a trend for more durable responses in favor of patients requiring DD/DR after the achievement of best objective response (median not reached) (P = .161). Overall survival rates were significantly higher for patients who had DD/DR after best objective response compared with those who had DD/DR before best objective response or those with no DD/DR (30 vs. 22 vs. 11 months, respectively; P < .001). Progression-free survival (PFS) rates also trended higher for those with DD/DR after best objective response (median not reached) compared with those who required DD/DR before best objective response (median of 15 months) (P = .285).
DD/DR may be safely accomplished once the patient has achieved best objective response (preferably complete remission [CR]) without impacting outcome. Prospective evaluation of an approach conceived of a loading dose for induction of a best objective response followed by a maintenance schedule is to be considered.
地西他滨是骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者的标准治疗方法。目前的建议是每 4 周静脉注射(IV)每日 20mg/m²,连用 5 天。然而,这种治疗与频繁的 3/4 级血液学毒性相关,需要延迟剂量和/或减少剂量(DD/DR)。
我们调查了 122 例 MDS 患者的治疗结果,这些患者接受了一线地西他滨治疗的 DD/DR。65 例患者(53%)的 DR 至少减少了 25%或 DD(定义为两个周期之间的延迟超过 5 周)。35 例患者(29%)在达到最佳客观缓解后进行 DD/DR,30 例患者(25%)在最佳客观缓解前进行 DD/DR,57 例患者(54%)未进行 DD/DR。在达到最佳客观缓解后需要 DD/DR 的患者中,具有更持久缓解的趋势(中位数未达到)(P =.161)。与在最佳客观缓解前需要 DD/DR 的患者或未进行 DD/DR 的患者相比,在达到最佳客观缓解后需要 DD/DR 的患者的总生存率显著提高(分别为 30 个月、22 个月和 11 个月,P <.001)。在达到最佳客观缓解后需要 DD/DR 的患者的无进展生存期(PFS)也较高(中位数未达到)(与在最佳客观缓解前需要 DD/DR 的患者相比,P =.285)。
一旦患者达到最佳客观缓解(最好是完全缓解[CR]),而不影响结果,可以安全地进行 DD/DR。应考虑采用诱导最佳客观缓解的负荷剂量,然后采用维持方案的方法进行前瞻性评估。