Department of Biochemistry, University of Illinois , Urbana, IL , USA.
Front Immunol. 2013 Aug 21;4:244. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00244. eCollection 2013.
Over the last several years, there has been considerable progress in the treatment of cancer using gene modified adoptive T cell therapies. Two approaches have been used, one involving the introduction of a conventional αβ T cell receptor (TCR) against a pepMHC cancer antigen, and the second involving introduction of a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) consisting of a single-chain antibody as an Fv fragment linked to transmembrane and signaling domains. In this review, we focus on one aspect of TCR-mediated adoptive T cell therapies, the impact of the affinity of the αβ TCR for the pepMHC cancer antigen on both efficacy and specificity. We discuss the advantages of higher-affinity TCRs in mediating potent activity of CD4 T cells. This is balanced with the potential disadvantage of higher-affinity TCRs in mediating greater self-reactivity against a wider range of structurally similar antigenic peptides, especially in synergy with the CD8 co-receptor. Both TCR affinity and target selection will influence potential safety issues. We suggest pre-clinical strategies that might be used to examine each TCR for possible on-target and off-target side effects due to self-reactivities, and to adjust TCR affinities accordingly.
在过去的几年中,使用基因修饰的过继性 T 细胞疗法治疗癌症取得了相当大的进展。有两种方法被采用,一种是引入针对 pepMHC 癌症抗原的常规 αβ T 细胞受体(TCR),另一种是引入由单链抗体作为 Fv 片段与跨膜和信号结构域连接的嵌合抗原受体(CAR)。在这篇综述中,我们关注 TCR 介导的过继性 T 细胞疗法的一个方面,即 αβ TCR 对 pepMHC 癌症抗原的亲和力对疗效和特异性的影响。我们讨论了高亲和力 TCR 在介导 CD4 T 细胞的有效活性方面的优势。这与高亲和力 TCR 在介导针对更广泛结构相似抗原肽的更高自身反应性的潜在劣势相平衡,尤其是与 CD8 共受体协同作用时。TCR 亲和力和靶标选择都会影响潜在的安全问题。我们建议使用临床前策略来检查每个 TCR 是否存在由于自身反应性而导致的靶标和脱靶副作用的可能性,并相应地调整 TCR 亲和力。