Università di Trento, Italy.
Public Underst Sci. 2013 Nov;22(8):904-15. doi: 10.1177/0963662513498202. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
There is little doubt that during the past few decades science communication efforts aimed at non-expert audiences have increased in quantity and intensity on a global scale. Public engagement and outreach activities have now become a routine - when not a prominent - feature for several research institutions in Europe. However, it would be difficult for both scholars and those involved in science communication to agree on the impact of these activities, on the long-term implications of the 'science communication movement' and on the indicators we should develop and employ in order to assess impact. The paper argues that quality is a relevant issue and challenge for contemporary science communication. Style is relevant to addressing that challenge, insofar as it relates to discussions about how to strengthen the quality of science communication, suggesting a different perspective other than the traditional normative/prescriptive framework. The notion of style also fruitfully connects the debate on science communication with a rich tradition of studies in the history and sociology of science.
毫无疑问,在过去几十年里,旨在面向非专业受众的科学传播工作在全球范围内无论是数量还是强度都有所增加。公众参与和外联活动现在已经成为一些欧洲研究机构的常规——即使不是突出的——特征。然而,学者和从事科学传播的人都很难就这些活动的影响、“科学传播运动”的长期影响以及我们应该制定和使用哪些指标来评估影响达成一致意见。本文认为,质量是当代科学传播的一个相关问题和挑战。风格与应对这一挑战有关,因为它涉及到如何加强科学传播质量的讨论,提出了一个不同于传统规范/规定框架的不同视角。风格的概念也成功地将科学传播的辩论与科学史和科学社会学的丰富研究传统联系起来。