Desrosiers Taylor, Cupido Clint, Pitout Elizabeth, van Niekerk Lindi, Badri Motasim, Gwyther Liz, Harding Richard
Victoria Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa; Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Victoria Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa; University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Apr;47(4):786-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.05.021. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
Despite emerging data of cost savings under palliative care in various regions, no such data have been generated in response to the high burden of terminal illness in Africa.
This evaluation of a novel hospital-based palliative care service for patients with advanced organ failure in urban South Africa aimed to determine whether the service reduces admissions and increases home death rates compared with the same fixed time period of standard hospital care.
Data on admissions and place of death were extracted from routine hospital activity records for a fixed period before death, using standard patient daily expense rates. Data from the first 56 consecutive deaths under the new service (intervention group) were compared with 48 consecutive deaths among patients immediately before the new service (historical controls).
Among the intervention and control patients, 40 of 56 (71.4%) and 47 of 48 (97.9%), respectively, had at least one admission (P < 0.001). The mean number of admissions for the intervention and control groups was 1.39 and 1.98, respectively (P < 0.001). The mean total number of days spent admitted for intervention and control groups was 4.52 and 9.3 days, respectively (P < 0.001). For the intervention and control patients, a total of 253 and 447 admission days were recorded, respectively, with formal costs of $587 and $1209, respectively. For the intervention and control groups, home death was achieved by 33 of 56 (58.9%) and nine of 48 (18.8%), respectively (P ≤ 0.001).
These data demonstrate that an outpatient hospital-based service reduced admissions and improved the rate of home deaths and offers a feasible and cost-effective model for such settings.
尽管在各个地区都有关于姑息治疗节省成本的新数据,但针对非洲晚期疾病的沉重负担,尚未产生此类数据。
对南非城市地区为晚期器官衰竭患者提供的新型医院姑息治疗服务进行评估,旨在确定与相同固定时间段的标准医院护理相比,该服务是否能减少住院次数并提高在家中死亡的比例。
使用标准患者每日费用率,从死亡前固定时间段的常规医院活动记录中提取住院和死亡地点的数据。将新服务下连续56例死亡患者(干预组)的数据与新服务开展前连续48例死亡患者(历史对照组)的数据进行比较。
在干预组和对照组患者中,分别有56例中的40例(71.4%)和48例中的47例(97.9%)至少有一次住院(P<0.001)。干预组和对照组的平均住院次数分别为1.39次和1.98次(P<0.001)。干预组和对照组的平均住院总天数分别为4.52天和9.3天(P<0.001)。干预组和对照组患者的住院天数分别记录为253天和447天,正式费用分别为587美元和1209美元。干预组和对照组在家中死亡的比例分别为56例中的33例(58.9%)和48例中的9例(18.8%)(P≤0.001)。
这些数据表明,基于医院门诊的服务减少了住院次数,提高了在家中死亡的比例,并为此类环境提供了一种可行且具有成本效益的模式。