• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Check in the Mail or More in the Paycheck: Does the Effectiveness of Fiscal Stimulus Depend on How It Is Delivered?邮件查收还是薪水增加:财政刺激的有效性取决于其发放方式吗?
Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2012 Aug;4(3):216-50. doi: 10.1257/pol.4.3.216.
2
Household spending and fiscal support during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from a new consumer survey.新冠疫情期间的家庭支出与财政支持:一项新的消费者调查的见解
J Monet Econ. 2022 Jul;129:S1-S14. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2022.02.007. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
3
Spend as you were told: Evidence from labeled COVID-19 stimulus payments in South Korea.照吩咐花钱:来自韩国新冠疫情刺激资金标记的证据。
J Public Econ. 2023 May;221:104867. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.104867. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
4
Informal payments and intra-household allocation of resources for health care in Albania.阿尔巴尼亚的非正式支付和医疗资源的家庭内分配。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jan 23;12:17. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-17.
5
Mortgage payments and household consumption in urban China.中国城市的抵押贷款支付与家庭消费。
Econ Model. 2020 Dec;93:100-111. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2020.07.008. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
6
Monopoly money: the effect of payment coupling and form on spending behavior.垄断货币:支付耦合与形式对消费行为的影响
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Sep;14(3):213-25. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.14.3.213.
7
The effect of income-based policies on mortality inequalities in Scotland: a modelling study.基于收入的政策对苏格兰死亡率不平等的影响:一项建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Mar;5(3):e150-e156. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30011-6.
8
The Health Effects Of Expanding The Earned Income Tax Credit: Results From New York City.扩大劳动所得税收抵免的健康效应:来自纽约市的结果。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jul;39(7):1149-1156. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01556.
9
Growth in private payments for health care by Canadian households.加拿大家庭用于医疗保健的私人支出增长。
Health Policy. 2013 May;110(2-3):141-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.01.014. Epub 2013 Feb 16.
10
Financial protection from health spending in the Philippines: policies and progress.菲律宾卫生支出的财务保护:政策与进展
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Sep;31(7):919-27. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw011. Epub 2016 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF COVID-19: EVIDENCE FROM A NEW PUBLIC DATABASE BUILT USING PRIVATE SECTOR DATA.新冠疫情的经济影响:来自利用私营部门数据构建的新公共数据库的证据。
Q J Econ. 2024 May;139(2):829-889. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjad048. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
2
Means-tested COVID-19 stimulus payment and consumer spending: Evidence from card transaction data in South Korea.基于经济状况调查的新冠疫情刺激付款与消费者支出:来自韩国信用卡交易数据的证据
Econ Anal Policy. 2023 Jun;78:1359-1371. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2023.05.017. Epub 2023 May 25.
3
Impacts of COVID-19 lockdowns and stimulus payments on low-income population's spending in the United States.新冠疫情封锁措施和经济刺激政策对美国低收入人群消费的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 8;16(9):e0256407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256407. eCollection 2021.
4
Reciprocity and the ethics of giving during pandemics.互惠与疫情期间的给予伦理
J Soc Philos. 2021 Winter;52(4):516-535. doi: 10.1111/josp.12408. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
5
COGNITIVE ECONOMICS.认知经济学
Jpn Econ Rev (Oxf). 2015 Jun;66(2):167-181. doi: 10.1111/jere.12070. Epub 2015 May 7.
6
FUNGIBILITY AND CONSUMER CHOICE: EVIDENCE FROM COMMODITY PRICE SHOCKS.可替代性与消费者选择:来自商品价格冲击的证据
Q J Econ. 2013 Nov;128(4):1449-1498. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjt018. Epub 2013 Jun 22.
7
Did the 2008 Tax Rebates Stimulate Spending?2008年的退税政策刺激消费了吗?
Am Econ Rev. 2009 May;99(2):374-379. doi: 10.1257/aer.99.2.374.

本文引用的文献

1
Did the 2008 Tax Rebates Stimulate Spending?2008年的退税政策刺激消费了吗?
Am Econ Rev. 2009 May;99(2):374-379. doi: 10.1257/aer.99.2.374.

邮件查收还是薪水增加:财政刺激的有效性取决于其发放方式吗?

Check in the Mail or More in the Paycheck: Does the Effectiveness of Fiscal Stimulus Depend on How It Is Delivered?

作者信息

Sahm Claudia R, Shapiro Matthew D, Slemrod Joel

机构信息

Sahm: Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC 20551 (

出版信息

Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2012 Aug;4(3):216-50. doi: 10.1257/pol.4.3.216.

DOI:10.1257/pol.4.3.216
PMID:23970951
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3747574/
Abstract

Recent fiscal policies, including the 2008 stimulus payments and the 2009 Making Work Pay Tax Credit, aimed to increase household spending. This paper quantifies the spending response to these policies and examines differences in spending by whether the stimulus was delivered as a one-time payment or as a flow of payments from reduced withholding. Based on responses from a representative sample of households in the Thomson Reuters University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers, the paper finds that the reduction in withholding in 2009 boosted spending at roughly half the rate (13 percent) as the one-time payments (25 percent) in 2008.

摘要

近期的财政政策,包括2008年的刺激性支付和2009年的“工作付酬税收抵免”,旨在增加家庭支出。本文对这些政策的支出反应进行了量化,并考察了刺激措施是以一次性支付还是以减少预扣税款的支付流形式发放时的支出差异。基于汤森路透/密歇根大学消费者调查中具有代表性的家庭样本的反馈,本文发现,2009年预扣税款的减少对支出的提振速度约为2008年一次性支付(25%)的一半(13%)。