Allanson Paul, Petrie Dennis
University of Dundee.
Health Econ. 2014 Nov;23(11):1390-6. doi: 10.1002/hec.2984. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
The choice of income-related health inequality measures in comparative studies is often determined by custom and analytical concerns, without much explicit consideration of the vertical equity judgements underlying alternative measures. This note employs an inequality map to illustrate how these judgements determine the ranking of populations by health inequality. In particular, it is shown that relative indices of inequality in health attainments and shortfalls embody distinct vertical equity judgments, where each may represent ethically defensible positions in specific contexts. Further research is needed to explore people's preferences over distributions of income and health.
在比较研究中,与收入相关的健康不平等衡量指标的选择往往由惯例和分析考量决定,而没有太多明确考虑替代指标背后的垂直公平判断。本注释采用不平等地图来说明这些判断如何通过健康不平等来确定人群的排名。具体而言,研究表明,健康成就和不足方面的不平等相对指数体现了不同的垂直公平判断,其中每一种在特定背景下都可能代表符合伦理的合理立场。需要进一步研究来探索人们对收入和健康分配的偏好。